• Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums. As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.

Wallabies vs All Blacks 10th August @Optus Stadium Perth

KOB1987

Rod McCall (65)
Reasonable argument that there is only space for one of Hooper or Pocock in a matchday 23. Not much point taking two 7s, particularly with Samu who covers all three spots.

There's plenty of point when one is Hooper and the other is Pocock.
 

Joe Blow

Peter Sullivan (51)
I’d say so. Naisarani brings exactly what was needed to compliment the pooper. With Pocock we also all of a sudden have massive breakdown presence and increased defensive capability. He gets through at least as much work as any tight 5 player.

If he remains fit Cheika will probably mix it up a bit but revert to the pooper for the big games.
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
Reasonable argument that there is only space for one of Hooper or Pocock in a matchday 23. Not much point taking two 7s, particularly with Samu who covers all three spots.


Pocock covers 7 and 8, and as much as big fan of Samu - Pocock would get the bench spot behind Hooper every day of the week. And yes you could argue for Pocock starting over Hooper but no point going there. And that means unless injury means Samu sadly would miss out on match day 23.
 

KOB1987

Rod McCall (65)
I’d say so. Naisarani brings exactly what was needed to compliment the pooper. With Pocock we also all of a sudden have massive breakdown presence and increased defensive capability. He gets through at least as much work as any tight 5 player.

If he remains fit Cheika will probably mix it up a bit but revert to the pooper for the big games.

Interestingly I think Pocock would have to play 7 to maximise the breakdown presence and Hooper play 6, his style is more of a 6 anyway, without the size. No-one has stepped up at 6, I reckon it will happen. Subject to Poey's fitness of course.
 

Up the Guts

Steve Williams (59)
No disrespect to LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) because I think he’s a great bench lock option but apart from the lineout playing the Pooper with Naisarani can only be an upgrade from LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto). He had something like 5 touches and 4 of them were turnovers conceded. I wish Valetini had got a shot in the last few games though, he seems to have the best skillset of any 6 we have.
 

Viking

Mark Ella (57)
Reasonable argument that there is only space for one of Hooper or Pocock in a matchday 23. Not much point taking two 7s, particularly with Samu who covers all three spots.

Pocock covers all 3 spots too? Cheika has played him at 6 and 8 in the past.

I'd rather Pocock then Samu, unlucky for Samu but that's the reality.
 

Viking

Mark Ella (57)
I’d say so. Naisarani brings exactly what was needed to compliment the pooper. With Pocock we also all of a sudden have massive breakdown presence and increased defensive capability. He gets through at least as much work as any tight 5 player.

If he remains fit Cheika will probably mix it up a bit but revert to the pooper for the big games.



All true around the park...except we lose a solid line-out option.
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
Pocock covers all 3 spots too? Cheika has played him at 6 and 8 in the past.



I'd rather Pocock then Samu, unlucky for Samu but that's the reality.



I hope at least Samu gets RWC squad place as if he was to miss out I would feel after his Super Rugby season form he would have every reason to feel very unlucky.
 

dru

Tim Horan (67)
Pocock covers all 3 spots too? Cheika has played him at 6 and 8 in the past.

I'd rather Pocock then Samu, unlucky for Samu but that's the reality.

Having played there does not mean he covers the position. He covers 7. 7 only. Outside that you play him out of position.
 

Up the Guts

Steve Williams (59)
So...wait... we like the Pooper now?
Well, it’d be an upgrade on LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) at 6 but then again most combinations would. I’d like to see Valetini or Dempsey given a shot (even Jones despite his dumb shit on Saturday) before we try the Pooper though.
 

Hawko

Tony Shaw (54)
Pocock covers all 3 spots too? Cheika has played him at 6 and 8 in the past.

I'd rather Pocock then Samu, unlucky for Samu but that's the reality.


This is all predicated on a 5:3 bench. If Cheika runs a 6:2 bench then Samu, Hooper and Pocock could play, but probably only one of those three would start. I would start Jones next week to give him a chance to show what he's got. He's not the sort of player you give 15 minutes to show impact, he's more of a workhorse 6 who can get around the park. IMO he's a better balance for the backrow, particularly against the Darkness.

Given the flexibility we have in the backs, we could probably cover 10-15 with just one player - say JOC (James O'Connor) or Pez's other half.
 
Top