• Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums. As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.

Search results

  1. T

    CAS U16s 2016

    The backs were given great opportunities because he forwards really ramped it up. The number 2, 4, 6 and 8 were extremely impressive ! In the backs 14, 10 and 15 played well
  2. T

    CAS U16s 2016

    Yes according the draw and schedule. How do the CCC boys stack up? Our lads face CCC and if they can get over this teama play either ISA or Pres second 15 Saturday 25th June – Curagul Field (Bobbin Head Rd, North Turramurra) All qualification games are 40 min duration with 5 min half...
  3. T

    CAS U16s 2016

    Speaking to one of the Barker lads parents he wasn't too noticeable in the trials . Perhaps he was off colour however you can't rely on reputation
  4. T

    CAS U16s 2016

    That's a lot better than I thought - a rainabka amount of experience I the forwards then. Just losing some size then. If they play smart they can be competitive
  5. T

    CAS U16s 2016

    yeah the boys could use his experience around the paddock. its a strange call to leave him out. but who do you drop? Would you play him at 8? move trobec to where?
  6. T

    CAS U16s 2016

    That would mean that he will be asked to trial again for Opens - a little odd that he would be requested to trrial for 16s as well then? Perhaps your off the mark on this one
  7. T

    CAS U16s 2016

    Valid point - lots of good players in waiting due to their position having a stronger player above.
  8. T

    CAS U16s 2016

    Have to agree that the backs look good to very good. Forwards seem to lack size against their larger GPS counterparts. Perhaps the key therefore is mobility and determination, use the mobilify with a short passing game in amongst the forwards and get it to the kickers and quicks
Top