Instant Review: Reds v. Stormers – Storm Damage

Steve Timms April 20, 2012 30

No GravatarLess than a minute in and the first penalty was awarded to the Stormers, about 8 metres from the sideline 30 metres out. The Stormers duly kicked it and it was 3-0 to the Stormers.

Then the curse struck again, putting on a step, Reds flyhalf Sam Lane looked to have done a knee.

The Stormers reputation for all defence no attack was put to rest with a try to Gio Aplon. The try came from a super bit of counter attack. From a breakdown they kicked and some offensive defence from Juan De Jongh on Ben Tapuai, forcing the turn over, seizing on the momentum, Aplon strolled over for the try.

The tackle caused more injury issues for the Reds as during the conversion Tapuai left the field, reports later came up that it was a fractured collar bone. The Reds were now out of back reserves. The conversion was successful and the score 10-0 to the Stormers.

The ebb and flow of the match settled and both teams played the territory game. the Reds had the only two point scoring opportunities in the half, Mike Harris kicked one that was just short, and it wasn’t until the 29th minute that the Reds earned a penalty and Ben Lucas converted. The Reds were on the board.

In the 37th minute, with the Stormers hard on attack, several phases were repelled by the Reds before Radike Samo (and he was far from Robinson Crusoe) made a telling miss in defence, the opportunity was taken with Peter Grant sneaking over the line to get the ball down. He converted his own try to give the Stormers a 17-3 lead.

As the half time hooter sounded, it was clear the break was needed. The 17 – 3 deficit was clearly getting to the Reds who were in panic mode, with plenty of kicks that weren’t on and attempts at miracle plays being tried. Would half time change the momentum?

The first six minutes of the second half were all Red, only very committed defence from the Stormers holding them out. This all culminated in Rob Simmons getting over the line, but he was unable to control the ball and it was deemed an knock on.

In the fifty-third minute, some lazy work off the ball resulted in Scott Higginbotham being hit by the ball and the Stormers were awarded a penalty for accidental offside. It was in a very kick-able location, and the Stormers wasted no time in adding the extra points to have the score 20-3 in their favour.

The best looking attacking chance for the Reds came when the Stormers took the ball into the 22, and kicked in out on the full, the kick was done from 5 metres out which gave the Reds a cracking attacking (rhyming) line out. They secured clean ball and went to set a maul, but the Stormers defence was up to it, the counter rucking was intense and the ball was turned over.

The Reds were playing all the footy though, and it eventually paid, in the sixty-first minute Captain James Horwil crossed for a try, swooping on a loose ball at the back of the line-out. Mike Harris converted to make the score 20-10 to the Stormers. Had the comeback begun?

Still the Reds pushed, but a combination of their lack of penetration and the starch of the Stormers defence meant they were repelled with alarming regularity. The Reds managed to turn the Stormers scrum and win the re-feed in the seventy eighth minute, and then earn a penalty from the reset. Mike Harris kicked the penalty to make the score 20 -13, but the clock was going to mean the come back would fall short.

A penalty shortly after the re-start gave Peter Grant an easy shot at goal, and the opportunity to wind down the clock. He made the shot count and the deficit was back to 10 (23-13) with the hooter only a minute away. That would deny the Reds a much needed bonus point, how much would that cost them at seasons end.

From the restart the Stormers secured possession, holding it at the back of the ruck until the hooter sounded and they put the ball out, putting an end to the Reds misery.

Honestly the injury’s don’t help, especially all in one position, but there is plenty of headless play going on. Against a team like the Stormers, they needed accuracy and cool heads but the panic seemed to set in early. The second half was much more composed, but they are paying dearly for a lack of creativity in attack.

The effort is there, but it just isn’t coming off, partly due to poor execution and partly due to poor decisions under pressure. The clinical Reds of 2011 are nowhere to be seen. Clearly, there is also the danger of running out of backs.

It clearly now the question changes from HOW can the Reds get this season back on track to CAN the Reds get this season back on track?

