InstaReview: Reds v. Sharks – The Dynasty is Over

Steve Timms July 21, 2012 94

No GravatarOn the walk to the stadium I stopped in one of the pubs down Caxton Street to catch the end of the Crusaders versus Bulls game. The Crusaders had done the job and they were through. Now it was the Reds’ turn. I spoke in my preview about what could have been last time the Reds met the Sharks; now it was time to see for sure.

The Reds playing against 16

The Reds came out hard from the kick-off and there was an indication of the feeling involved when a Scott Higginbotham break down the wing was stopped as JP Pieterson looked to rake his hands across Higginbotham’s face. A small stink ensued but referee Kaplan was having none of it as the Reds protested.

The first points came after Kaplan gave the Sharks an advantage for a Reds tackler not releasing. Though the advantage went a long time, it mattered not. Michalak kicked the penalty goal to put the Sharks ahead 3-0.

This seemed to spur them on and they made their way straight back into the Reds territory. A wild Michalak pass to no one was eventually collected and thrown to an unmarked Pieterson on the wing who brushed the cover defence to touch down in the corner. Fred added the extras and the score was 10-0 in the 13th minute.

Though the score line was different from the last time, Ben Lucas‘s match had the same result —though it wasn’t his hammy, he did leave the game with a very bad ankle.

It didn’t take long for the Sharks to take advantage. From an early lineout throw, they worked the ball down the Reds’ half and used quick hands through plenty of phases with lots of ball movement to get Paul Jordaan over the line. Fred added the extras.

The Reds then got a penalty similar to the Sharks’ first, for the tackler not releasing, and they treated it the same way, Mike Harris putting it straight over. The Sharks pulled that straight back from the kick-off. They worked their way into the Reds’ half and Fred Michalak popped a drop goal. The score was 20-3 at that point, three-quarters of the way into the half.

The Sharks defence was massive in the first period of the game. Definitely the difference between the two teams, with the Reds just looking out-muscled. But there was a clear swing in the latter stages of the half; time would tell whether the travel was showing on the Sharks.

There appeared to be a switch in the game then, with the Reds suddenly looking more dangerous. They were stretching and asking questions of the defence. The first big one came from a three-on-two overlap for the Sharks. Yep, two Reds players took on three defenders and the combination of Higgers and Genia was enough to bamboozle them, with the captain crossing for the points. Harris added the extras to make it 20-10 to the Sharks.

This was a good way for the Reds to end the half. They needed to be in a better headspace to get themselves set for the rest of the game.

After oranges the first opportunity for points came from a penalty to the Reds at ruck time, but 40 metres out and 5 metres from the sideline proved too far for Mike Harris.

The next opportunity for points came from a trademark Will Genia pass; unfortunately, it was intercepted by Charl McLeod who raced away and put the ball down under the posts. Michalak added the extras and it was 27-10 to the Sharks.

The Reds kept pressuring the Sharks’ line. A series of scrums five metres out and constant Reds pressure, combined with ruck free-for-all from the Sharks and multiple penalties, eventually led to Kaplan’s issuing a warning to the Sharks. They then got a penalty themselves and took a scrum. They made a mess of that, the pass going dead.

The Reds then got dudded by the TMO (who, in his defence, was protecting Kaplan’s margin bet) when an apparent Liam Gill try was not awarded. The Sharks eventually were given a penalty and they made it out of their half and into the Reds’. They came away with a penalty goal opportunity which they kicked, making the score an unbeatable 30-10 with three minutes to go.

Not much went right at Suncorp tonight

 

The final play of the game was actually Kaplan, who finally found his cards and gave a token yellow to a Sharks player — token, because as he was walking off the field the final hooter blew. Now that the referee had finally shown he was there the Reds were able to actually play and Radike Samo went over for a consolation try. Will Genia added the extras to end the game 30-17.

The free rein the Sharks were given at the breakdown had made the second half a shit-fight. The Reds couldn’t buy a try and Kaplan’s refusal to go to the pocket for his whistle, let alone his cards, ensured the Sharks got the points and would be travelling back to the Republic to take on the Stormers next week. The Reds, even though they played all the rugby, really missed Quade. He would have provided more direction while the Reds bashed away on the line getting nowhere.

Oh well, now Super Rugby is over for us: Go the Wallabies!

Reds 17 (Try: Genia, Gill, Samo Con: Harris 1/1, Genia 1/1 Pen: Harris 1/2) def by Sharks 30 (Try: Pieterson, Jordaan, McLeod Con: Michalak 3/3 Pen: Michalak 2/2 DG: Michalak 1/1)

Man Of The Match: Kaplan Gill

Crowd: 36 571

Discussion

  • cheese

    Good result. The reds didnt deserve to be there anyway.

