Dwyer’s View: Wallabies Seal a Valuable Series Win

Bob Dwyer June 18, 2012 43

No GravatarI saw the game live at Etihad Stadium and I had lousy seats – side-on and low down. I’m now travelling in Tasmania and I’ve been unable to watch any replays, so I’ve some difficulties in writing an accurate assessment of the match. (Let’s not play the obvious game here!)

I’m going to give my summary impressions now and, if anyone’s interested, I’ll add more later in the week, but probably not until Friday.

Here goes!

This was a valuable series win for the Wallabies. They are playing the Six Nations grand slam champions, who had also won many fans with the quality and style of their play at the World Cup. The Wallabies were without their three backline stars – Beale, O’Connor and Cooper – plus Mitchell and Turner. A few injuries up front — Horwill, Elsom, Vickerman, Timani — added to the selectors’ woes. On top of this, there have not been many displays during the Super Rugby season that have given us grounds for optimism. So, all in all, the coaches can take a bow, I reckon — and it’s a while since I’ve said that.

I thought that we played better again, following our first Test win. We all thought that Wales would improve over their shoddy first game – and they did! We needed to get a late, flip-the-coin penalty, as the ref was handing them out, to get the result, but, overall, I thought that we deserved it. We were always more likely to score tries, I thought. Our play was more constructive — and it’s a while since I’ve said that also.

My specific impressions were:

Genia hatching the egg

  • Our forwards were industrious and accurate and provided enough, quick ball from the tackle. Higginbotham was much more involved, but still goes missing when the hard yards are needed. Kepu is showing more signs of his ball-carrying ability and made some great, difficult tackles. Robinson was more involved also, but could still carry more in the closer channels. Still more required, if we are to challenge NZ, and even SA.
  • Our slow ball, however – and there will always be some slow ball — is frequently , ponderously slow. This makes the job of the forwards – to regenerate front-foot ball – too difficult. We have to be better in this area.
  • We must now move forward to provide alternative tackle-contest options, other than the ruck. More urgent, accurate tight support will provide opportunity for the latch-and-drive (like Hooper with the Brumbies), off-loads (like NZ), pop-ball and immediate pick-and-drive. These will be match-winning moments for the likes of TPN, Kepu, Palu and Higgers. They will all need to be running tight lines with real desire to contribute.
  • Our set plays were good, but we cannot persist with Alexander at loosehead off the bench. We nearly lost the match because of his inability to bind and stay upright. Surely Slipper would be better in the scrum and more industrious in the tight-loose.
  • Barnes played his best Test. He attacked the advantage line, ran straightish, got a couple of second touches, broke the line four or five times, made his usual high number of tackles. His kicking out of hand was a little inconsistent, but, for the posts, he was excellent. A well-deserved player of the match.
  • Genia profited from the good work in front of him and was again dominant. Like all great players, he has lots of time. I can’t remember any of his passes missing the target either. Not before time!
  • Passing and running lines in the backs were generally pretty good. Accurate passing, in front of the receiver, was much more consistent. Our attack was therefore generally more threatening than that of the Welsh. One error from Ioane cost us dearly – on a switch-pass, the ball-carrier changes his angle, not the receiver. A lack of urgency in cover didn’t help either.
  • AAC and Ioane were both great – one a picture of solidity plus skill, the other a constant threat anywhere on the pitch.
  • Both centres were OK – excellent in defence and continuing to show more in attack, little by little.
  • Our defence was very good. We offered Wales virtually nothing and this has been a very good attacking unit, albeit now without Roberts. We had urgency and initiative, with a number of great reads to get off the line to snuff out potentially dangerous attacks, way behind the advantage line. One scramble back, with Kepu especially prominent, was top class.
  • Vuna’s brain snap could well have cost us the match. This was inexcusable and I’m guessing that we won’t see him next week. I hope this will be a memorable lesson for him – he has some rare qualities.
  • I suggested that I would take a good look at Simmons and I’ll do that later, but I thought that both the locks, especially Sharpe with his effective carries, contributed well.

We’re making progress and, if we keep going, we’ll eventually reach our destination. We have the potential, with all hands on deck, to be very good.

More later!

Discussion »

  • TahMan

    Thanks for the review Bob.

    I still think Simmons is a bit too soft. He is like those people that you work with that get into the office at 8am and leave at 630pm. Do sweet f all up until 620pm and then say they are really busy….

    Vuna has been let off and is available to play. What happens now? Do you persist with him, or totally shit on his confidence and drop him? Its a tough one.

    Changes I would make for next week.

