Dwyer’s view: Aussie Teams Shine – at last!

Bob Dwyer May 14, 2012 75

No GravatarOn Saturday night, I had decided on my “headline” for this week’s article – “The Rebels are the Real Deal” – and then, on Sunday, came the Reds astonishing rout of the high-flying Chiefs. New headline needed!

Just a few weeks back I was bemoaning the form of most of the Aussie teams – the Brumbies being the exception – and now we have victories over the two in-form teams of NZ rugby; the Rebels astonishing and well-deserved win over the Crusaders and the Reds “back from the edge of the grave” to register the first Chiefs’ defeat since Round 1.

Despite the Rebels’ five-try, two bonus point defeat to the Bulls – no mean feat – just one week ago, I was fearing a bloodbath at the hands of the in-form Crusaders. How wrong could I have been? 18 months ago, I acknowledged my support for Rebels’ head coach, Damien Hill, based on the quality technique displayed by his Sydney Uni teams – this quality under pressure of game situations has always been, for me, the sign of a quality coach.

Recently though, I had begun to question my assessment, especially given the distinct lack of technique in the support lines of the Rebels fowards and Nick Phipps’ consistent slow and inaccurate passing. Lo and behold, what a turn-around! Five tries against the Bulls in a quality display full of character was followed, one week later, by a deserved win against the all-time Super Rugby champs, the Crusaders. During the game, at different points, I made the following notes:

Morty revived for the Rebels (photos care of @GoodDay_ToYou)

  • Kurtley Beale is a genius.
  • Peyper is a joke; Crockett is the problem.
  • Crusaders’ forwards consistently take the space in front of the ball at the tackle.
  • Gerrard’s kicking makes him man-of-the match.
  • Rebels support lines to the tackled player/s allowed for early pass or off-load to keep pressure on the Crusaders’ defence.
  • Rebels in for the kill – a sure sign of a hungry team.
  • Impressed by Robinson, Pyle, Neville, Delve, Phipps, Beale, Vuna, Gerrard. (The whole team actually played well, but I especially noted these.)

The Rebels now look “the real deal” and can go forward from here. As I said to one of their senior members during last week, they “seem to have played with more character!”

The Reds had improved the previous weekend against the Crusaders – perhaps not as good as the Reds’ one-man cheer-squad of Greg Martin would have us believe, but improving. [Incidentally, Greg described the Reds four point loss to the Crusaders as “full of merit”, but referred to the Waratahs being “overwhelmed” by the same Crusaders, by the same four-point margin!]

This week, v the table-topping Chiefs, at the 36 minute mark, the Reds were shot. The score was 8-22 and the Reds could not get any controlled scrum ball at all. Then a determined try to Ben Lucas, right on the stroke of half-time, gave them a glimmer of hope. The half-time break showed, yet again, how tactically astute Ewen McKenzie is. Scrums seemed to virtually disappear from the game – you statisticians can give us the accurate numbers – pick and go was now the order of the day and when the ball did shift wider, continuous play was achieved via tight support lines.

Will Genia, apparently free from the pressures of “contract negotiations”, played last week with tons of commitment and spirit. This week, he added quality to all he did. This has been a transformation and he gave his team the momentum and, indeed, the life-line. They all responded and there was virtually nothing the Chiefs could do to stem the Red tide. Liam Gill has risen along with Genia – albeit from a different level – and was a significant contributor to the outcome. Greg Martin had correctly predicted an intriguing battle between the scavenging of Gill and the running skills of the Chiefs’ backrow. The late, great Dave Brockhoff was often wont to say, “You can’t get Utopia in the backrow”, but the Chiefs’ selectors will try harder next time to get closer to Utopia. The Reds have genuine pace – how did Genia skin Masaga? – across the pitch and they executed a lot more accurately, although still more improvement is needed.

I was impressed with Simmons again, Gill, Genia, Lucas, Ioane and Shipperly. Horwill did excellently at the lineout and restarts, but I still want more from him in the “tight-loose”, and Wallace-Harrison and Robinson made great contributions as “Link’s finishers”. Morahan – and perhaps his team – will be extremely grateful that the referee’s assistant was conveniently wearing a blindfold and was “unable to get a number”, enabling him to escape a potentially damaging yellow card for a lift tackle. We may yet hear more about this. This was a significant and season-changing victory for the Reds.