    • Old Weary

      How so?
      The fact that they finished 1st in the Aus conference?
      Or that they had to fight back from a terrible start to the season without key playmakers and leaders?
      Or they had to score a 4 tries vs the Tah’s (historically always been tight games).
      Maybe you are referring the fact that the Brumbies lost a game they should of easily won, vs one of the worst teams in the comp? Clown

      In regards to the game, that first 20mins killed us. We just had no response, and losing Lucas completely stuffed us (then moving Genia to flyhalf? rather than Harris?)

      Kaplan… I will let other give their 2 cents, but that Gill try was a turning point – 20-17 is a very different game, and I am sick of these ref’s giving last warnings, but never going to their pockets. The offside rule obviously was not being applied.

      Higgers I thought had a cracker of a game, and wish see more of that pasion. Diggers didn’t have a chance to get into the game, but that hit on Mvovo was awesome (wished it was Piterson though). Gill was everywhere, and he will grow into a world class open side in the very near future.

      • ThirstyDog

        THAT HIT… PLAYS OF THE WEEK!!!!!!

        • D.

          The way this judiciary system has been going, I’m surprised he didn’t get cited for being a “great hit”

        • Jay

          Great hit…if it were League, but in Union you have to use your arms in a tackle.

      • Alan

        Ive lost all faith in video ref’s after Dagg’s unequivocal knock on was awarded a try in the saders v force game a week or so ago.
        Not surprised to see Gill’s try being disallowed, video refs appear to be bewilderingly unpredictable lately.

      • mw

        Sorry but the turning point of the game was the intercept. No contest. Gill’s disallowed try was way too late in the game.

    • Brax

      Go & troll on Fox Sports articles mate, that’s where the ignorant comment.

      • nigel

        mmm… nah mate this is definitely the correct forum for ignorance, wearing blinkers, bias and mud slinging. :)

        • Brax

          Well the tone of the place certainly dives when the Kiwi trolls decide to come over from Silverfern et al, Nigel.

  • Alan

    Man that was tough to watch. Yes the Sharks defence was great, yes they adopted the kiwi trait of purposely giving away penalties whenever their 22 was penetrated, yes the Lucas injury really disrupted the reds, yes caplan is utterly shit but ultimately the reds were just shite.

    They looked unorganised and clueless at times while their decision making and handling errors were poor. They really missed Quade’s direction and organising. Thought Genia could managed caplan a bit better, questioned him about the sharks continuous infringements.

    With the Sharks not committing numbers to the breakdown i thought the ideal attack would have been to keep it in tight, relentlessly pick and drive around the rucks, forcing the sharks to commit more numbers – then spread the ball wide. However its the usual story with aussie teams, the forwards were just not up to it.

    Outmuscled, outthought and outplayed.

    • BB

      Didn’t the reds constantly pick and drive when they were five metres from the try line only for the sharks to commit penalty after penalty…
      Yeah the reds didn’t play great but you have to say that the ref had a hand in that in the second half…

      • Fin

        The constant pick and drive reminded me of the tahs ……… so did the scoreboard

        • BB

          Only the tags fuck it up all by themselves … they don’t get penalty after penalty…

  • JDog

    Blaming the ref? Really, come now.

    • http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/ Matt Rowley

      Haha – I know Joely, Saffas would never do that!

  • Jaco Van Der Graftenheitzen

    Isnt it amazing that everytime an Australian team loses its always the refs fault. They were robbed by the TMO to be fair, an Australian I believe.

    • Fantasticbarnsmell

      Classy stuff there mate, you sure showed those Saffas a thing or two by being gracious in defeat here today…

    • Alan

      What i find amazing (and hilarious) is to read a saffa, of all the worlds rugby fans, giving out to others when they are critical of an official

      We just post our 2 cents online whereas the saffas are more inclined to send death threats, intimidate officials and even attack them on the field of play..

    • Mr T

      If only we Reds fans could be as even handed as the Saffa fans were after the world cup quarter final… then Jonathan Kaplan would probably be in a safe house right now.

    • thebigcode

      The words ‘Bryce’ ‘Lawrence’ and ‘World Cup’ all come to mind…

    • redbull

      yep, Matt Fucking Goddard.
      They took a whistle off him a few years but the useless little turd is still thieving oxygen and getting paid for it.

      I don’t have any issues with the result by the way. Sharks played very well and pushed the boundaries.

      Will be cheering for the Chiefs from here in.

  • JJJ

    “free rein”, not “free reign”. 2nd time I’ve seen that here this week.

    • Dave

      The 2nd time for the spelling mistake or the concept?

