The Hux Files: VIDEO – that set-piece move dissected

Julian Huxley October 19, 2012 22

No GravatarYou have to admire the fighting spirit of Austalian rugby teams. It has often been said that when the Wallabies’ backs are against the wall they come out with a big performance. And this they did against Argentina last week.

Many pundits think nothing less than a 20-point victory against teams such as Argentina is a pass mark. Anyone who has played in Argentina will tell you that a win over there is as good as it gets, no matter what margin. The Wallabies had the unfortunate task of following the All Blacks, and the comparison is unfair. To win with the injury toll within the camp was a great effort.

There was some great play too, including Digby Ioane’s match winning try — below.

There are really only two options for Kurtley in this play, Tapuai and Digby. You’ll notice as Kurtley goes to the line that he’s never thinking of Pat McCabe. But why this move?

Look how close together the Pumas backs are. They start narrow and are drifting hard from the outset. When playing a hard, drifting defence it’s imperative that someone changes the angle to cut off a defender. Ben Tapaui does this very well and as the 12 commits to him, the 13 continues drifting and Digby goes straight through for the try.

So how do you defend this move? As I said, you can see that Kurtley can’t really play Pat McCabe. His body language suggests that he’s never going wide. Attacking the line and watching what the defenders do stops Kurtley making the necessary preparations to pass long (i.e. spotting his target and balancing).

If a10 attacks the line like this good defences will actually flip the scenario mid-stream. They will stop worrying about the overlap, play ‘man-on’ defence and take line speed. With time for only one long pass, the advantage lies now with the defending team. You’ll note how often receivers of long passes these days are hit as they catch the ball, often with two unused men outside.

Sounds very simple, except for one thing: if you decide before the play to just take linespeed and not drift, attacking teams will play early and get outside you. They no longer need to commit the defense by taking the ball at the line because the defence has committed itself. This allows the attack to remain deeper, giving it the time needed to execute the passes. The trick for defending teams is changing gears, when to stop worrying about the width and just commit to the short runners.

The biggest cue to change gears is when the attacking 10 runs at the line. With the pressure a defence can exert on the attack with line speed, it will take a miracle for the ball to reach the overlap, and if it does, it certainly won’t happen often. But this is why players like Kurtley Beale are called geniuses – they work miracles, and when they do all you can do is clap!

Meanwhile in the land of France, it’s blowing a gale and pissing rain ahead of a massive match for us (Narbonne) this weekend. One of our two grudge matches for the year is on this weekend against neighbouring Carcasonne. The whole town is pumped and I’ve been advised to do next week’s food shopping tomorrow in case we lose. Should the unthinkable happen, the townsfolk are apparently quite animated with their feedback.

Ciao for now!!

Hux

Discussion »

  • Barbarian

    Great analysis Hux, as usual.

    Love Marto’s last words before that play- “Digby is the normal one, but he’ll be a decoy this time”. Good call champ.

  • stinger

    Thanks for the insight Hux.Sat night, first scrum outside our 40m I would like to see us run the same lines, except Kurtley goes face ball long to McCabe who doesn’t even think but passess to Harris who then makes the decision on hitting AAC or taking em on or…

    Thoughts???

  • Seb V

    Coaching after you retire as a player?

  • Doctor D

    Exciting for the Wallabies. Just another day at the office for the Reds.

    The lack of plays like this and not playing to our strengths is what shits most Wallaby supporters.

    Good analysis though Hux, do you think we would have got away with this against the All Blacks or South Africa?

  • Bay35Pablo

    Huh, I lost you at drifting.

    Scrum, ruck, rip, tackle …… lot simpler in the forwards. None of this confusing stuff. No wonder you backs all stand around looking confused all day. :)

  • pants

    Don’t they have servants to do their balancing for them?

  • Brumby Runner

    As Deans has apparently been quoted as saying that a try should never be able to be scored from 1st phase, I wonder if Nick Scrivener might have influenced this play. Always had Vikings and/or Brumby Runners playing attacking football years ago.