    Fingers for Horne (although Horne has been solid, Fingers off the bench has been great)
    AAC for Vuna
    Beale/Morahan to start at FB
    Palmer for Alexander
    Pyle for Simmons

    • RJ

      Good choices. I reckon shiperley for vuna, aac to OC for Horne with Beale at FB. Love the Pyle/Palmer selections.

      • Chris

        Deans is not a dill and provided all are fit he will pick:
        15 Beale
        14 AAC
        13 Horne
        12 McCabe
        11 Ioane
        10 Barnes
        9 Genia
        Use Beale’s return to ease Vuna out – he must know he’s blown it. Horne offers a lot more in attack than Ant, even though his form this year has not been his best. Beale at fullback adds the x-factor. He isn’t needed at 10, so don’t put him there.
        I saw Morahan against Scotland and he was very nervous so I’m not heavily in favour. Shipperley or Honey Badger for Vuna if Beale doesn’t return.
        Guys, Slipper is only marginally better than Alexander in the scrum. Palmer looks a good solid unit at 3. If he replaces Tonka Kepu can switch to 1. We must have our best scrummaging props. At the moment, these three are it, with daylight next.
        Not sure whether Deans will persevere with Hooper/Dennis on the bench or give one of the up-and-coming locks a run. Tough choice.
        All in all though, we should admit the Wallabies have done well given the form of the provinces going in!

  • Joe Mac

    Bob,

    Firstly thank you for continuing to write articles here, very enjoyable.

    What are your thoughts on the Wallabies not currently carrying a specialist Lock on the bench?

    • Trys NOT Kicks

      I’m not sure what Bob thinks but I think it is a pretty grave error. After all lock is a specialist position and the lack of one in set plays is not desired-think of our scrum in the first match when Dennis was brought on-not that he is bad player but he certainly is not a specialist lock.

  • Colin

    No Horwill, No Vickerman…No Cooper/Lealilifano, O’Connor, Tapaui, Mitchell, Turner, Beale…that is pretty much a whole new backline right there (2 10′s, no 9.)

    Vuna showed again why he hardly even rated a super rugby player, Horne had an average game but shouldn’t be there in the first place.

    I would love to see McCabe get the chance at fullback, i know Beale is coming back but McCabe played his best rugby at 15 in 2011, then Deans thought he was better at 12 because he played the last 2 games of the 2011 super rugby season there?
    I call BS.

    Genia should hopefully get a break next game aswell, as then White can get a chance to show his international capabilities

    • fr3ak

      McCabe is great at 12 BUT he is getting some serious problems with his shoulders, every match so far he went down at least twice in absolute pain from tackling and charging in so directly. He was a great 15 so I totally agree with him moving back, particularly as I think he has the ability to be around for awhile in the green and gold.

      • Gumby

        McCabe at 15 when Beale is available? Why on earth would you do that? He is a good player and doing well but Beale is world class.

  • Colin

    Would love to see Dennis get another start, Palu off the bench for impact with 25 to go…

    Hugh Pyle for Simmons, Rob is a bloody penalty magnet and goes missing when the hard hitting needs to be done.

    Morahan for Vuna….AAC for Horne…Beale to FB, Keep White, Faingaa and Harris on the bench

    • Bobby

      Colin you need to watch the game. I think he is the best in the Australian team at EFFECTIVE clear outs. He is also a very sneaky in creating holes for his back three.

  • murph

    Well, there you go. I actually agree that Higginbotham needs to pick up his game. He was noticeably uninvolved and his stats reflect that.

    • robbo

      Well Murph, that’s because his secondary role appears to be covering the left wing when Ioane is at the bottom of the ruck – either that or he just likes talking to the crowd!

  • http://BigFella Big Fella

    Bob,
    There seems to be a lot of energy around the Wallabies picking certain players and combinations to play against different opposition.
    Do you agree with this or should you pick your best players in each position and adapt?
    If you did pick different players/combo’s, what would be your Lock pairing against the AB’s and SA?
    Oh, and don’t forget to bring your mates back a T-shirt from Tassie.

  • The Rant

    Well I can think of at least one Genia pass that didnt find it’s mark – gifted wales their 2nd try. God it was annoying lisetning to british commentators going on about how the welsh had finally busted open australia when it was just a shitty pass to noone that they just kicked ahead.

    Agree with your comment that Aus always looked more likely to score. 2nd half, while enthralling was also fridtrating as everytime we got up their end they committed a foul – stopping all momentum.

    We did have a lot of slow ball, but i thought we were good at turning it into quick ball.

    Deans really has to rethink this bench re the scrum – we’re playing the final 10/15mintues with Dennis at 2nd row with sharpe and alexander up front ?

