Dwyer’s View: Reds Not Up To The Challenge

Bob Dwyer July 22, 2012 23

No Gravatar

The Reds consistently looked to run around a drifting defence, more often than not with second line plays. As a general rule, I don’t like either of those strategies. Both of them tend to set your attacking lines cross-field and the second pushes the ball-carrier way too deep from the gain line. When the tackles were easily made, the subsequent pressure on the Reds from advancing Sharks defenders was impossible to withstand.

The accurate way to make space is: (i) to run straight, thus limiting the drift and making support easier; (ii) to use that support with urgency and no hesitation at and around the tackle, to continue the forward progress and attract more defence by way of off-load (like the Sharks – especially Coetzee) and immediate pick-and-go (like Samo, belatedly). Cross-field running and the dreaded prematurely repositioned pod system – which serves to eliminate pressure on opposition defences — are certainly not the way forward. How has our game degenerated into this shambles? (Incidentally, off-loads are not difficult. They require only accurate close support, opportunity and awareness. Then you just give the guy the ball!)

There are no easy ways to beat a committed, off-the-line defence, especially if they are all good tacklers – as the Sharks certainly are. It can be done, but, as is only fair, you have to work for it. Width is detrimental when there is no space. The Reds looked just for that width; they did not work to make space. Around the 50-minute mark, Genia received the ball from a set scrum – a first-phase play. He kicked across field for Shipperley, who caught it – with four Sharks players at hand and only Morahan to support.

One of my many attacking maxims is the closer the ball-carrier gets to the tackle line, the closer should the support player get to the ball-carrier. In other words, a support player on the outside should run an unders line as the tackle line looms. Basketball players understand this concept very well; unfortunately, not so many Australian rugby players – including the 2012 Reds squad. Cross-field running was the order of the day for them and attack coach Jim McKay would have been crying. Like I said, pressure can do that to you. One to remember – attackers should run at defenders, not away from them.

One charge we can never level at this Reds team, however, is that they gave up. Despite the crap hand that they were dealt, they fought valiantly – as they always have over the past months. They fought back from 3-20 to 10-20 and were within striking distance. Again, they came back from 10-30 with Samo’s try for a final 17-30 scoreline.

In the final analysis though, they were well beaten!

In the Crusaders’ crushing of the Bulls, it was more of the ‘I want my team to dominate the opposition’ idea – only the Crusaders did an even more complete job of it. Their forwards were brutal and clinical and made the job easy for Ellis, Carter, Dagg and their mates – as if they needed any assistance. If you want a lesson in straight running, close support, maintaining continuous pressure on defence and using the consequent space, take another look here. McCaw was phenomenal – I want whatever he eats for breakfast!

Prev2 of 2Next
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Discussion

  • DC.

    Nothing more to say than the Reds just didn’t rock up, and it was heart breaking as a diehard Reds fan after what they showed last weekend against the Tahs.

    I think the two biggest questions to come out of the game, were;

    a) They aren’t an excuse, but why did SANZAR put on two Durban born refs?

    b) Genia to 10? Really Ewen? Harris or even Taps to 10 (played 10 for TSS throughout school and Aust. Schoolboy) and the other to 12 was I think the right thought on everyones minds…

    Anyway, that’s rugby. Goodluck to the teams and their supporters left in the comp.

  • The Other Dave

    I think that sums it up. Yeah, I was pissed off at the ‘elephant in the room’; yet despite all the field position and possession in the second half, we pushed passes, ran sidewards, were generally predictable and subsequently got punished, and we used good quality pick and drive far too late.
    Makes me wonder if perhaps we should have used the penalties within the 22 to take the points. Oh well, praying to be pleasantly surprised in the tests now…

  • Cantab

    Had to google ‘superlative’.

  • Touko

    Yeah. Absolutely spot on Bob. My mental notes for the game said, ‘Due to injury and suspension the Reds have lost their great strength (an almost brilliant backline), so the forwards need to man up and at least equal the Sharks. Unfortunately the Reds forwards aren’t quite good enough, and unlike last year, they didn’t quite have the intensity to make up for it.

    The Sharks on the other hand were desperate and determined and played really well to boot.

    But good on the Reds for keeping on trying. Good on em for a terrific back half of the season. And good lck or next year.

    Oh, and find some forwards with psychological problems to fucken SCARE the opposition.

  • Super Ted

    High brow review Bob. Reds had their chances during the game and failed to capitalise, as you so correctly pointed out. A few bad calls didn’t make it easier, but the Reds weren’t just beaten; they were dominated by men possessed in Fortress Suncorp.

  • skip

    if the shorks end up facing the crusader’s in the final, the ref will either need a spare whistle or it will be some variant of a game, based loosely on the laws of rugby.

  • Red Kev

    I wondered about the “use of good quality pick and drive” or rather the lack of it too. It has been a hallmark of the Reds game for two seasons to swap back to that simple style executed at speed when things aren’t going their way, yet they didn’t do it on Saturday. I wonder if they missed James Horwill’s leadership in that instance.
    I was also curious to see AWH not called up to the Wallaby camp given he has outplayed every lock he’s been on the same field as this year. Yet Samo who couldn’t even crack the Reds team for much of the year gets a spot.

    • bill

      Samo gets on, Samo gets a try. He’s a physical freak.

  • johnny-boy

    Another observation was the class oozed by Tapaui as soon as he came on. Kicked for line, nice grubber kick. He emphasizes the fact that the Wallabies are not all picked on merit these days. He makes McCabe look like a rank amateur, coincidentally.

