5 Killer Charts From The June Internationals

Matt Rowley July 4, 2012 33

No GravatarWith 10 Tests in the bag between the home nations and the Southern Hemisphere superpowers through June 2012, what have we learned? Some would say that the tightness of many of the results belied the near-on whitewash scoreline of the three series.

Here are a few charts though that tell their own stories, and suggest the gulf between the hemispheres was actually pretty wide, with maybe the odd curveball thrown in.

(NB — all Scotland numbers relate to the Test against Australia only.)


CHART 1 – POSSESSION

While it doesn’t give you the whole story, it sure gives you a hint at who was ‘playing the most footy’ (or at least attempting to). Australia and South Africa are noticeable for the amount of ball they held and continuity they created.

We all know though that possession isn’t everything, and the team that came away averaging 5 tries and 41 points a game — New Zealand — didn’t need all that pill to score those points. That’s probably got more to do with the fact they broke more tackles (26) and made more offloads (10) and line breaks (4) than all other teams over that period.

It was also interesting to see how some of the home nations team tactics changed over the three Test series. Wales, for example, averaged 112 ruck/mauls per match in the Six Nations, and completed 114 in the first Test against the Wallabies. In the following two Tests they completed just 60 and then 74, as they sought to tighten the matches.


CHART 2 – TERRITORY

Foiling the suggestion that perhaps the home nations played a cannier game are the territory stats.

It’s an unusual thing for international territory stats to be too far from 50/50; however, all three Southern Hemisphere teams dominated this metric as well.

Again, just to demonstrate that simple stats don’t ever give you the whole picture, guess in which Test New Zealand had its lowest amount of both territory and possession? That’s right, the one they won 60-0.


CHART 3 – DEFENCE

It doesn’t get any better for the North. Unless you have superhuman defence, weathering that much possession will yield high missed tackle counts. Which of course made the Scots superhuman when they managed to only miss 9 tackles over 136 ruck/mauls as they basked in the Glaswegian conditions of Newcastle.

Going into The Rugby Championship, one team’s defence I’ll have my eye on is South Africa’s. They missed about 1 in 5 over their last two Tests against a pretty unimaginative young English side.


CHART 4 – ERRORS

So here’s the real curveball. I certainly didn’t expect to see two things:

  1. An Australian team festooned with labels like ‘inconsistent’ being the most error-free of all the nations, even with the huge amounts of ball they held. What happened — new spray?
  2. The ice-cold world champs New Zealand down the bumbling end of the scale. And no, it wasn’t that tight game against the Irish that skewed their scores; they actually made their fewest number of errors in that test (10, 7, 10).

Go figure.


CHART 5 – SCRUM INFRINGEMENTS

If the Wallabies have outperformed in a couple of dimensions, here’s one you won’t be surprised to see them flunking. More than one-third of all Australian scrums resulted in an infringement awarded against them. We on average conceded both more penalties (2.3) and more free kicks (1.8) than any other team in this analysis over the June period.

These are at levels that cost Tests — see what almost happened in the third against Wales — and will be painting a big red bullseye on the gold eight for oppositions and referees alike.

So there you have it — the series by the numbers.

Is it what you saw in numbers, or just more damned lies and statistics?

 

All stats thanks to Rucking Good Stats

Discussion

  • RockyElboa

    Great work Matt, interesting stuff
    I must admit I am suprised by the seconds between error stats. Would be interesting to know what part of the field these errors are made.

    • http://www.ruckingoodstats.com RuckinGoodStats

      Yup I collect that and Matt has it in the spreadsheet I sent across. It is divided up into 4 quarters of the field.

      • RockyElboa

        Thanks
        I look forward to Matt providing the info

  • Red Kev

    I opened this story having misread the title as “5 Killer Chants from …” and was expecting a story about funny heckles yelled by drunken spectators.
    It was still interesting to see the stats you put up, but I can’t pretend I’m not a little disappointed.