Reds 13 (Try: Horwill Con: Harris 1/1 Pen: Lucas 1/2, Harris 1/2) defeated by Stormers 23 (Try: Aplon, Grant Con: Grant 2/2 Pen: 4/4)

Man of the Match went to Peter Grant from the Stormers

Crowd: 31,548

Discussion »

  • Alan

    Taps’s injury, last years heroes playing way below their high standards and aussie sides still failing to recoup possession at kick offs

    depressing

  • Brax

    Nup, they’re gone! Tapuai has been their best back & now he’s likely gone for the duration. Ten is the poison chalice it has been for years apart from the last two. 5 flyhalves down in a season…. is this some kind of record? Sure two came back this week but they were severely underdone….. Why did Lucas take over from Harris for kicking duties for two kicks? I think I counted around 8 fucking chip kicks & only one was, maybe,ever on & umpteen useless up & unders that just gifted the Stormers field position. Up to great heights for a season & a bit & back down to the dross we’ve all come to expect.
    Credit to Stormers defense though. It was immense.That turnover from the 5 metre lineout as described in the write up was pure forward magic! Awesome intensity.

  • http://www.doubletakeproductions.com.au/sports/ armatt

    So much of the Reds’ effort was simply sloppy and inaccurate.

    Forwards were not cleaning out past the ball, and lacked urgency – so often they waited for the work to come to them, or worse, for it to be done by somebody else.

    Backs were overrunning the ball. Rocket was the most obvious example, but was not the sole culprit. The backs’ support play too went missing for long, long periods and only seemed to reemerge once a break had been made. Then, usually, the player was well supported and not isolated, but until such time as the Stormers made a defensive lapse (rare in and of itself) or an individual made a break or half-break off their own back, those around the ball carrier seemed disinterested in offering any real options and in so doing left some of the Stormers checking their watches, bored of the predictability of what was in front of them.

    Granted, to lose your starting 10 and 13 within seven minutes of kickoff will destabilise, but to be frank, combinations didn’t seem to be much of an issue, and Benny Lucas is no slouch at 10. It was enthusiasm, accuracy and patience that were lacking.

  • Chris

    Very poor decision making by Genia. Chip and chase in your own 22??? Give frisby a crack. Good to see Morahan backing himself. Very frustrating to see 60m of hard work get undone with 1phase of sloppy defense. I also can’t see much value being added by Samo…

    Horwill..penalty at 10 down…..interesting..

    • Cantab

      I guess they were happy to settle for a bonus point.

      • http://www.timmsonline.com Steve Timms

        Yeah, that’s what I think too.

        Bit of a sad sign of the mindset, You can’t really see the 2011 Reds going for a losing bonus point.

        Logically, time was getting away, but it is the vibe of the place atm.

        • johnny-boy

          Spot on Steve. They should have gone for broke

    • mw

      Chipping in their own 22 worked last year but without QC none of that stuff works this year

    • bill

      I thought it was harris with the chip in the last 5?

    • Goldie

      I thought Horwill had been subbed by then?

  • Cantab

    Reds really need a rebels win this weekend.

  • royboi

    without quade, everyone just seemed lost on the field

  • Robson

    I’m not sure that Quade would have added enough to have ensured a better performance from the Reds. The ditch they are currently in is much deeper than the efforts of one man can dig them out of I feel. In any event Quade needs a foil to run off him and capitalise on his efforts like Diggers and Taps, he can’t play the game on his own.

    However, the Reds forwards are just a rabble at the moment. They are standing around the breakdown like non paying spectators. Never, ever going to win against anyone – much less the Stormers – playing like that.