The Waratahs, as they did against the Crusaders, continue to show more in some aspects of their game, only to be sadly let down in others. They definitely lifted their numbers and leg-drive at the tackle – some of the time – but their inconsistency let them down. For example, in the 31st minute, Rocky Elsom took advantage of quickly recycled ball, to charge through the heart of the Bulls defence, but subsequent lack of quick support at his tackle allowed the Bulls to immediately snuff out any threat.

With the notable exception of Rob Horne’s break for an excellent early try, the Tahs attack was totally fundamental, asking no questions at all of the defence. Why didn’t they try the same again; the play must have 3 or 4 options? On the plus side, the Waratahs scrum was dominant – when have we been able to claim any sort of dominance in the scrum? – although this was not acknowledged by referee Pollock, when he doled out the scrum penalties. At the tackle also, I would question Pollock and two – against Elsom in the first half and Timani in the second – should have gone the other way, to my mind.

In the end, it was the Bulls superior ability to close out the game that won them the day. Skipper, Rocky Elsom, commented that it was “their ability to control field position at the end of the game” that spelled the difference. Indeed, in this period, the Bulls never looked like losing. From the 75th minute, the Waratahs conceded two lineouts and a 5 metre scrum turn around, when Lopeti Timani inexplicably tried to go the long way around a wheeled scrum. How? Why?

In some ways, the Waratahs may have been the better team, but lost – again! They continue to be badly let down by dreadfully inaccurate passing, their kicking game is totally inadequate and their numbers at the tackle still inconsistent. Berrick Barnes is as big a culprit as anyone in the first two of these. I want the concept of forwards “reloading” at the tackle to be removed from the vocabulary of Aussie players. Then we might be capable of pressuring defences and make space for our talented backs. Kepu was great on the tight-head; he could yet be a star. AAC was good as ever. Elsom and Ulugia made significant contributions and both scrum-halves likewise.

The Force were dreadful. They looked tired and lethargic. Mark Lawrence was equally off the pace. I was delighted when the siren sounded.

Discussion »

  • Bones

    Thanks Bob

    Re the Waratahs, the first blame must surely go to the contracting commitee- journeymen players have been chosen. The second must be Berrick – he is just not an instinctual player. He struggles to inspire anything.

    Also Dave Pocock, despite a heart like a lion, is a fighter, not a winner. The Wallabies need winners in key roles – Horwill, Genia, Gill, Mowen.

    • Patrick

      Um right. So if the Reds had lost this weekend we could have struck Fill, Genia and Horwill fun the Wallaby team-sheet?

      The Force may be crap, with possible the weakest lost in the comp, but I’ll settle for Pocock in the Wallabies if that’s alright with you..NSW supporters will explain to you why.

      • Patrick

        Fucken mobile phones. I meant ‘struck Gill, … from‘ and weakest list.

      • Muffy

        As a Reds supporter (some of my posts in the past may have hinted at this) I would still pick Pocock over any 7 (6 if you are a saffa) in the tri-nations, read into that the world. he is a machine. Gill, Hooper etc are true talents, but o’cock is world class.

        Imagine Pocock to start with Gill or Hooper, on with 20 mins to go, once the Refs breakdown interpretations and timings have been worked out.. creating breakdown havoc, and finding gaps in a tiring defence …

        • bill

          you could run Pocock as a 6 and Gill as a 7 with Hooper to replace one of them at 60. Actually, it’d probably be Hooper and Pocock to start with Gill to come on.

          Hooper’s more of a ball runner than Gill at the moment.

    • Seb V

      Lol. Pocock is our best and most consistent wallaby. You dun goofed.

  • Red Kev

    I see Dwyer’s irrational hatred of Higginbotham continues with an inability to admit he was wrong and praise him. Higginbotham saved at least two tries with covering tackles and played exceptionally well around the fringes of the rucks and mauls, but we’ll not mention him playing well because it might cost NSW hacks like Dennis and Elsom a spot in the Wallabies.