    • Mumbleblot

      That’s interesting dear. But are you sure? I think free reign also works. But while we are here, and I hope all you children are listening, some other common grammar errors on this site:
      – YOU’RE not “Your”. As in “You’re a pedant” not “Your a pedant”
      – And THEIR not “There”. As in “Their misery was exceeded only by their team’s miserable misbegotten ineptitude during King Kaplan’s free reign”.

      Now children, back to your cornflakes.

      • Dave

        All too true but you wrote, “You’re a pedant” when in fact you should have wrote “I’m a pedant”

        That would’ve been much more accurate.

        • Mumbleblot

          * Quiet cough *

          “You wrote you’re a pedant when you should’ve WRITTEN I’m a pedant.”

          :)

        • Dave

          So pedantic.

          Who are you quoting there by the way? I never wrote anything remotely similar to that. ;-)

          I’m off to have my cornflakes now. Care to join me? ;-) ;-)

          BTW I hope by invoking the winky emoticons you know I have my tongue firmly in my cheek.

  • ThirstyDog

    Outplayed on the night: Certainly
    Actually the better team: Fuck no

    • ThirstyDog

      Answer to the above; Reds, Sharks respectively.

  • Skip

    On a positive note, Dingo gets an extra couple with the whole squad before the tests to really work his magic. We’ll be both well rested & well drilled the defend our remaining cup…. :-s

  • Liam

    Good game, and great Sharks defence.

    Kaplan was genuinely delusional and incompetent. It must be said that it is SANZAR’s fault for appointing this guy to such a big game. He was exposed to criticism on all fronts due to his and his assistant (Craig Joubert) both being from Durban.

    His decision to keep delaying yellow cards was laughable and should be ridiculed rightly from pillar to post. It in fact exposes a huge flaw with rugby, if referees aren’t willing to sin bin earlier for infringements which stop enterprising rugby then rugby becomes the loser at the end of the day.

    Kaplan was not biased as you would suggest, he is just deadly incompetent. And should be shown the door and be kept far and wide from a rugby field. The guy reached his expiry date a few years ago.

    • Touko

      I doubt it would have made a jot of difference. The Reds didn’t have enough bottle last night. Their forwards weren’t tough or ruthless enough to take it to the Sharks and dominate them. Meanwhile, watching the Reds’ backs was like looking at a burglar trying to pick a lock with a piece of spaghetti.

      The Reds really missed their master lock breaker last night, but I still can’t figure out why the hell McKenzie didn’t put Tapuai in at 12 and shift Harris to 10?! They looked horrible with Genia playing at 10.

    • Nutta

      Re picking Kaplan for the reff-spot, I’m reminded of a comment from Knuckles (I think) who yelled at a full-back who dropped a bomb (Matt Pini I think it was): “I don’t blame you son. I blame the dickheads who picked you”

  • Gallagher

    Wow, once again screwed by a dud suspension of quade (like digby’s) and then injury to our backup playmaker, wonder if the highshots will be looked at by the sharks. That was def a try by gill and the dam ref needs to learn to use his cards oh my god! Fairplay to the Sharks for taking their few chances though, ill back em now so NZL don’t win the title. The Reds dynasty is over but good effort considering boys!!!

    • nigel

      good for you bro backing the sharks to prevent a title to NZ.

      there were probably a few people backing the sharks to knock the aussies out of the race this weekend…. tick! great work.

  • G

    Thank goodness the riffraff have been cleaned out. Time for the top teams to battle it out. Crusaders and Sharks looking hot. Good games to come

  • wallawallawallabies

    @Jaco Van Der Graftenheitzen, isn’t it amazing how bryce lawrence hasn’t reffed a game in SA after the world cup… i believe it was due to death threats etc… but that’s not blaming the ref on the loss now is it… it’s a completely different thing…friggin idiot

  • murph

    Sharks constantly offside in defence and st the breakdown
    9 penalties inside their own 22 including at least 4 utterly cynical infringements on their own line and no yellow cards

    Bismarck was popped at least 4 times and there were no penalties

    Holmes was punched in the face in front of the touch judge, who reported it to Kaplan on his mike. Nothing was done by Kaplan.

    An absolute fix from start to finish.

    And people ask what interest the NZRFU have in a fix? I’ll tell you: their pet team, the Cru, don’t have to face the Stormers in CT now and there’s a local derby to bring in the punters. Couple that with the widely held belief in SA and NZ circles (and Australia for that matter) that the Reds are pretenders.

    A fucking disgusting disgrace.

    • Skyblue

      Hay murph the results say it all…az for a dynasty,what a joke you try’d to compare yourselves to the cru never going to happen.get a few trophies under ya belt before staking claims to being the real deal.after this season and tour to sa at the start of the season.yep got to say it.they are pretenders!