  • wallaby fan

    The reds are simply being found out. They do not have a pack that instills fear in anyone and their luck, as it always was going to, has run out. Last year their backs (and one or two forwards) won them a championship with flick passing fairy floss rugby, when we all know it is usually the team with the most dominant pack that wins. (Usually the Crusaders). I think this year the rugby gods are restoring order to the rugby world and the reds are destined to mid to low table where they belong. That is until they get back to lusting for the breakdown as all good teams should. Higginbotham for example epitomises all that is wrong with reds rugby. A fairy floss player that has played on the wing to pick up the odd try and chipped kicked his way into stardom when he should be concentrating on more of the mundane that doesn’t get noticed but that actually contributes to quality ball for his backs. He should get some video footage of Dusatoir, Ferris, Elsom (of 2009), and Lydiate and see how real men play at no 6. Reds fans should be demanding more from their forwards like Higginbotham and stop bitching about which back has which injury. It matters little if your forwards can’t produce the goods.

    • murph

      Oh, honestly, just fuck off will you? The Reds pack bashed the Stormers in Cape Town this time last year. Piss off you Waratards sook

      • wallaby fan

        struck a cord then? the red pack bashed no-one last year. theyre too soft and you know it.

        • bill

          Yup, you guys have dean mumm, glass houses much?(actually think mumm comes in foor na bit of unfair stick myself, but hey if we’re in the spirit of shortchanging players I’ll join in just to be fashionable) Of course that would kind of being in agreement with you which isn’t a position I’d take.

          The reds pack are soft are they? so that half hour last year camped on our tryline spent unable to move the requisite 5m forward by your lot is just a horrible dream that may be proof positive of the membrane theory of universes…jeez how did that go again.

        • commonasmud

          Firstly, I’ll say that calling the Reds pack soft this year is a fair cop – WTF has happened to the obvious hunger from last year? They prob didn’t bash anyone last year, but did any Aussie pack bash anyone?

          Now to address the rest of your jibber-jabber:

          From the perspective of someone who was there on Friday, Higgers had a mighty game, particuarly all the little one-percenters that don’t make the highlights – he was hungry for work, cleaned out hard, and his leadership was notable, geeing his teammates up and at one point giving some them a massive spray for not getting off the turf and back into the defensive line.

          If Higgers epitomises all that is wrong with Reds rugby I’ll take that. Let’s see who epitomises the Tahs – they just need to exhibit characteristics of: boring; poor skills; boring; no ticker; complete failure to deliver on promise; did I forget utterly boring. There’s a loooong shortlist of players putting their hands up there.

        • murph

          Yeah righto Wannabe Fan. You obviously didn’t watch too many games then. The Reds bashed the Stormers and beat the Cru twice.

          You struck a chord alright. It’s the same boring chord that every provincial parochialist dick has struck since the start of this season.

          Take your Johnny Come Lately comments, roll them up and shove them up your well worn arsehole.

      • wallaby fan

        Last year reds backs made up for reds forwards inadequacies by a combination of calculated good play (mainly Genia) and risky fairly floss play (mainly Cooper) that paid off. By the way the Crusaders smashed the reds up front in the final and did everything to win that game having travelled around the world that week mind you and if it were not for Genia’s try against the run of play…….anyways well done on last year and all credit to the reds backline but your forwards were and still are a joke. My point stands you’re luck simply has run out. I know that is frustrating and confusing which has led to your angry rants, I’m just trying to help you to understand why the reds are shite all of a sudden. Fairy Floss rugby gets found out in the long run.

        • bill

          bullshit wf.

    • Sohail

      What are you talking about? Higginbotham is one of three loose forwards, it is his role of the trio to stay out wide. If you want to criticize the Reds being too soft up front, blame the tight five. That is their primary job. Robinson, Gill, Schatz – basically whoever plays the other two loosie positions – play tight around the fringes already which frees up Higginbotham to roam in the backline to add extra thrust to a backline which already lacks penetration, and to add some defensive starch to a relatively lightweight backline. Maybe if they did their job when they are given clean ball, he wouldn’t be out there being a ‘fairy’ as you put it. I don’t get why people target him so much, he has done nothing wrong. He’s consistently played hard this season. He’s been one of their few players who stood out and made any impact this season. He has x-factor, he’s the only guy I’ve seen getting over the gain line, he does the hard work when it’s required of him and he’s one of the, if not, main reason the Reds are functioning well in the lineout. It’s just annoying to see this guy get singled out all the time and not given the credit he’s deserved all season.