    • Lindommer

      You obviously haven’t been to a Tahs’ match this year, Red Kev, Dennis has been one of their best players. Scrum, lineout, restarts, all the tight things a good pig should do. Bob doesn’t like Higgers’ propensity to shine in the loose at the expense of the bread-and-butter forward’s grunt stuff, understandably. Calling Dave a “hack” is a bit below the belt for mine.

      The Wallabies are lucky to have two good 6s competing for the same spot this year. I reckon they’ll both be needed.

      • Red Kev

        Below the belt – yeah you’re right … but what do you expect from a Queenslander coming up to Origin time?
        Dennis is playing well but is still just out of the squad still for mine. Palu, Pocock, Higginbotham and Mowen (one of these two to replace Palu after 60 mins) are the form loose forwards. Hodgson and Dennis are also playing well, but not as well as the others.

        The Higginbotham in the loose argument has never sold me – he produces memorable moments out wide but that is because he can. Elsom plays just as wide but can’t do anything with the space because he doesn’t have the skill or the pace. Thomson in NZ plays even wider.
        Regardless, this season Higginbotham has picked up his workrate in tight – the last two weeks especially he has been immense – meaning he has worked on the percieved shortcomings of his game – the mark of a player that any coach should want in their squad.

        • Muffy

          What Red Kev said…

        • RJ

          Higgers has been the best forward in the Australian conference. His quantity of involvements arent the highest (but arent exactly low), its his quality of involvements. He makes a difference with everything he does.

          Pity the rebels are going to poach him.

    • the realist

      you need two tissues… one to cry in to the other to….. well lets just say you are one.

      Higginbotham is not a good backrower! He could be but he aint. A backrowere needs to provide the quality ball not just reap the benefits of it.

      • Red Kev

        Hi matt, sorry I mean wallaby fan, sorry I mean the realist.
        If you’re going to change screen name in order to hide, you need to change your rants too.

      • Pie Thrower

        @The Realist – you and your comments belong on foxsports where the uneducated go. I love coming to this site, reading intelligent articles and peoples thoughts. Not someone ranting and looking for a reaction from other contributors. Play the ball – not the man!! Either contribute in a positive way, or rack off elsewhere.

        • the realist

          sorry pie thrower i mean red kev. did i hurt your feelings?

        • Red Kev

          Come on realist, be realistic, pie thrower doesn’t post enough to be me.

    • johnny-boy

      And he keeps bloody scoring points. What a loser ! :)

    • Bob Dwyer

      Now, Red Kev, enough of the “irrational hatred” drivel , although I understand how the word “irrational” comes readily to the minds of many Queenslanders. I will be delighted if SH ever plays to the potential which his outstanding physical characteristics would allow.

      But, here’s the real story. He frequently plays in the front jumping spot for the Reds and wins good ball – not that difficult though; I saw the 180cms (max) Brussow win one there last weekend for the Cheetahs! From that he position, he drops off to the blindside wing, where he spends a lot of time. Making those tackles from this position does not qualify them as “covering tackles” and quite frankly Quade Cooper would have made them – although his probably would have been “covering”.

      Despite the fact that the Reds (successfully) played a lot of “pick and go/drive” type plays, we still did not see a lot of SH. When he does get close, he spends a lot of time standing off the edge – not withstanding his very successful “pick and score”. For one 5 minute period of the fourth quarter, I lost him on the tv screen. I thought that he must have been subbed off. Then he appeared again and at last – enter stage left.

      Actually, if I was Wallaby coach, I might indeed pick him, on the basis that I would back myself to change his game. “Hope still springs eternal in this human breast.”

      • Red Kev

        I always thought you were just NSW bias, now I see that you just don’t watch, you simply note things and.assume they fit your already formed opinion.
        Running from thefringes of the last breakdown towards the sideline to tackle someone that is in behind the backline’s defenae is a covering tackle.
        Hammering ineffectively into an already formed ruck (because you are too slow to get there as it forms) is not “involvement” it is just poor play. Higginbotham does what he should, goes in when there is an opportunity or gets out the way of the.fetcher and.gets back in the defensive line.
        Quality of involvements differentiates Higginbothm, even when Deans gives him 5mins against Ireland in the.RWC he makes things happen.
        I see no critism of the ponderous Elsom when he is in the Waratahs backline and play stalls because he is so slow. I see no critism of Schalk Burger or Adam Thomson who appear on the wing more often than Higginbotham.
        You like your plodding NSW 6s, sasly they won’t win you matches.