      • Trys NOT Kicks

        I reckon that the Aussie conference would be all the stronger if the Aussies themselves supported each other-sure root for you team when they play against other Aussies. But to take pleasure when another Aussie team loses to another nations team? Where is the pride? We should ALWAYS support the another Aussie team.

        • nigel

          so true

    • M

      Kaplan’s approach to handing out yellow cards was exactly the same as Reds v Highlanders. In that game the Reds benefitted from Kaplan’s inaction. Last night it was the Sharks turn.

      I still think the Sharks outplayed the Reds across the park and fully deserved the win.

      I heard an interesting comment from Sean Fitzpatrick that perhaps the Reds were chasing the game too early which played into the Sharks hands.

  • Joey Johns

    Kaplan only gave away 1 penalty in the game for a player going off his feet at the ruck, and that was against the Reds when they were attacking 5m out from the Sharks line.

    Kaplans incompetency is the reason he was dropped from the *cough* “iRB Elite Referee’s Panel” and will never referee an international game again. Hopefully SANZAR jump on board

  • p.Tah

    Com’on G&GR. Some of the comments on here are pretty ordinary.

    • Pie Thrower

      Agreed. C’mon guys – this isn’t foxsports. Let’s keep it on rugby and not silly school yard name calling. We(reds) got spanked. Accept it and move on. Be the bigger man.

    • Old Weary

      First of all this is G&GR not Planet Rugby, Rugby Heaven or Rugby360 – a forum that rightly lets you vent after a loss with others on the same mind.

      Now, did Kaplan lose the game for the reds? I can’t say that. The first 20mins the Sharks were very good, and Kaplan didn’t really play that big a roll in it (although did miss a forward pass to Pieterson’s try).

      However, in the homestretch, he was hopeless and no excuse for a top level ref. Now you talk about ref’s being impartial, but when 2 of the 4 ref’s are from the same town that the one of the team’s is from, it creates an optics that you would think SANZAR would want to avoid. (do recognize the TMO was an Aussie – still don’t understand why that was missed?)

      Anyway, I thought the boys played well, some bad decisions (which they thought they were forced into chasing the score), and I do think Copper would have made a big difference in organizing that attack and hitting all those gap in their defensive line.

      Also, WTF is with Aussie commentators of late? Reds score at 30min mark and the comment was “bringing some respectability to the scoreboard” – they actually pissed me off more that Kaplan for the most part.

      • Dave

        Agree with most of what you said.
        Commentators speak in cliches and cornball sound bites – NZ commentators seem to be the exception – although you do have to put up with their poor attempts to hide their biases – so, occasionally a cliche normally reserved for the last 10 mins is accidentally thrown in in the first.

        Quade would have made a difference, absolutely. Add the appointment of two Durban refs combined with QC’s “Shark’s game” suspension, it’s enough for the conspiracy theorists to cook up some trouble.

        However I doubt he would have made that much of a difference. The Sharks outplayed the Reds last night. They did what was needed to win and the Reds didn’t do enough.

        Disappointing on all fronts, to say the least.

    • nigel

      are you really surprised? come on. you know you’re only reading this for a good laugh, its not like theres anything else here.

  • Pie Thrower

    As a died in the wool reds fan can I say this: fuck that hurt. We were shit, we were outplayed and the Shorks were bigger, were better and deserved to win. No doubt about it. To all the dicks above – Kaplan didn’t impact on the result. We never deserved to win. Open both eyes and accept facts. We should be happy we made the finals given the season we we had with all the injuries… And suspensions thanks to bullshit decisions.

    Anyway – whilst saying all that – it has to be said, why the fuck did SANZAR have a ref from Durban reffing a final involving the sharks? Even if he didn’t influence the game, everytime he made a decision that was dubious or 50/50, it didn’t feel right. It certainly didn’t feel like it was ‘th best fit for the game’. SANZAR need to suck it up and have neutral refs all the time – but it not, at least for the finals.

    Anyway, once again, well done sharks. To the rest of us disappoints red fans – chins up. Let’s not sink to the levels of those beneath us just cause we lost. Remember that we won last year.

    • Skip

      You Sir, are a gent.

    • Brax

      Well said pie thrower, the Sharks were immense with their defense & took their chances, they were worthy winners.
      Whilst I don’t think Kaplan had an influence on the result, he is just a frustrating ref to watch. Only the best & neutral refs should be used in finals Rugby & Kaplan isn’t anywhere near that.
      IMO Link fucked up & cost us that game. Why would you move one of the games premier scrumhalves out to ten, where he was absolute pants there against the same opposition earlier in the season, and bring on a rookie at 9 (no disrespect to Frisby, I think he’ll be a god player in time) when you ave Tapuai sitting on the bench who could slot into 10 or move Harris in one with Taps at 12. It beggars belief & was a tactical mistake with huge repercussions. This is where Reds fans should be directing there frustrations instead of moaning about the crap refereeing. A good team should be able to overcome a poor reffing performance.

