The Reds by Numbers: Back from the Brink with Link

Skip May 16, 2012 14

No GravatarAfter the great feedback I got for the article on the ARU numbers (see here), overlord Gagger gave me the go ahead to look at some of the Australian super sides from the same angle.  As befits their status as champions, I shall start with the Reds, (their reports are here).  It’s no secret that quite recently the QRU was in deep financial trouble, I would go so far as to say that they were pretty close to the brink.

 

Reds – saved by a dollop of Link?

Staving off Disaster

In fact, the finances at the Suncorp got so bad the ARU threw in some cash to stave off disaster.  The acid test figure for last year is a very low 0.44 (the QRU can pay slightly less than half its short term obligations).  This figure of 0.44 is up from a jaw-droppingly low 0.17 in 2009, reflecting the cash loan from big John and more income from bigger crowds.  Like I said last time, the ARU run at 1.85 and the Tahs are at 1.34.  The Reds have done well to get this level climbing to so quickly, but keep going as this is a real concern.

As you’d expect from a winning side with bigger crowds, revenue has jumped from a little over 18 Million in 2010 to 24.8 Million in 2011.  An increase of around 25% in a year is good in anyone’s books so well done.

 

Cash Flow

Next, the bit that keeps all CEOs awake at night – cash flow.  Poor cash flow can kill even a profitable company and it was hurting the Reds badly.  In 2009 and 2010, this was a ‘concerning’ (terrifyingly low) negative 600 grand and 1.6 million respectively.  That’s another way of saying that in those two years, those amounts of money flowed OUT of the organization.  Thanks to a large dollop of Link, the last annual report sees this leap to a more pleasing plus 3.7 Million.  It’s good that their CEO took action when needed and I imagine they’ll keep moving this in the right direction.  Another “well done but don’t stop now”.

The last finance metric is the QRUs cash level (as distinct from cash flow).  In 2009 they had 39,000 dollars in the bank but now they have over 740,000.  This ties in with the climb in the acid test figures as the QRU puts itself on a safer financial footing and, like those figures, the cash level probably needs to go to up.  As things stand, if they got into strife for some unexpected reason (say, a terrible flood) might be forced to sell assets or ask the ARU for help again.  It’s an uncertain business, sports and the reality is they need to hold more cash than firms in other markets.  Well done – keep going.

 

Player numbers

Like the ARU, the QRU have reported a good increase in player numbers in its patch, up by 30% (a lot at the school level).  Has there been some discussion on the need to ensure that these young guys have a good path to the top?  Does this tie in with a third tier?  I think so.  Anyway, this reflects good work by the backroom staff and indicates a good strategy.  Well done.

 

The Benefits of a Winning side

So what difference does a winning team make to the numbers?  Quite a bit it seems, as the graph indicates – the money comes rolling in and with it the profits, which go up from around minus 3 million in 2009 to around 1.5 million in the black last year.  Winning gets cheaper as well when the crowds get bigger.  In 2009 the win per revenue was nearly 5.7 million but last year it was 1.9 million, meaning they got quite a bit more efficient at generating wins.

 

Fearless Prediction

The crowds have been moving in the right direction.  I estimate that if they hold 2010 crowd levels (when they didn’t make the playoffs) the finances will be at the right levels in 2 to 3 years, maybe sooner.  This is good, as relying on uncertain revenue sources is very risky.

So, what are we to make of this?  The Reds have some financial issues for sure but the way they have turned things around, especially from the dark days of 2009, is pretty impressive.  For sure the winning side really makes it easier but they have a good joined up strategy as well.  Overall, there are some concerns with the numbers but the management seems to have a grip on them and have moved them in the right direction 3 years in a row.

Discussion »

  • http://landoftheunit.wordpress.com/ Sully

    It looks like the average crowd this year will be higher than last year. That has to be a good thing. But if they miss the finals, and that seems likely, they miss out on a fair chunk of revenue.

  • Thesharpedge

    I am an avid Reds fan, who has been a family season ticket holder for a number of years. Whilst I love the Reds I am extremely disappointed in their ticketing strategy that they will implement from next season. My seats (4 tickets 2 adult and 2 children) have been upgraded from gold to platinum this year and as a loyal fan was able to keep my seats this year at the gold price. From next year if I want to keep my current seats I will have to pay the platinum price which has no family package – meaning I have to pay top dollar for 4 seats rather than the cuurent family package where you pay for 2 adults and get 2 children tickets for free.

    Whilst I love the reds I am extremely disappointed with this drive of squeezing loyal supporters for more money. Whilst people say there is not a bad seat at Suncorp I chose my seats to get the best view I possibly could.

    If I choose to continue supporting the Reds. I will have to downgrade by view.

    I think season ticket member numbers will reduce next year due to this change and not necessarily due to the Reds going back to back.

    All in all I will always be a Reds fan and hope they win the title on foreign soil. But management need to get the balance right in revenue generation vs looking after their long term fans.

    • Bay35Pablo

      Find out who their memerbship/ticketing manager is and have a whinge. They don’t know unless someone tells them often …

    • Skip

      I feel your pain. A better solution would be to offer those who have had season tickets since the dark days a reduced rate to keep their seats. I can imagine it must really piss you off.

      Your comments about season ticket holders refers to the marginal costs / marginal revenues calculation to determine optimal costs, which is cold comfort to you, I’m sure, if they get it wrong.

  • bill

    better to have bums on seats than empty ones.

    • RedMan

      What about when the seats have been purchased by members, but they don’t show up? I hate seeing lots of great seats wasted. Good for the cash flow, but not for the game.

  • Go For Gold

    Great write up – love the behind the scenes stuff.

    thesharpedge’s comments should be a bit of a concern. i know there are different options ie 3 game memberships etc but for a family it’s getting pretty hard on the wallet.

    Then again i pay about $80/m just to watch the rugby on Foxtel…. All games live + IQ2 + HD = awesome. And the missus has an endless supply of crap shows to watch.

    • Cantab

      A book commits suicide every time you watch jersey shore.

      • Skip

        That’s gold.

  • johnny-boy

    Great information Skip.

  • Reds

    Loyalt does need t be rewarded and a good way would be for pre purchase of memberships now with discounts etc tiered to keep exisitn members but also to generate new members. Existing members must be offered first rights on seats – period. Itis with these members that the game stays liquid each year. Also wil drove to see the sums on stadium costs – could some seats be sold cheaper to not effect the bottom line? A few $10-20 seats would fill up the park build some base business and allow them to yield ticket prices as demand grows. Also charge the kiwis more I was like Hamilton on Sunday without the cowbells or chainsaws!

  • Peter Robson

    I hope you can do this for the VRU and the Rebels – who of course are separate entities. I’m a Rebels member but we get sod all info on how we are going from a business perspective – what are our membership numbers etc – certainly lower than last year from the evidence in the Weary Dunlop Club – the queue at the bar is no longer a big problem. No real complaints but it would be good to be sure that what we have now is going to be sustainable as a privately owned concern into the future.

    BTW last Saturday night was unbelievable – I look forward to boring my grandchildren to death with (to steal from Max Boyce) “I was there when …..”.

  • Noisey

    We have a bunch of families who all buy family season tickets year in year out, but without exception we are refusing to purchase the higher priced tickets from next year. Other families I talk to feel the same. McCall should have paid more attention to economics at St Columbans. This will bite them.

  • Pingback: Waratah Finances: The Toughest Market of them all - Green and Gold Rugby

Close