        • aussie werewolf in london

          Dude you’ve just been owned. Some may say you’ve been ‘Dwyered’!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Joker

    Reds don’t have a “one man cheer squad” there are thousands upon thousands of us.

    Re horwill: watch the game again bob, look for the big man in the blue headgear…. He was EVERYWHERE!

    • Robson

      Yep, including at least one Kiwi. Meee.

    • Pedro

      I think Dwyer was just implying that Martin was a huge fan, not that the reds only have one fan.

      • Dave

        I’d like to go a step further and take it to mean that he’s a woeful commentator.

        • James

          unfortunately the martin, kearns, horan contest for worst australian commentator is a tight race.

        • Red Kev

          I love it when Horan thinks Genia has thrown a forward pass – he physically can’t bring himself to say it – every time he says “Gee, that was flat” instead.

        • muffy

          sorry, can’t agree, I think they are excellent. I love the fact that they are still loyal to their teams yet call it as they see it. They have the best understanding of the ‘soul of the game.

  • roo

    Gerrard’s boot was sublime from where I was sitting and lets not forget, he was rock solid the few times he donned the Wallaby jumper.

    • Red Kev

      Yeah it is a crying shame he doesn’t have the pace (anymore) for playing in the back three internationally. That boot of his is a thing of beauty to watch in games.

  • Muffy

    For me super sub over the weekend has to go to Adam Wallace H…

    Never really paid him much notice but on Sunday after Horwill was pulled I had a bit of a panic, (seeing as Big Jim was immense) but he impressed with intelligent play, stealing a line out, keeping the tackled player up creating a maul etc, smart breakdown play…. worlds apart from Timanis brain fart appearance….

    • johnny-boy

      AWH is probably the most under rated player in OZ. He stepped in to Horwills shoes and owned them. It’s the backups that really make the Reds. Having Beau Robinson there to mentor Gill and then coming on providing real grunt, go forward and gee up. They really are priceless. The funniest thing watching both Gill and Beau go for the same ball and of course the master comes out with the ball just to show the grasshopper who’s boss

      • bill

        And Adam W-H forced the knock on to seal last year’s final from memory.

  • Mart

    Liam Gill is really starting to step up. He looks like quality. There’s depth in the 7′s now!

    • Swat

      He’s looked good but I’ve been more impressed by Hooper…

      • the realist

        now that is the million dollar question. Hooper or Gill as Pocock’s understudy. (throw Hodgson and Alcock and even Robinson i suppose in their as well and I have to say that is our strongest position in terms of depth for the wallabies.)

        I vote Gill is better than Hooper.

        • bill

          Gill is a better player as a 7, but Hooper can be a tweener. If it’s a straight sub for Pocock it’ll be Gill every time.

  • Packy

    Reds game was fantastic to be at. Late first half before the Ben Lucas try – Genia looked to his right from the ruck, a bloke close to the field in aisle 319 screamed WRONG WAY and Genia went left to Lucas. Good call brother
    Chiefs played some great rugby too, well done Sonny Bill and their number 6

  • Joker

    Messam I believe… He played a great game, even that short ball he threw to Harris was a cracker.. Straight into the gap.

    • johnny-boy

      Liam Messam, the most talented selfish dumb ass in NZ rugby

  • http://BigFella Big Fella

    A huge thanks to the Reds and Chiefs for that match yesterday…..it was a beauty.
    The intensity was constant, the athleticism breathtaking and will to win obvious, and both teams paid each other full respect.
    It’s fantastic to see players who back themselves, take risks and so clearly play for each other. It was the irresistible force against the immoveable object.
    Credit should also go to both coaches for their positive approach of ‘anything you can do, we can do better’. Neither team took a backward step.
    I haven’t seen any complaints about the ref either and that’s a good thing.
    Elsewhere the Rebels punched above their weight against the Crusaders and played themselves to a stand still.

    These 2 matches should be compulsory viewing for the Waratahs organisation.