      Also don’t like the title of this article. One championship does not a dynasty make, so how can something be over if it has not begun? Also a dynasty is proven over time, the Reds will be back wiser & stronger next season to prove to mugs that they aint no “pretenders”

      • Robson

        Couldn’t agree more. It seemed insane to take the world’s best scrum half out of his position when you have got a genuine 10 and 12 already available. Couldn’t follow that at all. Looked like panic stricken clutching at straws to me.

        • Cabtab

          I also agree, I think Link (deans?) used his bench poorly and using players out of position was a huge mistake.

        • johnny-boy

          Except Robson, Harris is a terribly ineffective No. 10 as he showed earlier in the season. I thought it was the right decision to move Genia to 10 to try and provide some spark. Harris is making great improvements at inside centre tho but Tapaui is such class Harris will have to move to fullback. He missed a crucial kick last night because he’d just been smashed. You want your prime kicker with a clear head .

        • Robson

          I agree that Harris is struggles at 10 sometimes, but I think the man that really needed to be on the paddock at that time was Tapuai not Fisby.

  • what a hoot

    I havent visited this site for a long time and reading some of the comments I remembered why. The Sharks travelled and played an outstanding game both in attack and defense. The lack of grace in defeat and disgusting booing of the ref at the end of the match and the inability of your captain to not grant how well the Sharks played sure tells us something about Aussie supporters. Im sorry the ref wasnt a Kiwi as the result would have been the same.

    • Ted

      Absolutely. It was really appalling to hear the crowd booing at every opportunity and not what a good game of rugby should be about. As far as Kaplan goes, there were at least half a dozen forward passes from the Reds not called, so it works both ways. Sharks took the flight over and got a comprehensive win. Congratulations on getting to the semi-finals. Deserved.

    • Lee Enfield

      The crowds reaction to the ref was spot on. If the crowd can cheer when happy, they can boo when unhappy. The only way a crowd can let their feelings be known about the sub standard officiating is by booing.
      If you don’t like booing, then you should not condone cheering. Maybe the crowd should just sit there without expressing emotion in any form and without making a sound.
      The Sharks deserved their win and played well, but it still doesn’t change the fact that Kaplan was incompetent and/or a cheat.

    • nigel

      hilarious to remember back to the world cup, and now read these comments. aussie fans, defending their right to boo. classic.

      • Brax

        There is a huge difference between booing to show displeasure at some rough refereeing decisions and the attempt by chip on the shoulder Kiwis trying to assassinate the character of a talented player.

        • bill

          Didn’t realise the non reds fans were such blushing virgins, I can recall with some pleasure the ballymore crowd chanting in harmony “the ref is a dickhead”. So I think mere booing is kind of easygoing by that crowd. …and Kaplan deserved it.

          cup of concrete saffas n kiwis? yes, I’m aware that’s pretty much what your gloating criticism implys.

  • stillatragic

    Well done Sharks. Reds were outplayed today, but only a fool or a very biased observer would say that Kaplan did not influence the game. Would the Reds have won without that influence? Hard to say. Playing against 14 (or 13) men if the yellow card was used, and a try up (Gill’s) would have changed the game for sure. Still, the Reds did not adapt to Lucus’s injury and the use of Frisby instead of Tapuai was a monumental and game changing mistake I think. So well done Reds. Think where you were mid season, with injury and judicial excesses, and to make the Finals was a worthy result.

    • johnny-boy

      Well said Stillatragic. The Sharks were on fire for sure and the Reds just had one of those ugly days at the office that all teams have from time to time. Some more than others :). You only have to look at the Bulls against the Crusaders the night before. The Crusaders were off their normal high standard but the Bulls were freaking awful. Even the Reds last night would have beaten them easily. Kaplan must retire or be retired. I don’t usually criticise refs as it is usually pointless and good teams rise above it, and I usually don’t mind him as a ref as he lets a game flow and cut some slack, but that performance was beyond tolerable. The non awarding of Gills try, which was probably in part due to the TMO, seriously damages SANZARS credibility. It reminded me of All Black teams touring South Africa in the late 1960′s and 70′s and wondering why they could never win. I can understand Joubert helping the All Blacks to stumble over the line at the World Cup because otherwise NZ would have been suicide central but last night was a truly breathtaking refeering debacle. Very sad for rugby imo..