    • Mick

      Yeah, I immediately thought the same thing too. The pass was from Genia, although I’m not sure it was all his fault, as I think Ioane miss-timed it too – but Genia should’ve realised and just taken the hit up, instead of passing to no one.

      • The Other Dave

        Tobe fair, Bob did cover that, and it looked to me that Ioane was in the wrong place during a switch. Not so sure that Genia could have done much after Ioane changed lines, it was s plit second thing and if Genia had held the pill for a second longer, we’d be further lamenting him having to look up before a pass or taking the wind-up. Sometimes the scrumhalf can’t win.

  • D.

    Spot on Bob. I agree 100% with what you’ve written.

    Who would be in your 22 Man squad for game 3?

  • Robson

    It’s a funny thing but when the All Blacks beat the Irish by a dropped goal they were pleased enough, but the next day they were instantly into the ritual navel gazing they do when they don’t win by at least thirty points. The Wallabies won
    by a single point and were deservedly elated and they showed it.

    But the biggest difference is that in terms of recent test credentials the Wallabies beat the Six Nations champions. The All Blacks beat an Irish side that, given their performance a week ago, they should have beaten comfortably. No disrespect to the Irish, they produced a memorable test match performance and with a stroke of luck might have carried the day.

    But the All Blacks, even though they spoke with gusto and at length about raising the bar from the 1st test, were a shade too cocky.

    Next week’s test matches are going to be intensely interesting; at least in the lead up to them. Final proof of the pudding, of course is in the eating.

    • Patrick

      Oh no I absolutely agree that we really need to focus on our re-alignment, which is nearly there, but only because of our speed to recycle, which is way too slow too often, and Bob Dwyer’s second and third dot-points could not be more right.

      We also need to work a fair bit more on our scrum, but that’s obvious!!

      Finally, I’m surprised Bob hasn’t mentioned it, but we really need to force our centres to distribute the ball more often, they do a great job at what they do but they are not nearly as dangerous as any of the runners outside them (including Vuna!) and their first instinct must be to pass! No wonder Cooper threw such long passes ;)

    • Muzza

      Maybe the navel gazing is what makes the Ab’s #1, and the Wallabies only #2. Both close games, and hardly worthy of joyous celebrations from either side.

      • Robson

        I suspect that the navel gazing emanates from the fear of becoming #2, which admittedly might well be one way of staying #1. But nothing lasts forever and when it does vapourise no player wants to be part of a team that is on that slide; however temporary it might (or might not) be.

        • Serious?

          Couldn’t agree more with Muzza. This navel gazing is the very reason New Zealand is #1 in the world, and likely the reason why NZ produces wave after wave of motivated and driven talent (at least on the rugby field). The thought of not being the worlds best is too frightening to consider……

  • johnny-boy

    There appears to be a theme eminating from both Australia and Wales, which is to
    a play no risk, wait for the opposition to make a mistake, strangulation type game, then
    try and take advantage of a stressed opponent on the counter attack. And I wonder
    where they get that from ?. I thought you’d never ask. Their boring bloody kiwi coaches.
    This style does indeed suit the bitter, chip balancing dark nz personality because they
    are ruthless in their execution and have learnt well the art of ball in hand from Australia.
    But it doesn’t suit Australians and it doesn’t, appear to suit the welsh. It’s screaming out to me that the welsh have been effectively stripped of their berrys. They just don’t appear to have any ‘boyo’ left in them anymore and I’m betting it’s because they handed over the keys to the heart of welsh rugby so many years ago, to boring bloody strangulation kiwi coaches.
    First it was Henry, then it was Hansen and now it is the dimwitted Gatland. So what does welsh
    rugby stand for anymore ?. Absolutely nothing it appears. Just a bunch of ‘professionals’
    going thru the motions terrified of making of mistake lest they upset their bitter kiwi master.
    They are serving up a stone cold welsh rarebit version of the game. They need to go home and relearn their passionate national style. To give their supporters something to really sing about.
    Not po kare kare bloody anna mywfllgh.

    • Antony

      I literally couldn’t disagree more. Gatland and Wales just won a grand-slam playing great rugby. They’re perfectly fine with their “boring” “bitter, chip balancing” “dimwitted” kiwi coach, they’re just getting beaten away from home by a better team.

      I’ve found both games so far really entertaining.

  • mark conley

    There must be a better 6 than Higginbotham, is anything but a ‘destructive’ runner, has loose hands, ‘goes missing’, who else is there?

  • ChumbaWumba

    Except Johnny-boy they beat every other team in Europe and might have beaten us on 2 occasions.