    Anyone else notice the difference between the Waratahs and the Reds/Brumbies/Rebels?
    The other 3 teams are enjoying themselves, laughing and thriving on their rugby while the Waratahs look like they’re depressed and terrified of making an error…..Captain Grumpy Elsom sure doesn’t seem to be lifting any spirits either, while Barnes look likes he’s either constipated or about to cry.

    • Joker

      Barnes better lift his game, simmo could out do him in the “who’s got the biggest sookface in super rugby?”competition.

  • Slim 293

    Bob mentioned that:

    “Crusaders’ forwards consistently take the space in front of the ball at the tackle.”

    And while this is true (same with the All Blacks), you can’t deny that the Reds have adopted the EXACT SAME tactic at the breakdown.

    One of the keys to Higginbotham’s try on the weekend was players such as Simmons, Horwill and co loitering off side on the Chiefs’ side of the ruck and interfering with defenders.

    I don’t like that the refs have never pulled up the Crusaders and the All Blacks on this one, but for all of the moaning that occurred in the wake of the Reds’ loss to the Crusaders last week because of such tactics is more than a tad hypocritical.

    • BloodRed

      I agree it’s a negative tactic but for too many years Oz teams have sat back and watched refs let opposing teams get away with a variety similar infringements eg halfback coming around offside at scrums to put extra pressure on our half. Could never understand why we didn’t do the same once it was clear what the refs standard was.

      Last year the reds and the wallabies finally got the idea with our favourite ref Bryce Lawrence that anything goes at the breakdown. They played accordingly and we got a superxv title and the rwc quarterfinal win (apologies to the boks) to show for it. The refs aren’t biased but they all have an area of weakness in their game management, Bryce in every area. Our reffing supremos have to take responsibility and I don’t believe it is coincidence that those areas that need most improvement in, in reffing standards are those areas that non-kiwi observers would say have been abused by new Zealand teams for years eg lazy running, scrum half offside at scrums, Richie offside, tackler rolling away the wrong way and taking the space in front of the ball.

  • AJ

    Caydern Neville stood out for me in the rebels game. Some good hits, clean lineout wins and didn’t mind throwing his weight around in the tight (that actually impressed me the most against Richie and co.). Who the hell is this guy as well, apparently only been playing for two years? Not bad for a second start. I’m picking him as a bolter for WB’s later this year.

    • Patrick

      Like so many Reds, Rebels and Brumbies, he is the illustration of how good any player can be in a well-managed and well-coached setup!

  • The Arrow

    AJ – ditto.

    I would like to see Greg Peterson given a go at the Tahs as well. The sooner Battye, Salesi Manu, Luke Jones, Neville, Pyle, Peterson are all brought on, the better.

    Simmons, who I dont rate particularly, had a good game yesterday.

    Some potentially magnificent young tight forwards on Oz rugby……

  • Bobby

    Disagree entirely about Bob’s view on what Marto thought of the two games between the Tahs and Crusaders and the Reds v Crusaders. Yes they were both only 4 points but the Waratahs never looked liked beating the Crusaders plus the reffing was worse than terrible against the Reds in Christchurch. The Reds pressured the Crusaders into playing poorly and the Tahs were not even close to that level. So I think Marto’s comments were quite valid. But everything else Bob I agree with.

    • bill

      Bob’s a former tah ain’t he, I’m sure he’s just as dissapointet by their play as most tahs fans. Just natural to bite back on occasion.

  • wallaby fan

    Great write up Bob as usual and although I don’t always agree with everything you say I love the fact that every opinion you have is backed up with evidence and reasoning and not just state parochialism ala many bloggers.

    I have changed my opinion on many aspects of the rebels and reds obviously, I mean I couldn’t be more impressed with their performances but I don’t think we can now claim there is nothing wrong with our depth after one good weekend. We are still only going to have one team through to the semis!

    I thought the Tahs performance was to a (lesser extent obviously) good and I thought they did ask questions in attack, just not consistently. AAC and Horne for instance look the best options at 12 and 13 for mine. Secretly I was hoping that would be the case from the beginning of the year (although i’d imagine Horne would play at 12). Dare I say they should be the centres for the wallabies?

    • Red Kev

      You can dare, but McCabe and Tapuai will eat them for breakfast.