      • the realist

        ‘higginbotham to roam in the backline’….. thats why the reds are rubbish. You are playing with 7 forwards when you can’t afford to. Watching Lydiate from Wales play the way a no 6 should and then watching Higgers for the reds it’s amazing the difference a good no 6 makes. He’s got to man up and he’s not the only one from the reds!

      • wallaby fan

        what are you talking about? the tight five refers to the tight five in the scrum. it’s up to the loosies to get to the breakdowns in the loose and Higginbotham can’t do that when he’s bludging on the wing.

  • Dougs

    Stormers too good. The Reds have injuries sure, but the main thing missing from last year is commitment. Last year they played like the Brumbies are this year, passionate and aggro etc. I still hold out hope they will make the finals, but to be honest the run home looks tougher than the first half of the season.

  • bill

    Well, I thought it was a positive sign for the reds, can’t be happy about a loss but I thought they looked the best they have this year against fairly decent opposition in terms of their width and ball use .

    Have to say it also makes the brumbies front row look good because they were really starting to get on top of ours in the match we won.

    Guys that looked a bit down on the speed of the game were a bit of a worry though, Genia and Beau Robinson looked a bit flat. Though Genia showed what he could do once he got some quick ball. We looked better once Gill got involved. Be interesting to see who the reds have coming through in the 3rd openside possie.

    Think Harris is probably best suited to fullback, either that or he needs to make some quicker decisions on attacking the line from in centre to put the defence in two minds.

  • johnny-boy

    It does seem as if the Reds are struggling this year as a result of their coach being distracted by putting in place the structures ready to take over from Drongo Deans sooner, rather than later. That and the announcement of the Reds superb defence coach Matt Taylor leaving next year.
    It is clear that former great players are slowly but surely taking an increasing role in getting Australian rugby back on track and not before time. At least they know what they are doing when it comes to actual rugby, unlike JON.
    I can understand why the Reds struggling and I can accept it, because it is, unfortunately for rabid Reds fan like myself, more important that the Wallabies get a coach they can believe in and Australian rugby gets a Wallaby team they can be proud of, rather than embarrassed by. Both being imperative to see the game hold it’s own in the competitive sporting market of Australia. Something that again, JON doesn’t grasp.
    However Friday night’s game showed that the fat lady ain’t about to sing just yet. There are signs the Reds might be getting their mojo back, just in nick of time, as champion teams do.
    For large parts of the game they couldnt take a trick. It will change. Although a conspiratist might argue that as few as possible are trying to get selected for the interluding tests.
    Horwill played a great captains knock, leading from the front. The Reds scrum is no longer an embarrassment and is showing signs of becoming serious. No doubt in part due to Daley finally learning to keep his back straight on engagement. It has completely transformed the Reds scrum physics and his field play was terrific. It is noticeable that good scrums have the 8 pack at the same time as the others and hit as one rather than the 8 come in later. The Reds havent figured this out yet – sigh. Hanson is playing strongly and will challenge Moore and TPN before long. Slipper is maturing, all too slowly, Simmons the same. Samo will be lucky to keep his contract next year. Just not trying hard enough. Lucas will get better and better with time
    but sadly McKenzie still hasn’t learnt that the more you play players out of position, the more likely they are to get injured due to their unfamiliarity with the position and body angles and ad nauseum you don’t put your point scoring machine in the one of the most heaviest impact positions in the modern game, at 12. It was good enough to protect Cooper out the back last year so it should be good enough to put Harris at fullback too. Harris is showing why he was considered a pretty ordinary, pedestrian 12 in NZ.
    Another classic mistake is taking your best performed player (Tapuai) out of position so you can then, very cleverly, end up with two ordinary players instead of one brilliant and one ordinary player. It’s just plain dumb.
    Now that McKenzie appears to have all the ‘arrangements’ in place for his inevitable rise to Wallaby coach, it’s time for himto knuckle down and show us what he can really do because nobody is going to remember what a great businessman he is if the Reds are getting flushed down the loo. McKenzie will then only be remembered for being a great ….. one season pony.
    C’mon Link time to focus.

