Recent content by notapatrioticboneinme

was i imagining it or did wales make a habit of sealing off rucks whilst an aus player got pinged for same questionably ?

yep brain fade on my part

4.5/1 means that if you successfully back a winner for an outlay of $1 the bookmaker will return to you your $1 and $4.5 of his

my error read the 4.5/1 as odds of 4.5 as modern day and 9/2 as the old wayi i'm definitely wrong, put it down to PTSD, the brain hasn't been right for a while

been a 'punter' since '73 melbourne cup and they are NOT the same 4.5/1 is 11/2 not 9/2 a tad confusing since different ways of odds were used

cacked myself > if nz forwards can deal with english eight then nz backs will rip england backs > nz by as many as they need, which would be 1 south africa @ $1.41 worth a very large wager on my part methinks

... could never be that bad; gave up on rugby when they gave up on scrums; it's a lot like touch and i always loathed touch

$1.20 SA -2.5, did i say ridiculously good value ...

300 000 thousand conservatively > familial history, dad compulsive, both grandfathers were SP bookies at one stage, have no self-control except i have only played a pokie once, lost 20cents and realised it was pure luck and have never entered a casino best thing, by far, is that none of my five...

I have traded on sports betting since it was available, decades ago ... the thoroughbreds too have lost at least $300 000 since '73 (lost $200 on a melbourne cup favourite, my first ever bet) have kept data on my transactions and the only rule that i have managed to stick to is NEVER to back or...

sio arnold korobete

Arnold! you obviously suffering post-loss delusion mate

england won fair and square and deserved it but Arnold being penalised, shocking decision i'm not dirty i won on the match just garces drives me crazy

england, a superior 9-10, a superior kicker, unsettled aus backline england by 15 - 25

FY if i had said, " will struggle to get to 46", my post would have been vindicated you should really familiarise yourself with the definition of 'trolling' no more, we obviously speak different languages ...