      • wallaby fan

        wow red kev now that you’ve finally seen the errors in your ways in regards to mccabe i bet you now wish you’d not wasted your time slagging off mccabe for the entire 2011 season? did you finally actually watch someone play before slagging them off?

        great to see you back blogging once the reds finally won a match. fair weather rugby fan!

        • Red Kev

          No. this year McCabe can actually play 12. He was woeful last year, and Deans forcing him to play there for the wallabies was very poor coaching and selecting.
          I believe in selecting on form and recognising good performances which is why I have changed my opinion on McCabe.
          The question is are you man enough to admit Higginbotham is Australia’s best blindside flanker?

        • wallaby fan

          McCabe is playing as he was last year thats why deans picked him.

          Higginbotham the best blindside flanker in Australia? He’s not even the best blindside flanker at the reds! He’d make a great league second rower because you don’t have to compete at the breakdown and you can play as wide as you like.

        • Red Kev

          I rest my case and politely request that you go back to foxsports.com.au with the rest of the bleating horde of uninformed posters.

        • bill

          McCabe last year, like Ben McCalman, was incredibly ill served by his coach at the wallabies. He has always had certain physical attributes, but even cinderalla can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear. Maybe the tri nations crash ball gameplan would have masked McCabe’s greenness at 12…except we didn’t have a 7 you fucking dill coaches.

  • goldzy

    Bob said digby had a good game, when well he didn’t, he did try to insert himself just was never given any opportunities with space. I look forward to him hitting peak form during the test matches next months. Now i agree with everyone about no meteion of higgers. The thing that i like about himm is that he can read the game better then most players of the same posistion. This is why he is such an X factor, because he can read the game as both a back and a forward. His try was great he took a few paces back and hit the ball at pace. This is what Ben daly needs to learn, he keep going backwards every time he got the ball. Morahan played a great game heis feild posistioning was close to perfection. The conterversial tackle on SBW was rubbish. It was SBW trying to ofload that turned it in to a tip tackle. This ruling needs better clarification. Morahan put him on his arse and because it doesnt happen easily oftern, it like the ref thought maybe he should award a penilty. if he wasnt looking for the of load the tackle would have been clean. No mention of Ant fiianga he is eaislt the key to the reds backline defense, and his running game has improved a lot since 2009. ( expect big things in the future)
    Yes I am a Reds Fan so below i will put who is a must for the walabies from there squad

    Howill
    Genia
    ant Fiianga
    Digby
    Higgers

    Would love to Gill in the squad just as an understudy to pocock i think he would benifit
    Mike Harris when confident is easily austaralias best kicker
    Rob Simmons is good but i think he needs to really bulk up to better his game

    • bill

      I haven’t looked at stats but i’[d be willing to bet that Ben Daley makes more metres after contact than any other prop in the s15.

      • Patrick

        That bald guy from the Chiefs makes a few, and some of those young Saffas…

  • Hoppy35

    To Slim293… If you really want the perfect example of a forward playing the bulk of the Reds/Chiefs game offside, then you need look no further than Latimer. He was constantly unattached and in front of rucks, broke early from so many scrums I thought he was either a halfback or a waterboy and inevitably illegally obstructed Reds players coming into rucks and mauls on each occasion. NZ sides have perfected this style of illegal play and refs seem to condone it by not penalising it.

  • M

    Gill over Pocock for the Wallabies. He was instrumental in yesterday’s win, and against a pretty useful Chiefs backrow too.

    Both teams played with great adventure, so
    I hope both make it through for a rematch at playoffs time. The Chiefs clearly missed Kahui’s leadership and experience in the second half, so there could be some anxious times ahead for them.

    Also thought SBW had one of his better games. Looked eager for work and took some nice options.

    • wallaby fan

      cmon lets just take some time to think before we speak!!!! ‘Gill over Pocock’…. no need to read anything past that stupidity. Maybe one day but ffs way to over react to a good game!

    • http://BigFella Big Fella

      Here’s a few tests to help determine whether you select Pocock or Gill -

      Test A
      The All Blacks are about to kick off to you and your other Wallaby forwards. You compose yourself in readiness for the onslaught and steel a quick glance over your shoulder…….would you like to see Pocock’s face or Gill’s face staring back at you?

      Test B
      Given a choice, who would the All Blacks and South Africans choose between them in their test team?

