This is an excellent point and one I feel people who insist the current GPS/CAS/ISA structures need to be maintained forget. Your jersey isn't.
I believe Oakhill got up over St. Pats - scores were close
I believe that all schools in the Central West have been told not to head over the hill until further notice. Kinross, Stannies, Scots All Saints..
Can I ask as to why Dundas Valley were forcibly removed in 2005?
I agree with QH -it's not a binary argument - schools and clubs have a role to play in developing Rugby (and all sports), but schools in.
Perhaps but. It's still not a pathway to a national team, it's the end of the line for that pathway - it's its own thing - not connected to a.
Considering the open scholarship market within Queensland schools, the thought that they could get their best players into a forward pathway.
In most sports yes. The school pathway ends with a presentation night, nice plaque, a certificate, perhaps some cake.
Club pathways lead to.
I'm not sure why it's essential that you have to be still at school to get access to a performance pathway?
But in any case -
Why is it worrying QH? All of those WA school boys are now playing in the academy team with some early school leavers as well. It's the same.
I'd argue that once that set up was up and running, no team would dare want to leave it. Hills may have designs on travelling further afield,.
You're assuming that the schools would be receptive to such a meeting. It would need to work on the assumption that the schools have the best.
Tend to agree with this. If QLD had done a better job of integrating the new system with the old one, I dont think we'd be getting the push.
A sensible move and I'm glad it's happened.
Agreed - keep them coming!
Separate names with a comma.