    • johnny-boy

      “They beat every other team in Europe”. So what ? Whoopy de do. NH teams are being beat by an experimental SA team just finding it’s feet after 4 years bumbling by PD clown, beaten by the All Blacks just muckin around and a semi strength wallaby team with the dumbest coach in world rugby (now that pd clown has gone).

  • murph

    They did well in defence but Horne or McCabe actually pass the ball in the entire game?

    Horne also ran into Digby’s space in attack…again…and again.

  • JimmyC

    No Higgers fanboys beating his drum.

  • FORCE FAN

    Comments from the game:

    1. Higgers doesn’t do enough of the hard stuff to be our No 6.

    2. Palu must be carrying some sort on injury as looked very proppy. Also has no confidence in taking the high ball at re-starts – looked totally lost when the Welsh picked him out in the 2nd half.

    3.Can’t understand why NZ refs almost totally ignore off side.

    4. Welsh tactic of tackling with hard shoulder hits into quads a bit too obviously trying to disable. Would love to know what the Wallaby cork count was after the game.

    5. Hope Hooper gets another run to show what he can do at this level. Poor contribution inc 2 knock-ons during his 13 mins almost cost us the game.

    6. Vuna shows lots of endeavour but little impact at this level. We didn’t need his stupid 10 minutes in the bin for a basic error.

    7. We are going to miss Sharpie when he stops playing Test rugby!!!

  • commonasmud

    Another great read Bob, your thoughts are much appreciated.

    Agree re Simmons, but I disagree re Sharpie. I don’t deny Sharpie’s level of involvement (he’s been a great warrior), but while his “run and flop” routine might rack up the stats it isn’t particularly effective. In fact, I think it’s reflective of some of the less effective aspects of Australia’ forward play which you remarked upon. Making Genia stand there with the ball ready while the forwards ready themselves midfield for another “run and flop” is frustrating to watch and seems a pointless exercise in losing momentum. The Aussies very effectively used the rolling maul late in the match, and I’m wondering if that’s what you are thinking they should be using some more?

    • bill

      I’ve been critical of Sharpie’s run and flop routine in the past as you’ve so succinctly put it, so I have to say it’s not what he’s doing at the moment. It’s stood out like dog’s balls to me that he’s actually fighting to keep his feet that crucial second or two longer, the result being he gives his support time to secure the possession. I no longer go ‘Oh no’ when I see him get the ball on a lone hit up.

      Regarding urgency around that kick through try to the welsh, I guess it wasn’t Rob Simmons I saw busting a gut to get back and just about matching the welsh back for pace, it was obviously a visual artefact caused by my red tinted glasses. Gee I guess that admiration for effort was misplaced.

  • jimmy

    Thanks Bob,

    I remain unconvinced that Deans is the right man for the job. There are a number of reasons for this but essentially;
    1. He has had 5 year to build a team and we still don’t seem to have a set and solid line up that performs consistently.
    2. The Wallabies have never rediscovered the “smart” Rugby they used to play. In fact I think we get more stupid every year. We also seem to lack a “plan b” when the opposition puts pressure on.
    3. The scrum still has periods where it doesn’t stand up.
    4. Our attack has lost it’s way – we struggle to score tries and our basic skills are lacking.
    5. We were always the best defensive team in the world – not since Deans took over.
    6. His use of the bench has, to date, been baffling.
    7. He continued, mainly before this year, to use players that failed to perform.
    8. Our form at the WC was atrocious and so was his team selection and tactics.

    Anyway, just my opinion. Would love to hear the thoughts of others.

    • robbo

      I think your No 2 is the crux of the whole issue for the last five years. We have no one with the smarts of an Eales (and most of his team) or a Gregan ot Larkham who can think under pressure. The downturn in the team IQ started with Flately and has continued downhill. Can anyone remember the last time we had a halfback who actually changed his restart kick when it had just failed for the umpteenth time! Or even a captain who told him to change it!

    • Gumby

      Jimmy;

      1. Deans has rebuilt the Wallabies and now they are ranked 2 second only to the AB’s. They were the laughing stock of world rugby when he took over. They continue to improve and it took more than 5 years from 1993 to become the top team again in 1999. We haven’t been the top team since 2002/2002 and for most of that period since 2001/2002 we weren’t even 2nd.

      2. As above the last time the Wallabies “smart rugby” gave them the results we want for them was the fabled Lions Tour. During the Eddie Jones/John Connelly eras they played “robotically” most of the time and regularly failed against the many better teams going around. They were predictable automatons mostly being regularly beaten by NZ, SA, England, France and even Wales on a couple of occasions.