      Test C
      Which Super Rugby pack would you prefer to play with to show your wares, the Force or Reds?

      Gill is fast becoming a great player but Pocock is great now.
      Have we forgotten just how good Pocock is and what he offers?

      • Garry

        I think we need to go back and look at last years stats. Does anybody remember the tackle counts?

        That stat alone gets ‘Poie’ the nod, let alone him topping the stats in every other facet. He’s a machine.

        Can he kick goals? Give him a crack.

      • bill

        Choice A: I wouldn’t care I’d just be by turns overjoyed to be playing and wondering just how many magic mushrooms the wallaby selectors had consumed to pick me..and still wouldn’t care, either would do the job. Choice B, they’ll pick Pocock, clearly they’re not idiots. Choice C, the Reds pack by fucking daylight.

  • Redskin

    Is mike hariss eligible for wbs. I hear hes another kiwi exile..

    • Red Kev

      MIke Harris was unwanted by Auckland (I believe he played most of his rugby in and around that city) and by virtue of an Australian grandmother qualifies as an “Australian” making him (a) not an overseas signing for the Reds and (b) eligible for the Wallabies if he wants to be.

  • BDA

    It became instantly clear last week that the injury that has probably effected the Reds the most this year was Anthony Faingaa. He really is a brick wall in the Reds backline. I definite for the wallabies squad in my view. There will be some good competition this year for the no.13 jersey (Horne, McCabe, AAC, AT are all good options).

    last year I was on the fence in terms of whether Higgers was worthy of a starting spot in the Wallabies. This year it’s a no brainer. He has been a real enforcer. Dave Dennis is also worthy of a place in the 22, however I suspect only NSW fans would pick him ahead of Higgers.

  • Timbo

    Flogging a dead horse and all but im with Bob on Higginbotham. Lets not forget he’s to blame for Drew Mitchell being out of the world cup and his subsequent ankle injuries. I like to think hes grown up after that brain fart but i dont see it.

    For those with short memories:
    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FMKVPnje1yc

    To think we went to the RWC without our two best wingers because of higgers thuggery makes me sick.

    That being said i do only see Waratah blue despite their short comings. ;-)

    • bill

      You’re a joke dude.

      • bill

        I really ought to say your reasoning is somewhat amiss but I’ll go with the previous.

      • Timbo

        Exquisite response Bill my friend. Thanks for the input. I’ll add this to my comedy routine. Should get a laugh or two.

    • Jay

      Indeed, I don’t see how Higgenbotham wasn’t banned for 2 years for that heinous crimre.

  • http://www.bobdwyerrugby.com Bob Dwyer

    Now, Red Kev, enough of the “irrational hatred” drivel , although I understand how the word “irrational” comes readily to the minds of many Queenslanders. I will be delighted if SH ever plays to the potential which his outstanding physical characteristics would allow. But, here’s the real story. He frequently plays in the front jumping spot for the Reds and wins good ball – not that difficult though; I saw the 180cms (max) Brussow win one there last weekend for the Cheetahs! From that he position, he drops off to the blindside wing, where he spends a lot of time. Making those tackles from this position does not qualify them as “covering tackles” and quite frankly Quade Cooper would have made them – although his probably would have been “covering”. Despite the fact that the Reds (successfully) played a lot of “pick and go/drive” type plays, we still did not see a lot of SH. When he does get close, he spends a lot of time standing off the edge – not withstanding his very successful “pick and score”. For one 5 minute period of the fourth quarter, I lost him on the tv screen. I thought that he must have been subbed off. Then he appeared again and at last – enter stage left.
    Actually, if I was Wallaby coach, I might indeed pick him, on the basis that I would back myself to change his game. “Hope still springs eternal in this human breast.”

  • http://www.bobdwyerrugby.com Bob Dwyer

    One thing I forgot. I agree entirely with other opinions of AWH. He was equally good last season. Don’t understand why he doesn’t get more game time.

    • BloodRed

      I have an excellent and knowledable source who has seen AWH’s scans. He doesn’t know how he manages to walk let alone play rugby so I suspect Link has that coach’s devil of injury management to contend with when allotting game time for him. Mores the pity that he spent 3 years getting those crap knees overseas.

Close