• Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums. As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.

The Wallabies Thread

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
Agree, also Simmo was, from what I saw, pretty soft around the b/down. Hanigan looked far better and it was late in the game. I think he needs a good break, maybe he is carrying injuries.


Simmon's issue has always been consistency IMHO, he has looked really good at times for the Wobs and at other times disinterested.
 
T

TOCC

Guest
Agree, also Simmo was, from what I saw, pretty soft around the b/down. Hanigan looked far better and it was late in the game. I think he needs a good break, maybe he is carrying injuries.

I agree, based on form, I actually supported Hannigans selection..
but didn't see the merit in Dempsey, Simmons or Douglas..
 

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
I agree, based on form, I actually supported Hannigans selection..
but didn't see the merit in Dempsey, Simmons or Douglas..

And Hanigan is still too green. Actually, I haven't seen anything from Hanigan to suggest he will soon, or ever, be up to test match standard, but I do see a bit in Dempsey. It's just that Dempsey missed the whole (or nearly) of the Super Rugby season and without any form to his name this year has strolled into the Wallabies. Any wonder that many of us think Cheika has a mindset to go to the Tahs for players over other teams? I suspect, being Sydney based, he gets to see a whole lot more of the Tahs players (though that wouldn't explain Dempsey this year) than any others.
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
I really struggle to understand why the national coach would favour players from a particular franchise indiscriminately.


Why on earth would he do that? Is he getting bribed? Is he just stupid?
 

Scrubber2050

Mark Ella (57)
I really struggle to understand why the national coach would favour players from a particular franchise indiscriminately.

Why on earth would he do that? Is he getting bribed? Is he just stupid?

The last word I would describe Chek with, is "stupid"

He is intelligent, engaging one on one, motivating and basically a very good coach.

However he is very parochial as seen by some of his left field selections and retaining under performing blokes for several tests and incredibly stubborn and to the point that his team (and the results and culture) suffers.
 

dru

Tim Horan (67)
Wait. So you're saying that Rob Simmons is back in the Wallabies side because he's now a Tah?? LOL. Your hatred of the Tahs has no limits. I'm not saying he's been great, I think the thing is he's the least worst of the available options, that can also run a lineout.


Look, get with the picture. That eff'n Blue Jersey wearing Simmons is getting in the road of a perfectly good Rodda. I mean, hell, what does Rodda have to do to start?!?

Next thing you'll be suggesting that Moore not being in the team has nothing to do with his Red jersey. Or that Kerevi on the bench has something to do with defence or some other conspiracy.

#Too many Tahs!

:)
 
T

TOCC

Guest
I really struggle to understand why the national coach would favour players from a particular franchise indiscriminately.

Why on earth would he do that? Is he getting bribed? Is he just stupid?

Because he has 2 assistant coaches who both worked for the Tahs the past 2 years, Cheika has personally coached and played a roll in recruiting some of those Tahs players, and because he lives in Sydney Cheika probably gets to see more Tahs training session and matches in person the he does for the other teams.

It's not unreasonable to expect Cheika to favour a player he has more knowledge of.
 

TSR

Mark Ella (57)
Every coach has favourites. I think it was Tim Sheens who once spoke how coaches considered personality traits when selecting, so would default to players they knew well. I'm not saying every conspiracy theory is justified, but I am surprised people find the suggestion of favouritism such an affront.
 

Derpus

George Gregan (70)
Because he has 2 assistant coaches who both worked for the Tahs the past 2 years, Cheika has personally coached and played a roll in recruiting some of those Tahs players, and because he lives in Sydney Cheika probably gets to see more Tahs training session and matches in person the he does for the other teams.

It's not unreasonable to expect Cheika to favour a player he has more knowledge of.

and jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
 

Derpus

George Gregan (70)
Every coach has favourites. I think it was Tim Sheens who once spoke how coaches considered personality traits when selecting, so would default to players they knew well. I'm not saying every conspiracy theory is justified, but I am surprised people find the suggestion of favouritism such an affront.
Because it's dumb as fuck? Cheika is a highly paid professional not some snot nosed kid picking his mates first for dodgeball.

Maybe there are some inherent biases that occur in a person's subconscious. Hell i'd even say that's likely. But nothing even remotely close to all the raging derps on this forum spouting 'too many tahs hurr durr' every second post.
 

barbarian

Phil Kearns (64)
Staff member
Can you name a Wallaby coach in history whose selections were logical, consistent and transparent?

The fact is that every single Wallaby coach has had favourites the fans didn't agree with, ignored players who appeared to be obvious choices, and chopped and changed in confusing fashion.

In the time of this forum, I recall similar angst over selections by Link, Deans and Knuckles alike.

The fact is that maybe, just maybe, there are things that us internet genii don't see!?!?!

That obviously doesn't mean the coach is right all the time (or that we are wrong), but that it's a delicate art and there are far more factors that go into it than what we see and think.
.
 
T

TOCC

Guest
I don't think you need to overcomplicate it... he is either playing good rugby and deserves his position, or he isn't
 
  • Like
Reactions: dru

Killer

Cyril Towers (30)
It's when those decisions turn out to be good decisions that people begin to trust his decisions.
Clearly because of the supporter sentiment and the win/loss results they haven't been that good.
 

Braveheart81

Will Genia (78)
Staff member
It's when those decisions turn out to be good decisions that people begin to trust his decisions.
Clearly because of the supporter sentiment and the win/loss results they haven't been that good.


You don't get to see the alternative though and have no idea whether it would have been more successful.

A substantial amount of supporter sentiment is based around players people like and don't like. Most of us would like to see Timani have more involvement in this team but his form has been poor and he can't even shine at NRC level right now.

I absolutely wouldn't be selecting Dempsey and would certainly shuffle Hanigan out of the starting 6 jersey for at least a couple of games to look at some alternatives but no one knows whether those alternative selections would be faring better.
 

Derpus

George Gregan (70)
It's like being a political leader. The voters only see the things that go wrong, never the crises that are avoided or the things that go right.
 
Top Bottom