Search results

"Doesn't have the height" to play number eight? Sorry old bull but clearly you don't understand the fundamentals of rugby. The fact that you rule out a junior rugby player due to their lack of height boggles the mind and makes my gears grind. A within the pack of 8 you need three lineout...

Hey mate just so you know the Knox forwards were able to secure approximately 75% possession to secure a very dominant 36 nil win. I think it would be fair to say that the powerful forwards 1 through to 8 as well as the reserves were extremely dominant at the breakdown.

Actually BK there is one confirmed change for Knox's u16's. Hard running, no nonsense blindside flanker Jack Hoyle is confirmed to be out for the season with an impending shoulder reconstruction. With an impressive career including 16a appearances last year and a period playing for Manly reps...

Alright mate everyone needs to let a bit of steam off every once in a while good to chat and enjoy the rest of your day. Cranbrook looking strong this year in the 16's so let's get keen for a thriller

My friend do you think you could simply name who, just to provide sustenance to what you are saying? I believe numbers 1, 5 and 7 played "up" last year. Would you say these boys were not playing with the team? Just curious

As a neutral observer (Aloys) I am quite curious about these comments. Do you think you could just identify the players by number, perhaps, or by appearance? I do believe that numbers 1, 5, 7 played "up" last year. Do you think these boys were playing individually?