Search results

I do not think the S word is a factor with any player who prioritises league.

If it is made clear that participation in School sport is the priority then there should not be any confusion. There shouldn’t be a hard decision. It is a mutual agreement and in life you are expected to honour your agreements. This only gets difficult if you have made multiple agreements...

Good to hear.

Why do schools allow this? Why does rugby allow this?

If true this is ridiculous. They should be barred from any rugby rep honour including GPS. There should also be an enquiry into Newingtons compliance with the rules of the AAGPS.

Soz, seems I caused you some upset. I understood why the grandstand faced the wrong way but thanks for explaining for everyone else. I also understood you hadn’t run out of money. The colour coded fund raising of the school is famous from the slopes of Balmoral to the heights of Cremorne.

If you can’t play rugby in it I don’t care.

No

Probably hard for both Scots and Kings to win

My tips; Scots +10 Shore + 15 New + 5

Perhaps you can run some English lessons for them.

Only one answer. Joeys.

Is this the AAGPS thread?

I agree, CAS would compete well in GPS 3rd grade

You need clearance from RA for an U16 prop to play opens / U18. I’m not sure how hard it is to get sign off. I assume it could be insurance related.

Justice is an important part of the team but the lad who played 8 did well. The bigger issue was pushed passes and some poor options at times. Today was good prep for the comp.

I didn’t say that, what I said was not as threatening…… he was best on ground by a very substantial margin.

Yes they managed, what’s your point?

I’m not sure the first part of this statement is correct….. 10 out of 15 players today are year 12.

Yes, Auggies were full strength. 10 controlled the game beautifully. Without him Auggies would be far less threatening.