    • Westo

      GAGR have done some great analytics in the past, but this is one the best. Well Done!

      I understand it tough to represent all key areas like ball retention vs Iine breaks / offloads / penetration etc etc, but this certainly paints a nice picture that the Championship “should” show case some nice rugby.

      Well lets hope so, in any case.

  • The Battered Slav

    Nice number crunching gagr.

    I am quite surprised to see the Wallabies top some of these stats (except the scrum penalty one of course).

    The lack of handling errors surprised me the most though.

    One thing that I was thinking after I read these figures, is that with the amount of dominance the Wallabies showed in the stats, why did this not show in the scorelines of the final two tests.

    I am thinking that the Wallabies still manage to fluff way too much, perhaps not with handling errors as evidenced by the second last chart, but with silly or inopportune play, which although not handling errors, should be considered errors all the same.

    If there were a poor option taking chart, I suspect the Wallabies might have had a pretty solid showing on that too.

    But all in all, not bad on the face of it with most of those figures, and cause for some confidence going into the rugby chamionship I suppose….

    • ooaahh

      I think this is in part due to game plan. We make fewer mistakes playing a less imaginative game. The allblacks on the other hand played high risk high reward rugby. That may hurt them against better opposition (although i doubt it).

    • http://www.ruckingoodstats.com RuckinGoodStats

      The ABs started, including SBW, dropping the ball like hot spud, then after about 15 minutes like they had magic glue on their hands it the handling errors were reduced.

  • Fin

    Great Work Matt.

    I suspect the low error rate for the Wallabies probably had alot to do with our selected 10 and the game we played around him, solid and consistent. Had Quade or Kurtley played at 10 we may have had more errors but more oppurtunities as well. Would also be interested in what exactly clasifies a handling error- does Horne’s no pass that bombed a try count as an error, in other words are you rewarded in these stats for being too conservative?

    The last stat as always is the most troubling, are we at the stage where we pick our best scrummaging eight and then get what we can from them in the line out and general play? I think our problems go further than just the front row. Who are our best scrummaging locks and number eight?

    • http://www.ruckingoodstats.com RuckinGoodStats

      My handling errors are ‘as determine by the ref’ otherwise is can get a bit subjective. That’s not to say the ref call isn’t, just wanted a standard that could be applied across all the games. I break them further into handling error that stopped play and handling errors that the ref signalled advantage and that advantage was taken.

  • RedMan

    Aus had the highest amount of time spent in Opp 22, and yet, we didn’t score that many tries across the tests. This is probably a mix of Welsh defence and not a huge amount of creativity from our backline.

    It’d be interesting to understand how many penalties Wales gave away inside their own 22 that effectively shut down any Wallabies momentum.

    • http://www.ruckingoodstats.com RuckinGoodStats

      Wales conceded (as determined by the ref) 8 out of their 35 penalties inside the Welsh 22, so 22.9%.

      As a comparision the Welsh in the 2012 6 nations they conceded 18 out of 51 or 35%.

      Can’t say if it Wales were infringing to stop momentum or not as that is a bit subjective.

      • RedMan

        Yeah, fair enough. Thanks for the stats. Great stuff.

      • James

        Tries per min in opp 22, that’d be interesting and no doubt not good for us.

  • Steve

    For a complete and detailed history of Australian rugby over the past decade, refer to chart #5.

  • Robson

    Great stats for sure. How come we didn’t score more tries then?

  • p.Tah

    We don’t offload in the tackle or support the man with the ball who gets over the gain line as well as the All Blacks do.

    • http://www.ruckingoodstats.com RuckinGoodStats

      Sorry cat walked across the keyboard, see my offload stat below.

  • http://www.ruckingoodstats.com RuckinGoodStats

    Australia were averaging 4.75 offloads per game in the June test, New Zealand were averaging 10.0 offloads in the June tests.