  • ryano

    Is this what this country has become after a defeat? Australia used to be about good sportsmanship, win or lose, but judging from some of the comments on here, we have become a nation of whingers and bad sports who resort to childish name calling. Maybe its just todays society who is to blame, as after all, nobody stands up to take the blame anymore, its always someone.elses fault

    • Old Weary

      Nice troll, you idiot.

      Most comets are saying what everyone knows – the score is printed and Sharks are going through. They turned up after a long flight, and took it to the Red’s – and they were caught napping. Their intensity at the breakdown was superior, they found holes out wide to easily and their defensive structure was better than has been most of the season. We were chasing the game form the start.

      Was Kaplan crap – yes he was, no question. He missed a lot, and I do think it changed the score – but to the same token (as any game where Ref’s are being ‘lenient’ on offside rules, ruck infringements or handing out yellow cards), so much is placed on the captain. I can only think Sir Richie would have been all over Kaplan, pointing out these facts – Genia simply did not.

      • ryano

        My comment was posted about some of comments that have now (thankfully) been deleted calling all Saffas c##k sucking homos and other things. Now that, I believe, is taking things too far.

  • James

    I’d prefer anyone but the cru. So not 100%

  • Skip

    One of the most entertaining games i ever played started with the ref coming into our changing shed & saying “here is your official warning, any cynical stuff and in you’re in the fucking bin”. The opposition lock tested him, got binned and as he trudged off the ref said to their skipper “don’t look surprised & don’t say it’s only a few minutes in, you had your warning & he knew exactly what he was doing which was cheating”. Rest of the game saw a hat full if tries and a lot of fun.

  • Mr T

    From where I was sitting, we were beaten everywhere. In particular, the intensity at the breakdown was a clear win to the Sharks.

    No question I’m disappointed with the result but what can you do? 2012 wasn’t our year.

  • Raggamad78

    Sure the ref had a bad game which in turn was why the reds were clueless, It was very hard to see any game plan but realized maybe milking for a yellow was the plan which obviously never happened. Mackenzie got this one so wrong, moving the ball side to side instead of keeping it tight and the use of the bench. Harris at 10 and taps at 12 straight from Lucas’s exit would have made a difference and this would have given genia the mind space to question the refs usage of the yellow card. Great game plan by the sharks, they applied the umbrella defence very well and cashed in on every chance they got. Win well deserved, I’m sad the reds are out but happy on the over all season performance.

  • Slim 293

    What a disappointing article.

    I expect better from this site.

  • http://www.mudchooks.com Steve Timms

    Well, Having had some time to think this one over and re-read I have a couple of things to add.

    Posts like the above are written literally “As it happens”. When I am writing about a try or a referee decision it is written when that try or decision is happening. It’s taking into account the crowd reaction, what I am hearing over the refs mic, what I am seeing live, there is no after thought. Quite often the mood of what is being said changes as the flow of the game goes on. Sadly, the sometimes means I am being a bit like a Marto or a Kearns and let some personal feelings into it, sorry, I am human and experiencing it just like everyone else.

    On this post:

    1. The Sharks were awesome. They were up for it and physically and mentally were never going to let this one go. I didn’t give them nearly enough credit above.

    2. Listening to the Refs mic, it was blatantly obvious that Kaplan was not having a great game. the language and manner were completely different depending which teams players he was talking too. He also gave more than one final warning to the Sharks for infringements at the ruck. Yet they continued to infringe without sanction ruck after ruck. Do I think he altered the result? No. The Reds were not as up for this game as the Sharks. The Sharks were better and more physically dominant, which makes their decision to constantly infringe, and the lack of sanction for it, all the more baffling. It just could have been better.

    Hope that helps and I understand the criticism. I am not a ref basher by nature, but this performance really got to me. I am probably more disappointed in SANZAR that their appointments let it happen. Given there were only two games this weekend, surely they could have been smarter with their appointments.

    • Robson

      Fair nuff.

      People are allowed to express their disappointment and feelings are all part of sports entertainment. If they weren’t it wouldn’t be entertainment; and it wouldn’t be sport either. It’s when feelings burst the banks of reasonable objectivity and flow into abusiveness that it becomes unacceptable.

      I don’t think any of the comments in the lead article are in any way unreasonable or unacceptable.

    • Dave

      Yeah fair enough Timmsy. I didn’t find your comments to be one sided or too critical at all (maybe I’m biased though). Besides which, I don’t come some here for impartiality. After all the name of the website is indicative of who we support, is it not?