      3.The Wallaby scrum has historically been suspect and inconsistent. Even the 99RWC winning team had a scrum that was seen as their weakness. At least we have several props to choose from now. That is several more than we’ve usually had historically.

      4. Last year we scored many scintillating tries and were arguably the most dangerous attacking team in world Rugby. The fact that we have been without Beale, O’Conner and Cooper might have something to do with the fact that we haven’t been scoring those type of tries in our first three games this year. It might also be that we played Scotland in a hurricane and you could have thrown a blanket over both teams for most of the game and then we have been playing arguably the fourth best team in the world as well since who do have an excellent defence.

      5. The last time we were the best defensive team in the world was probably in the Eales era. If we were always the best defensive team before Deans came along, when Jones and Connelly were coaching, why did we lose so many games? Why was the 2007 RWC campaign such a disgrace. Defence wins matches. It is a furry to say we always had the best defence. Not only is that not right but we didn’t have the best attack during their tenure either.

      6. Whilst many would challenge his use of the bench we now have players who can play 80+ minutes. Over the last two years we have started winning the tight ones. Maybe his tactics are starting to speak for themselves with results.

      7. Your opinion only and with the injuries to many first choice players perhaps his selections have been forced on him. Anyway his second string team with all those non performing players you mention have just deservedly beaten the best Northern Hemisphere Team twice on the trot in only their third game together this year.

      8. We didn’t have the best world cup; granted. But that shocking defence you referred to beat the Springboks with just 30% possession in probably what was the best defensive effort of the last decade or even longer.

      Just felt the need to balance the books and stop the rose coloured re-writing of history.

  • chasmac

    Given that the Welsh defense was very quick to move up and was very borderline offside for the entire 80 minutes, I thought our centres did very well.
    They had no time or space but still managed to keep their heads and not start making mistakes.
    And McCabe is a hard bastard. The run he did where Warburton ended up in Disneyland was fearless and just bloody hard.
    The Welsh defense certainly applied alot of pressure and on the whole I thought that our offense maintained parity and even bested them enough to get the nod. Or as Bob said, look more likely to score.

  • TahMan

    With Horwill most likely out for the rest of the season, ARU have now expressed they would like Sharpe to stay on until the end of TRC.

    While this is fine for Sharpe has he seems to be in ok form, what then? His retirement is just around the corner and we have yet to see a player get any quality game time to get ready. What happens if Sharpe gets injured? Throw Pyle or Timani in against the All Blacks?

    One would assume that there would be some changes for this weekend as we have won the series, but you know what they say about assumptions…

    • johnny-boy

      Not to worry TahMan – Deans has got it covered with Dennis the new part time lock. There’s no need for specialist locks in a Robbie Deans coached team, or seven, or inside centre, or tighthead or loosehead props …..

  • No Bryce = Good Rugby

    I was a bit disappointed in Genia’s service from scrum and ruck. I’m worried he’s starting to develop the old Gregan “two steps sideways then pass” garbage.

    But he’s still light years ahead of any alternative we have – time to get Nick Two-Dads down to training to straighten Sanchez’s alignment.

  • Nabley

    With all that possession they had and had not about to score with, I wonder why people keep saying we were always more likely to score tries when we didn’t.

    Good teams find ways of winning, but in this case I thought Wales found a way to lose. From the moment their flyhalf kicked that ball, my water told me it was going to happen. I agree with Bob, the ref could not help himself. I would like to hav eseen who actually did pull that maul down, because I did see a Wallaby loose his feet. Regardless, there was a good chance Pocock would have got a try if the penalty had not been given.

  • http://www.bobdwyerrugby.com Bob Dwyer

    Well I finally got to look at a replay and can respond to a few questions, especially re Rob Simmons.
    I had thought that he had lifted his effectiveness in both ball-carries and clear-outs, but now I’m not so sure. He was fine for the first quarter, but seemed to tire very quickly. He became very one paced and lost any explosive impact. This lack of explosive power will limit his ability to be a major contributor. Even when his team are under pressure – say, following a line-break – he still cannot/does not lift his pace or urgency. This is not good enough. Compare him, say, with Sharpe, Whitelock or Etzebeth and you’ll see a significant difference.
    Kepu is starting to show some of his huge potential. McCabe and Horne made significant contributions – I saw much more from them on TV.

  • bill

    Actually thought Simmons had a fine game. Good idea to give Timani some time with Sharpe as his partner for this game though.

  • bill

    Although I’m hesitant to say that Sharpie is ‘grooming’ Timani as that would just be disturbing.

Close