That's the issue,if there was a gift coming from the mad monk,only those in his image would qualify.At the moment Abbott could give everyone $10,000,000 and the latte set would find something wrong about it
The past 10-15 years of the war on terror in Afghanistan and Iraq has resulted in so many young Muslims becoming more radicalised.
The concept of a rogue Islamic state was a pipedream before the US invaded Afghanistan yet now it is a reality. The horse has bolted as far as the whole IS thing is concerned. I read yesterday that they now control an area bigger than Jordan.
It's not like it is just a few radicals in some remote village somewhere.
It will be interesting to see what the path forward is. Clearly turning countries into a war zone for a decade or more doesn't calm a situation. It just turns people into radicals, particularly young people who have grown up in war and don't know any different and just see the west as their oppressor.
That's the issue,if there was a gift coming from the mad monk,only those in his image would qualify.
PPL being a perfect example.
If the debt issue is such a problem,why is he proposing to gift $50k (originally $100k) to wealthy people?
If we accept Labor's understanding of the economy, everything is rosy, so no problem.He couldn't actually: there's a budget emergency.
The past 10-15 years of the war on terror in Afghanistan and Iraq has resulted in so many young Muslims becoming more radicalised.
The concept of a rogue Islamic state was a pipedream before the US invaded Afghanistan yet now it is a reality. The horse has bolted as far as the whole IS thing is concerned. I read yesterday that they now control an area bigger than Jordan.
It will be interesting to see what the path forward is. Clearly turning countries into a war zone for a decade or more doesn't calm a situation. It just turns people into radicals, particularly young people who have grown up in war and don't know any different and just see the west as their oppressor.
Check out the voting results, 95% in favour of double dissolution.
I can only assume that most of those wanting to go back to the polls have a message for the incumbents...
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...-sales-job-20140822-1073fu.html#ixzz3Azpnk4pw
That's the issue,if there was a gift coming from the mad monk,only those in his image would qualify.
PPL being a perfect example.
If the debt issue is such a problem,why is he proposing to gift $50k (originally $100k) to wealthy people?
whereas I disagreed with it, pregnancy is a self inflicted wound, pay,plan to pay, compromise your lifestyle for your f*ckin kids, if you can't afford them don't have them, simples
Most people who were against it were because it is completely inequitable.In fairness he was putting a new levy on the biggest public companies to pay for it, whilst I disagree with the spend, those clowns pay far too little tax and could afford it.
What did amuse me was watching the left come out against better maternity leave benefits - WTF?
Probably that it wasn't generous enough.Yep, far too generous to some, but that still amuses me to see the left fight against something that they sort of want
I do wonder if Gillard put it up whether the shrill would have been different
I try to stay out of this thread but I can't help myself.
Where do big companies get there money from? By selling stuff to us. To say we wouldn't pay for the PPLS is rediculous.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using Tapatalk