  • jt

    Plan B – with an inexperienced 9, and moving Genia to 10 – turned out to be a pretty poor option. With that lineup, the Reds never looked cohesive or threatening. I thought that surely Mackenzie would restructure things at half time, but instead he stuck with this formula. Surely Genia 9, Harris 10, Tap 11 was what they needed. Harris was one of few players regularly getting over the advantage line, so they took him off….just weird…

    • Brax

      Turned out to be? It was blatantly obvious from the moment it happened! I was also baffled as to why Harris was subbed, he was one of our best.

      Anyway, I liked the Sharks play and hope that they can go all the way to the title. With defense like that I reckon they can, even with the hard road of travel they have ahead.

      • Robson

        I don’t think Harris could fathom it either.

        • tommy

          It would be helpful for my mental heeling process if Link could explain why the fck he put Genia to 10 & also subbed Harris. If we had scored two miraculous tries in the last 10 minutes, he was going to kick the clutch conversions?

          No pro rugby in Oz for 2 weeks. What a cluster fck.

        • baz

          Harris, who was concussd early in last weeks game, took another head knock just before the missed penalty attempt. Likely pulled for safety reasons when game looked un-winnable. Kaplan may not be the best ref any more but he should never have been appointed to that “no win” position

    • mw

      It’s interesting that Mike Harris is now not even Reds 3rd best No 10.

  • Don

    I find it hard to believe all the Aussies r criticizing Kaplan for fouls committed by the sharks but you fail to point out all the blatant obstruction, playing men without the ball that the reds were doing the entire game . Higginbottam obstructing the scrumhalf repeatedly . Also isn’t it against the law for the props hand to b on the ground which slippers was on the ground @ every scrum . Kaplan is a crap ref and shouldn’t have been reffing this game but he is not the reason the sharks won. They won by defending better, scoring more points and not losing there cool but the negative tactics employed by the reds.
    And genia learn to give credit where credit is due sour poes .

    • Sharks_Lover

      Well said Don,Although Kaplan is not normally a bad ref i have to agree he did not have a great day on the whistle, Fact is he made mistakes towards both teams.

  • Chairman

    Well rounded off Timmsy, hard not to think throughout the game that the ref was having a shocker, but then so were the Reds. The better team won.

  • Brumby Jack

    Firsty, well done to the Sharks on their win. Having to travel all the way over from RSA and not arriving til Monday night then fronting up like they wanted to win is an immense effort.

    Their defensive effort won them this one and hats off to them for that.

    Kaplan didn’t have his best game but that happens and it takes a great team to rise above that and move on with the game. Maybe Horwill’s captaincy was lacking there when the questions about cards should have been asked earlier? The yellow at the end seemed an excuse to rack up Kaplan’s quota for the season.

    The TMO incident should be a reason for the SANZAR people to look into how the question from the referee should be asked. The ‘tell me why I can’t ward a try’ and ‘try, yes/no?’ isn’t clear enough and this isn’t the first game this year when a BS TMO decision has changed the game. (Chiefs/Hurricanes last week comes to mind)

    The replacement of Lucas that saw Genia at 10 was baffling to say the least. Frisby probably can do the job but in a game of such importance I don’t know why it wasn’t 9) Genia, 10) Harris, 12) A Finger or even Tapuai off the bench? Genia at 10 didn’t work in Durban so I don’t know how it would magically work now.

    But well done to the Reds to getting where they did considering they were down to their 5th fly half at one stage this season and losing their captain for a chunk of it too.

    • Fin

      I don’t often give the NRL any credit but their ‘Benifit of the Doubt ‘ to the attacking team rule, when applied consistently would work well.

  • Robson

    It was hard to watch this game and not be aware of all the little ajudication and substitution issues that seemed to be cluttering it up, but it was also hard not to notice (starkly so) how infinitely superior to the Reds the Sharks were in both their mindset and their execution.

    Despite all the TMO, refereeing and field replacement issues, you would have to have cork eyes and be brain dead not to realise that the Sharks absolutely deserved their win last night.

    It was painful to watch, but damn that is the way it goes sometimes. And it is during such times that I almost wish I was a Crusaders supporter because then there would be a lot fewer of them.

  • Mica

    I’ll keep it short and to the point.

    1) Sharks deserved their win. To travel to Suncorp and put in the performance that they did, both defense and attack was immense. I thought that the reds were lucky not be further behind at half time.

    2) Reds depth suffers when we lose our first and second choice fly halves – Australia in general just doesn’t have the rugby depth of the other top flight nations. Case in point NZ at Rugby RWC – lose Carter, lose Slade, even lose Cruden in the final and Donald steps up – now Beauden Barret arrives on the scene. Australia has nothing like this depth.

