As Godfrey says, you've formed a position without understanding it. Now you're looking for arguments to support it.
I am pretty sure that Pappy was not allowed back in, that was the straw that broke the camel's back for many of us who had been happy with amateurism for many years.
Papworth definitely "came back" and played in the lower grades at Eastwood but it may have been after rugby had gone professional and the embargo had been lifted.
Fair enough, I was overseas at that time, so obviously missed the whole story. I do remember the controversy, though.
The irony is that a lot of club rugby players played league, or tried out for league teams, without any particular fuss being made.
They may not have been paid.
There's been a quite strong history of sports excluding professionals. Cricket, Rugby and most notably The Olympics.
Campo of course was making a motzah playing in Italy, well before professionalism.
.
Actually, what the French RU did in the 40's to RL in France in cahoots with the Vichy Government was pretty despicable from what I have read on it, but hey, they're French, and it was during a war. How long are you going to carry the chip? As I have pointed out:
Any time one body splits off from another over ideological issues, there’s going to be acrimony and the incumbent body is going to take steps to protect its position from the newly emerged competitor. What do you think is going to happen? It’s the law of the jungle.
Great thread Karl, you wannabe blue blood.
LOL, you're going to give us an education about Rugby and throw a few back huh?
You have proved in this thread and all the other threads at LU that you really don't have a fucking clue about RL let alone Union.
Dumbarse.
Oh, and if it wasn't for RL, union would've stayed dead in qld, and union did play games during ww1.
And the original rabbitohs were the wallaby's.
Need to know some more?