  • Jimbo81

    How can anything be drawn from those stats? The team selected was Australia-A

    Horne & McCabe in the centers
    Berrick Barnes at 10
    Vuna on the wing

    When you select only 3 Reds players, you know the side is a joke!

    • p.Tah

      I agree, 3 Reds players is way too many. Absolute joke ;)

      • Fin

        Now that Burgo has gone to france we have no choice but to go with Genia. And I think you are harsh on Digby, he has covered Lachie Turners spot quite well. Higgers is now a Rebel so that’ll look better by the RC.

        The obviuos error Deans had made is Finger on the bench instead of T Carter. Go figure.

  • murph

    Poor scrum and lack of try scoring ability. Yet, neither the centres nor the front row will be changed

    • The Other Dave

      I see what you’re saying, but the (sad) truth of the matter is that the Waratahs have the strongest front row in Australia – we need a top-down rethink of how we develop our front row, all lack consistently good technique, and all lack a gamesman’s nous.
      As for an attacking centre pairing, where do we go? Tapuai looked dangerous with ball in hand early in the year but he’s still out… do we throw Barnes at 12 and put Quade/Beale at 10? I wish they’d gave A Faingaa more game time at 13, all I really saw of him was one penetrating run, and feel he should have been given more of a crack in the third test, if nothing else just to cast an eye on how he performs across a game.
      And it’s hard to gauge because he plays in a subpar backline in Perth, but I wonder whether the Honey Badger would step up…

      • JJJ

        Tahs have the strongest front row of the Aussie conference, that doesn’t mean each member of that front row is the best at his position in Australia. We’ve seen time and again that where scrums are concerned the step up from superugby level to internationals is a big one.

        I’ve heard a lot of scrum enthusiasts agree that Palmer is the best scrummaging tighthead prop we have. He’s probably been tarred in Deans’ mind by the Scotland loss now, but my recollection is that he had a solid game. Maybe not spectacular around the field, but neither was Kepu.

      • murph

        JJJ is correct. The Tahs scrum, as a unit, looks the best but that doesn’t make it an international front row. Robinson, Moore and Palmer are the best individual scrummagers and tgat combo should be given a chance. BA should be dumped in favour of Holmes or Slipper.

        Wrt to the midfield it should be Cooper/Barnes or Barnes/O’Connor or O’Connor/Barnes at 10/12 with AAC or Faingaa or Smith or O’Connor at 13

        Either way, Barnes needs to be there as a level head for either Cooper or O’Connor

  • http://howtopassmatric.co.za/ Paul @ How To Pass Matric

    Great stats. We really should have performed better

  • mad italian flyhalf

    Great stats! Congratulations and many thanks for this point of view!

    Hope similar stats will be posted in November, when northern players will be fresher than now and maybe the missed-tackles count (and rate) will be reversed.

    Maybe…….. or maybe not. :)

  • AJ

    I’d like to see Palmer get a start at TH and Kepu to the bench and BA get the axe. Palmer last time i check had the least number of penalties awarded against him out of all Oz props. Reliability that’s what we need.

    Backline – ditch Horne, McCabe at OC with Barnes at IC. the rest obvious.

  • Ath

    Close games reduce errors and scores.

    Given the weakened team and Wales good form we have come out of it well. Except for the obvious.

    I predict Palmer is going to get more gametime. And were our locks pushing their weight?

    • murph

      Palmer should get more game time but selection for Australia doesnt entirely hinge on either performance or form

  • Jimbo81

    Deans throws darts at names on a board – selection is completely random

  • cmarshment

    I noticed during the All Blacks Ireland series that the All Blacks had trouble with ball retention and made a lot of erros. What these stats seem to confirm is that the All blacks more than any other team were pushing passes, trying for offloads, and attempting to play at an incredible pace.

    When you do that your going to make alot of errors. But when it comes off we get the kind of results we saw in the last test – a black wash.

Close