  • johnny-boy

    It does seem as if the Reds are struggling this year as a result of their coach being distracted by putting in place
    the structures ready to take over from Drongo Deans sooner, rather than later. That and the announcement of the
    Reds superb defence coach Matt Taylor leaving next year.

    It is clear that former great players are slowly but surely taking an increasing role in getting Australian rugby back
    on track and not before time. At least they know what they are doing when it comes to actual rugby, unlike JON.

    I can understand why the Reds struggling and I can accept it, because it is, unfortunately for rabid Reds fan like myself, more
    important that the Wallabies get a coach they can believe in and Australian rugby gets a Wallaby team they can be
    proud of, rather than embarrassed by. Both being imperative to see the game hold it’s own in the competitive
    sporting market of Australia. Something that again, JON doesn’t grasp.

    However Friday night’s game showed that the fat lady ain’t about to sing just yet. There are signs the Reds might be
    getting their mojo back, just in nick of time, as champion teams do. Although a conspiratist might argue that as few as
    possible are trying to get selected for the interluding test matches .

    Horwill played a great captains knock, leading from the front. The Reds scrum is no longer an embarrassment and
    is showing signs of becoming serious. No doubt in part due to Daley finally learning to keep his back straight on
    engagement. It has completely transformed the Reds scrum physics and his field play was terrific. It is noticeable that
    good scrums have the 8 pack at the same time as the others and hit as one rather than the 8 come in later. Hanson
    is playing well and will challenge Moore and TPN before long. Slipper is maturing, all too slowly, Simmons the same.
    Samo will be lucky to keep his contract next year. Just not trying hard enough. Lucas will get better and better with time
    but sadly McKenzie still hasn’t learnt that the more you play players out of position, the more likely they are to get injured due
    to their unfamiliarity with the position and body angles and you don’t put your point scoring machine in the one of the most
    heaviest impact positions in the game, at 12. It was good enough to protect Cooper out the back last year so it should
    be good enough to put Harris at fullback too. Harris is showing why he was considered a pretty ordinary, pedestrian 12 in NZ.
    Another classic mistake is taking your best performed player (Tapuai) out of position so you can then, very cleverly, end up with two
    ordinary players instead of one brilliant and one ordinary player. It’s just plain dumb.

    Now that McKenzie appears to have all the ‘arrangements’ in place for his inevitable rise to Wallaby coach, it’s time for him
    to knuckle down and show us what he can really do because nobody is going to remember what a great businessman he is
    if the Reds are getting flushed down the loo. McKenzie will then only be remembered for being a great ….. one season pony.
    C’mon Link time to focus, hard.

  • Noisey

    I lost count of the number of chip kicks used on Friday night but the sheer number, combined with the fact that they continued after the half time chat suggests that they were the coaches idea rather than the players. We all applaud a team who stays with the game plan in the face of adversity, so perhaps we should look to the author of said plan rather than beating the players up? Maybe Link was easing the boys into Woodies style?

  • Gallagher

    It seems that aside from the attacking spark we are missing from Ioane and Quade, and the defensive efforts of Ant Faingaa, we also are NOT showing the ability to run with any sort of game plan (Link get the focus back!). I remember last year, ten minutes into a game you could tell if the Reds had the ability to win the game! You could SEE their plan and they where executing. The only random plays came from Quade/Genia. Not this year, its currently back to the way it was before Link arrived, where no-one is playing to a plan.

    LINK, get our boys Rucking it up the middle, making the gain line and kicking either to the corners or just outside their 22 to put the pressure on. With a few of the backs coming back and less continuous unjuries piling up, we are well in the hunt!

    WE ARE RED!!!

Close