Video Analysis: Rebels Scrum Issues

Scott Allen April 20, 2012 20

No Gravatar

Watching the Rebels scrum performance against the Blues two weeks ago was painful. 

The Rebels started with a front row of Nic Henderson, Adam Freier and Rodney Blake against Tony Woodcock, Keven Mealamu and Charlie Faumuina. From the first scrum the Rebels were under pressure and they were further disrupted with Freier being injured and replaced having packed only one scrum. 

After just three scrums referee Bryce Lawrence had awarded one penalty against Blake for binding on the arm and a free kick against him for moving so that there was a head on head situation.  The Rebels coaching staff obviously sensed that Lawrence was getting frustrated with Blake and he was replaced by Laurie Weeks after 22 minutes and before the fourth scrum of the match.  The decision reminded me of Robbie Deans replacement of Al Baxter after 30 minutes against the All Blacks in 2009 after he was penalised on multiple occasions by Jonathon Kaplan.

Unfortunately for the Rebels the introduction of Weeks made little difference and when he had to leave the field with a dislocated shoulder, Blake came back on.  The Rebels scrum continued to be under pressure all match and in the second half Lawrence penalised Blake for not taking the hit.  Between them Blake and Henderson gave away five penalties and free kicks at scrum time during the match and both sides of the scrum were under pressure throughout.  Were the penalties Lawrence awarded against the Rebels justified? Was the Blues scrum really that dominant?  The answer to both questions was clearly yes.

So was it just that the Rebels came up against a very good Blues scrum?  To answer that question I looked in more detail at the Rebels scrum against the Blues and last week against the Brumbies.

Similar problems existed against the Brumbies and this time it was Craig Joubert who was penalising Henderson and Blake for scrum infringements.  Once again Blake was penalised for not taking the hit.

Here’s footage of the fifth scrum of the game against the Blues whilst Weeks was on the field.

It’s rare to see a team make this much ground from a scrum and this shows the depth of the problems with the Rebels scrum.  So what improvements do the Rebels need to make to compete effectively at scrum time?

Let’s start with what should happen in the scrum. Every single player in the forward pack has a role to play in the scrum but no matter what the other six players in the pack do, the foundations of the scrum are built upon the two props.  The following image shows the All Black scrum with the whole pack in a good, low position.  Importantly the whole pack is at the same height and their strong body positions with flat backs means that the weight of the entire eight can be transferred straight through to the opposition. Of course if your props are not low with a good body shape, that weight doesn’t get transferred effectively through to the opposition.

If you were trying to design a really good scrumaging prop I’d summarise what you’re looking for as 1) physical strength 2) the right attitude 3) good technique and 4) knowledge of the dark arts.  I didn’t include size as one of the elements because whether a prop is small or large, size issues can be overcome through strength, good technique and a good attitude.

Which of those four elements is the most important will probably vary depending on who you’re talking to.  I believe technique is the most important because the other areas only come into play if you have good technique.

Whilst there are many areas we could examine to make improvements, in my opinion the most crucial area that needs to be addressed by the Rebels is body height.  With body height it’s pretty simple – whoever gets lower (and stays lower), normally wins the scrum battle.  The key to body height is the hips – if you get your hips low (and keep them low), the rest follows.

The loosehead’s job is to get his head onto the sternum of the tight head prop and then drive slightly upwards.  To do that the loosehead has to get lower than the opposition tighthead on engagement. 

The tighthead’s job it is to nullify the loosehead by trying to use his right shoulder to keep the loosehead under control by not allowing him to get his head onto the tighthead’s sternum and then drive upwards.  To do this the tighthead must stay low and drive straight through maintaining lower body height than the opposition loosehead.

The following video shows examples of good and bad technique.

I could show you many more clips with good and bad examples of technique where body height wins the day but the important points are that you start low, you drive your hips forward which lowers the hips and knees so you’re in a low position at the engagement and then you have to keep your hips down as you drive forward.

That is not what Henderson or Blake are doing at the Rebels and until their technique is addressed in this area, the Rebels scrum will continue to struggle.  Let’s have a look at how they performed in the games against the Blues and Brumbies. 

Whilst I’ve focussed on the Rebels in this analysis there are plenty of other props who have similar technique issues and not just in Australia.  With Weeks injured and Somerville retired the Rebels are really struggling at scrum time.  No doubt they’ll be working hard with Ben Darwin and Matt Cockbain and hopefully that work is focussed on their technique.

Discussion

  • Lindommer

    Don’t understand Swahili, Scott, could you please explain your theories in plain English in future.

  • Garry

    At first glance (real time), it looks like there is not much assistance coming from Weeks second row partner, but in slow mo, it’s his body position and the miss of the hit. But I still feel that his second row partner must work more on their combination/timing. Having replacements during the match wouldn’t be helping.