    3) Frisby and Genia share scrumhalf duties with Genia playing flyhalf in attack when you have options of Harris at 10 and either Ant Finger moving to IC and Digby moving to OC or bring Taps into IC??? Even after the sub had been made and it wasn’t really working why not move Frisby to the wing and have the backline shuffle infield by one?

    4) Cheering and booing is how a crowd involves itself in the game. It’s based on performance of a team or individual. It seems that all supporters think that Kaplan had a crap game (and he did). He let both teams infringe in various ways. He forgot what offside was at the ruck and I recall Genia standing next to Mcleod (and a mile offside) at a scrum that the Sharks had turned that led to a mistake by the Sharks and huge attacking opportunity for the Reds in the middle of the second half. He also let Pietersen knock the ball out of the scrum half’s hands whilst he was lying in a ruck and no yellow card for the textbook example of cynical play. I wouldn’t sanction booing a ref by the crowd for a isolated mistake (it happens) or 50/50 calls (with both eyes open), but really how else can the crowd let a participant in a professional game know that he has had an absolute shocker.
    Now will the referee review panel act???

    5) I don’t buy into the he’s from SA so he favours the SA team. The Sharks players may be more familiar with how he refs a game and where the ref may be more lenient in some areas but to think that he blatantly and deliberately cheats to support the team where he resides in misguided. As I’ve stated above and some of our SA friends have stated he made some appalling calls that favoured the Reds too!!

    Let’s hope that the last 3 games have a much better standard of refereeing for the benefit of all rugby lovers!!!

    Damn it looks like it wasn’t really that short after all

    Cheers and good luck to the remaining teams supporters

    Mica

  • Dave

    Pretty poor performance by the Reds in that first 20 minutes. Good performance by the Sharks though. Overall it typified the Reds season. Creulled by injury and bad luck and therefore never really given the chance to gain momentum.
    But in retrospect and with a bit of the what-could-have-beens, take the intercept try (always a cheap way to get points) out of it and rightfully award Gill’s try and the Reds are very much in it. A completely different game.

    Genia at 10 didn’t really work, but maybe Link realised the Sharks came to defend Genia at 9 and leaving him there was redundant. He didn’t look too bad and his pass is better than Harris’. If the aim was to spread them wide it was working but the Sharks really came to play.
    Something has to be done about Digger’s attacking options. It’s clear opposition teams are playing special attention to him, hence his lack of tries. If he works on the offload or if he has more support runners, there is space for others. Oh well, have to wait for next season.

    On Kaplan, all too typical performance, pedantry in some areas and total oblivion in others.

  • Big Ted

    Agree the sharks were the better team last night, but the reds were uncharacteristically sloppy. Quade not being there obviously didn’t didn’t help, but generally across the park, too many pushed passes and lost balls in contact. Higgers, god love him, still loses possession too often into contact, but I believe he was the only red showing some gumption and sticking it too the big saffas!

    But on to more pressing issues… What is going on with Rugby development in general in Australia? I am aware that we don’t have as many registered players as NZ or SA, but:

    our 20′s almost finished out of the top 10 teams at this years rugby champs

    Our general depth, especially in key positions, is severely lacking

    We would currently be one of the only teams in the top tier rugby nations who have to reshuffle a pack or a back line if someone is unavailable, rather than a straight swap for an incumbent

    I don’t like anyone telling us we are well behind the eight ball, let alone a kiwi coaching a South African team, but I unfortunately have to agree with John Plumtree on this one.

    Question is…Where to from here?

  • Sharks_Lover

    Just for those really crying about the ref? Do yourself a favour, whipe the tears from your eyes first, then go watch the match again and if possible try be a little objective to start with?

    The reds first try had the Officials been awake should not have been, Forward pass from Genia to the 8thman, and well forward….

    Bosman falls just short of the reds goaline, gets called a knock on, there was no knock on, The Sharks lock picks up before the refs whistle and scores, ref in the act of scoring does not go for the TMO? why? was it a linesman call?? so no legitimate try is allowed.

    There is so much ilegal off the ball stuff from the Reds, Ref blind to this?? I am crying about the Ref here, just pointing out that calls went for and against for both teams, and the bad sportsmanship from some, but specially the Reds capt Genia is truelly pathetic.

    But before you fly off the wheel? go watch calmly again, you might just be surprised at what you see….

    • Sharks_Lover

      Meant to say in my post

      I AM NOT CRYING ABOUT THE REF

  • Cave Dweller

    Maybe the Reds supporters should stop blaming the referee for a change and just accept the fact that their team weren’t good enough.

    One thing is I want to know is if Cooper was allowed on the pitch as he was suspended. Surely he is not allowed to enter the playing field. I wonder what the ruling is with that.

Close