  • Robson

    Now that I’m more or less recovered from the pasting the Reds got at the hands of a merciless Sharks, I am getting nervous twitches about the upcoming Rugby Champs test series.

    Tapuai is a class act, and maybe the reason for his exclusion from the Wallabies train on squad may have something to do with the fact that no Red’s players were included in that squad due to the S15 matches. Same perhaps for Adam W-H; who is peaking well for the international season and, with the middle row crisis just now, is worth his weight in gold.

    • Red Kev

      Many Reds got added to the camp to meet on Aug 1-3. Genia, Higgers and Ioane were rested, Tapuai was called in, AWH was not.

      • Robson

        Another blind spot in the less and less encompassing vision of Robbie Deans.

      • The Other Dave

        …aaaaaand I’m not in the least bit surprised. Tapuai will carve it up next year, but is returning from long-term injury; AWH has a pearler of a year. Maybe there should be an Australia internets 1st XV.

      • Red Kev

        Ewen McKenzie’s column on RugbyHeaven today holds the answer to why AWH is not in the Wallaby mix.
        “…Beau Robinson and Adam Wallace-Harrison, who were unable to complete a full training week since early May due to chronic injuries.”

  • First time / Long time

    First things first, the sharks played very well and good luck to them.

    It must be said that it is a lot easier to defend with a meter or 2 head start and I will admit to being a biased Reds supporter but only the deluded can claim that the offside line was well policed.

    I was also disturbed at what I can only see as a tactic by Kaplan to disrupt Reds continuity.
    With penalty after penalty in the attacking 15m he not only refused to sin bin anyone but he constantly blew the whistle early when we were still hard on attack diffusing any advantage and making us start from scratch…. exactly what he did against the Highlanders which ruined that game for everyone, players and fans.

    And in that game he should have binned one of the Reds.
    When will SANZAR realise that he is a terrible referee.
    They claim best referee not neutral refs for the games but there were only 2 games played this weekend and he is not even close to the second best ref.
    I would go so far as to say is battling with my mate Bryce for least favourite.

    How is it that last season the Brumbies were able to piss and moan until Steve Walsh was substituted as ref for one of their games and the Reds have to cop the most ridiculous ref appointment. It was not fair to the Sharks who deserved their win without the taint of bias, it was not fair to the Reds and it was not fair to the Kaplan….. and from my point of view it was not fair to me because he is rubbish and ruined another game I was excited to watch.

    Apologies for the rant….. see you next year.

    • bill

      I always end up yelling at the ref in reds games, and i don’t mind Kaplan, but I agree about the offside line. I think the sharks are a much better team than the highlanders as far as fair play goes. The highlanders were cynical where the sharks just played as the ref allowed. And did nothing I wouldn’t want the reds to do.

      60 minutes, 70 minutes mark, should/ve been a yellow for infringements in the reds scoring zone … on the other hand there were a couple of non decisions at scrum with the reds prop binding on the arm and a few poor handling touches.

      So all in all the Reds could still have taken the game over from the ref, they didn’t. It’s onward and upward next year, and recognise the effort this year, that was pretty decent.

      …thought Genia was a lot better at 5/8 this game, If Quade wasn’t there he’d be the Qld 10 by a mile. Still I thought Morahan should have gone for Taps, with Harris moving to 15, fair enough you have to score trys, but you have to give yourself the best chance of winning as well and Harris’s best possie is probably FB.

  • First time / Long time

    Back again… on your comment about the kick for Shipperly Bob, it was actually a great option, he was unmarked and if executed properly it was a certain try, which if Harris or prob Tapuai were at 10 would have been.

    The issue for me, and you touched on it, was Genia moving to flyhalf and you have to wonder about the coaching staffs understanding of the different pressures on different decisions between the 2 positions.

    Genia is a world class 9 arguably the best but a bog average 10 at that level. I am not having a go at him, he tried his heart out all game but that decision to move him meant we lost our half back and 5/8th to one injury and that is hard to cover.

  • http://BigFella Big Fella

    The physical strength, precision and aggression of the Crusaders and Sharks packs rings alarm bells for the upcoming Test series.
    The SA teams are no longer unfit or playing dumb.
    There is discipline to stick with their game plan and they aren’t giving away cheap penalties any more either.
    The NZ teams always seem to have lots of bodies in motion when attacking, so they aren’t as slow or predictable as the Aust teams.
    The other lesson the SA and NZ teams have learnt is that if you stop Genia, you stop our attack.
    These challenges will test Deans coaching ability to the max.

    • Robson

      I think his coaching ability has already been tested to the max. Any further testing could be embarrassing.

      • johnny-boy

        It’s hard to feel optimistic that he’s suddenly going to turn in to a great selector, player manager or tactician. We live in forlorn hope that a miracle might happen.

  • muffy

    Mate. This is not a political thread, and your steriotyping of an entire nation based on colour, white = bad and black = good is frankly childish and uncalled for. SA has always played an abrasive style of rugby, relying on force more than finesse we Aussies could probably raise our game on that front. This does not make them lesssporting than others in fact I think you will find some of the Saffas who are quite popular with the players, yet lunatics on the field. Get off you high horse and stop embarrassing the rest of us.

    FYI pietersen has been a grub from day one.

    • muffy

      GAGR. Please may you remove this comment from me above, as it refers to another post that has been deleted and makes me look more nuts than usual talking to no one… again

  • Jimbo81

    Finally AWH getting long overdue recognition!

Close