    • Scott Allen

      Garry – agree with your thoughts on the importance of the second rowers – in fact the work of the entire middle row is important but only so much I can cover in one post.

  • chasmac

    Good analysis Scott.
    I’m dissapointed to see Kepu in the video, I had bigger wraps on him than that. From what season is Kepu’s scrum taken?
    Also.. how goood are the Kiwi props. Even when they lose the hit, they still manage to get back into shape rather than collapse like the Aussies ( Alexander, Kepu ).
    Serious question; Do you think that Whitelocks actions in the 2nd video were deliberate? If so, this highlights some seriously good coaching IMO. Upon looking at it for the second time it certainly seems deliberate.. I’m impressed.

    • Scott Allen

      On Kepu – that’s from the RWC semi-final last year. I use clips of Kepu to show my players what not to do – his technique is not great, particularly at loosehead. He is better when at tighthead but not great.

      The Kiwi props are fantastic – you can learn an awful lot watching them and if you search the Internet for videos with Mike Cron coaching the All Black scrum you’ll learn even more.

      I have no doubt that the tactic of the flankers slipping up is deliberate – it happens often.

      • mania

        kepu’s a good scrummager in general but like the rest of the aus front row tend to forget their brains and balls in the changing sheds when it comes to the AB’s.
        awesome vid analysis.
        the hit is pretty important but if u miss it then you have other techniques to recover. missing a hit for me meant that i’d have to dig in and wait. mistake the aus front rows make is they step back losing momentum and making the situation worse. at that stage you should just dig your feet in and wait until the pressure eases and hope your front row partners feel the ease of pressure and push then.
        i love the skull dugery of the scrums

        • Muffy

          I agree with loving scrum time skullduggery….but I hate boring in, its in the same catagory as bag snatching, the crime of the lazy.

          I like seeing body position and timing winning the scrum, thats more like art heists, planing and brains…

        • mania

          muffy – what gets me is boring in is the perfect opportunity to dominate your man. should someone be angling in at an angle it means that you have the advantage to push in a straight line as they’re no longer opposing your force and trying to upset the scrum. its when you try to counter the boring that your falling for it, instead they should be pushing straight. scrum will still collaspe but you’d have the dominance and it should bring more attention to the fact your opposite is angling in

  • yourmatesam

    Great article as usual Scott, keep up the good work!

  • Antony

    Really great article, thanks for putting that together.

    I’d never realised before what a beast Woodcock is.

    • mania

      anthony – thats why woodcocks considered the best in the world. also why even tho blues are failing dismally the scrums are still domninating.
      its funny you should say that “I’d never realised before what a beast Woodcock is.” most fans would never know how good woodcock is and this led to one year an aussie (i think he was aus) commentator saying that woodcocks worth was a myth. he never realised either woodcocks dominance. woodcock just laughed it off but the aus scrum that year was demolished consistently.
      the media have a lot to answer for

      • JJJ

        I dunno about that. As good as it looks when it works, if he’d missed his bind against Franks he would’ve been straight down into the ground. Given how often he misses that shirt-grab at international level and settles for an arm instead it’s no surprise that Aussies think Woodcock is responsible for collapsing scrums our tighthead gets blamed for. Hence the “myth” tag.

  • Patrick

    Hope the rebels watch this :(

  • bill

    what about the second rows? if ur saying everyone needs body alignment i can clearly see the difference between the all blacks and wallaby scrums without even clicking the video.

    • bill

      In that case the wallabies front row actually has a better position than the abs, but their second row are giving it up by their position whereas the abs presumably have more effective alignment within their tight five.

  • suckerforred

    Hey Scott, you didn’t apply for a position with the Dingo Pack?

  • Nutta

    Scott

    Grand work. Really great stuff not only from a historical “what happened” perspective, but more-so from a coaching/knowledge perspective so that the uninitiated can get a starting idea on what is going on up there. From that 2nd instructional/coaching perspective I am looking forward to further installments covering off the impact of locks binding and positioning and then a 3rd looking at the same for backrow

    Small steps to begin to rebuild some slight general knowledge base in the scrum in a land over-run with mungo and AFL ignorance

    Every now and again I do some mentoring/coaching for young/colts fronties coming through the club (if they have the brains & will to want to learn…different subject that…). This goes into into the library for future use and instruction. I owe you a beer or three for that.

    Gawd help me if we ever did mauling… I guess the footage would be black & white…

    • Patrick

      The Rebels actually mauled really effectively against NSW last weekend a couple of times.

  • Pingback: Scrum Analysis: The Importance Of The Middle Row - Green and Gold Rugby

  • Pingback: Scrum Analysis: Working As A Pack - Green and Gold Rugby

Close