    • Nelse

      I haven’t seen the full quote by Deans so I don’t know its context, but could he have been saying that from a defensive viewpoint? As in, for players either side to be matched up and ready for the attack, then you really shouldn’t be letting any in?

  • mad italian flyhalf

    That quote from Deans left me shocked.

    Though defence are still not under pressure, actually first phase movement are the easiest to find space, as 16 men are packed in 4-5 squared meters, and the defence are forced to keep at least 2 men back (generally 3 with one quickly closing the gap and defending up front if ball are spinned wide).

    It really shocked me also because 2010 Wallabies used to score so many tries from first phase moves, that excited us all!

    BTW this is one of the 2 or 3 Wallabies’ moves brought by Deans.
    One of the most effective, the second one is the same movement of the centres, with the ball out to the drifting 12 (backdoor to the decoy), but with the winger coming inside him.

    In the great Wallaby Mashup video of 2010, you can see them both: this one against England in Perth (Ioane breaks, Gits scores), the other one I mentioned allowed Mitchell to score against Bokke in Bloemfontain (though not 1st phase) and another line break (no try from it) from Mitchell maybe in Pretoria or still Bloem…

    If well executed, these 2 movements are (especially the one seen with Mitchell in 2010), IMO, impossible to defend for the first line defence, to stop that defence need a second line defender covering.

    I’d like to see more of that from the Wallabies!

  • Chunderstruck

    When I saw this try I couldn’t help feeling it looks a bit like obstruction… Anyone else think that?

    • Julian Huxley

      Glad you asked! There is a key distinction that not even ref’s understand all the time. When a defender CHOOSES to tackle the decoy the attacking team has done its job and shouldn’t be penalised. Not even crossing should be punished. The only time a penalty for obstruction should be given is when a defender is attempting to make a tackle on the ball carrier or the player receiving the pass and is obstructed from doing so. The Argie in this clip was never trying to tackle Digby and was thus not obstructed!!

      • Mart

        Hux. What are your thoughts on a very similar”sliders” style move that the waratahs got penalized for.
        I’m sure the clips on YouTube. AAC went through and scored. Rory Sidey tackled Horne.
        Ref right or wrong?

        • Julian Huxley

          I remember that one, ref definitely wrong. In my book the defender must be attempting to make a tackle on the ball carrier or player receiving the ball. He shouldn’t be rewarded for tackling the decoy and then flailing his arms about in embarrassment!

        • Mart

          Agreed. The fact that the wrong guy was tackled means the moved worked perfectly

  • mad italian flyhalf

    I think it’s been more the defender willingly chased Tapuai rather than Tapuai obstructed him…

  • Mickeyb

    I love this site! Great analysis Hux.

    Simply, this site has totally reshaped the way I’m watching and now thinking about my rugby.

    From the macro (where the phases of play are heading and attempting to understand the tactics) to micro reads on ‘real time’ plays and analysing player body language (shoulders, hips, hands and head) player positioning and running lines.

    It’s an absolute credit to all involved and the hours you all put in behind the scenes that make this such a damn fine ‘thinking mans’ rugby site!

    Bloody Wonderous!!

    • Digby the WonderDog

      Not to mention also putting a smile on my face.

    • http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/ Matt Rowley

      Thanks mate – good to hear

  • Johnny-boy

    Thanks Hux. Quality stuff. Are all backs this smart ?

  • Big Hux

    Have a great game this weekend mate.

  • leftarmspinner

    hux, fantastic summary for us mere mortals!!!!!! I jsut love the way you describe the essence of rugby attack V defence.

    We would do well to get more people to appreciate the essence of this contest because the other contest, the breakdown, is completely confusing to all, including the elite players.

  • Persona Non Grata

    I hope all of you appreciate that you are watching the coaching credentials of one J. Huxley being cemented. This insightful analysis cannot be lost to the game after he comes back from his “French holiday”.

    If his skills are not taken up by a club, hopefully the Rebels, then Australian rugby administrators are fools.

Close