Quick Hands
David Wilson (68)
Omitting Bancroft is at least justifiable. He's not in great form (ave 28 this year) and the selectors may not want to chuck him into the night/pink ball lottery against some very good swing bowlers.
There's plenty of batsmen I would have had in ahead of Smarsh though.
The Marsh family do know where the bodies are buried.
I agree that Bancroft has done himself no favours in his last match, but he scored 111 against SA 10 days ago (SMarsh scored 92 in the same match).
Bancroft has scored 171 runs at 28 and SMarsh has scored 207 runs at 34, so it's not as if Marsh is in Bradmanesque form. Not much difference at all considering they've each played only 6 innings.
To me it just points to more confusing selections - I just can't fathom the obsession that the selectors have with guys in their mid 30s who are nothing more than good first class cricketers.