Player Ratings: Wallabies v. Wales Second Test

Stuart Fazakerley June 18, 2012 68

No GravatarToday’s back page of the local rag, the Herald Sun, said all that needed to be said about last night’s Melbourne Test. ‘Wallabies Over Wales. WOW’. In front of 33,888 at Etihad Stadium, the Wallabies retained the James Bevan Trophy, but the Welsh won plenty of fans with their enterprising and clever play.

It was the kind of game that lives in the memory not for the technical skills on display (there were errors a-go-go from both sides all through the game), not even for a career-defining performance or a single moment of brilliance (though it had both). From start to finish, it was just a brilliant contest, complete with running rugby, tight defence, and a shoot-out to boot.

It was the kind of game you needed a cigarette after. The kind of game that could sell this fine city on this incredible sport.

Player Ratings vs Wales

Player Rating Comments
Benn Robinson 6 Only played for about an hour, was serviceable without setting the world on fire. Scrums seemed a lot better in the first half of the game compared to last week. Replaced by Ben Alexander in the 65th.
Tatafu Polota-Nau 8 Refused to go for the business mullet look this week, no doubt affected by the ravaging derision in GAGR’s First Test PlayUp forum. With the ‘fro flowing in the wind-free Etihad Stadium, he improved on last week, getting a solid 8 runs in for 31 metres, over his 50 minutes. Replaced by Stephen Moore in the 50th.
Sekope Kepu 8 Had an excellent defensive game, running out the full 80+ and making 8 tackles. Was great in scrums and ever-present in the contest.
Rob Simmons 6 Improved on a rough game last week, but still leaves himself too open at the contest – he got smacked around a lot in rucks and mauls. 7 tackles is nothing to scoff at, though, hopefully he continues to improve. Replaced by Michael Hooper in the 69th.
Nathan Sharpe 8 It’s amazing to think Sharpey didn’t think he’d be selected, after announcing he’d retire at the end of the year. It’s even more amazing that he’s in the form he’s in with the finish line in sight. Played all game, making 36 metres from his 11 runs. He was at more rucks than anyone else on the field, and has not lost his skill of eking out metres where nobody else can. Supreme.
Scott Higginbotham 7 Higgers started well, his flowing, questionable mane eagerly attacking contests around his new home. He was mixed with the ball in hand, however, turning it over three times. Played the whole game.
David Pocock(c) 9 Ten tackles. Eleven rucks. An average of just under 5 metres gained whenever he had the ball. We are not worthy.
Wycliff Palu 7 Had the ball often enough, and always found a way into the contest. He led the tackle count with eleven, but also topped the missed tackle count with three. Still, Australia could use more players who carry his influence around the ground. Replaced by Dave Dennis at 54 minutes.
Will Genia 7 Willy G had a serviceable night, not matching his heroics in Brisbane but still getting the job done. Still kicks it away far too easily, but was saved by the Welsh doing the same thing.
Berrick Barnes 9 Sweet Lord. This man had a child yesterday, flew straight to the game, and, worst of all, had to rely on a Melbourne cabbie to get him to the stadium on time. You wouldn’t blame him for having an off night, but, no doubt exhausted already, turns on one for the ages. Seventy-six metres gained, five tackles, a line-break, a try assist and 17 points. This was a performance they will still be talking about when Archie is all grown up. Replaced in the 73rd by Mike Harris. G&GR Man of the Match.
Digby Ioane 7 Notching up 10 runs for 74 metres with a line-break, Digby was his enigmatic self. For a winger, though, he’s really not a fan of staying on the wing. Two turn-overs.
Pat McCabe 6 A good game without being great for McCabe. Five tackles, and five runs with the ball.
Rob Horne 8 The try-scorer had a very good game. 72 metres gained from six runs, with seven tackles to boot. Always seems to be in the right place at the right time.
Cooper Vuna 4 Poor Coop. He looks so good with ball in hand, but is still too intimidated to get himself into the contest. Maybe we’ve been too spoiled by inside runners like Ioane. His yellow card for a silly attack on Halfpenny was the cherry on top of a forgettable homecoming for the Rebel. Replaced by Anthony Fainga’a in the 69th.
Adam Ashley-Cooper 6 Had an alright night down back. Got the ball 8 times for 53 metres, three tackles and one missed. Could have done more late in the game.
Stephen Moore 5 32 minutes, 1 tackle. Never really got into the contest.
Ben Alexander 7 Got 2 runs with the ball for 12 metres, not bad for a prop in 17 minutes. Not bad for a prop in general, really.
Dave Dennis 5 28 minutes for 2 touches and 9 metres gained.
Michael Hooper 4 Played 13 minutes, costing two crucial turnovers, including one in the 79th that almost cost the Wallabies the game. Sometimes it’s just not your night.
Nic White - Did not play.
Anthony Faingaa 6 Had one good run, getting 17 metres. Need him to have a bigger impact off the bench.
Mike Harris 9 One for every minute he played, yes, but as LeBron James would couldn’t tell you, the great players are the ones that can deliver in clutch moments. Mikey Mike stepped up after the siren, following up one of the great #10 performances in Berrick Barnes, and never looked like missing.

The patented G&GR ratings guide:

10 – A legendary performance to go down in the history books
9 – Outstanding performance: Man of the Match shoo-in
8 – Excellent all-round game
7 – Good game with a few sparkles
6 – Solid performance
5 – Average – ho hum
4 – Below par
3 – Had a bad game
2 – Tell your story walking pal
1 – A complete joke

Discussion »

  • Ben

    7 for Ben Alexander was a bit optimistic. With two notable exceptions (leading up to Barnes’ missed penalty) the Wallaby scrum was in a bit of strife once he came on.

    Also not sure I like the dedication to stats. Yes Rob Horne made 72 metres, but 30 of those were an open run to the line. That’s not to say he didn’t play well – he was solid throughout – but stick to lies and damned lies rather than statistics!

    • Robson

      I could’t give Alexander a 7 either. He is a prop first and foremost and his inability to hold up in the first scrum he set down just about gifted the game to the Welsh. His pre engagement stance for a loosehead prop is too high in the hips and his feet aren’t well positioned either. Forget about the runs and metres he made, he gave away a crucial scrum penalty and that doesn’t deserve a 7.

      • Stuart Fazakerley

        Fair points all. I was at the game and at the wrong end of the ground to see the scrum penalty, so was not aware of his full implication in it.

        Maybe I subconsciously like to look after the props more :P

      • Nutta

        When discusing the merits of props and hookers I have said it before and I’ll say it again…

        “Scrum is meat. Lineout is potatoes. Everything else is gravy. And you don’t put fkn gravy on the plate first Boy”

        Less then 2min on the field and the FBR (Fat Back Rower) damn near cost us a test…

        • Nutta

          Sorry, whilst on it, I thought Keps was v.sound and devloping into a great tighthead. Hips and shoulders square, good balance on the outside shoulder, channeled the push of both lock and flanker nicely. 8 is good and fair.

          6 for Fat Cat was a wee bit harsh. Don’t forget he was scrumming against possibly the best TH in the world (either him or that Dago Castrogiavano) so he would not have an around-the-ground impact after wrestling with him for an hour.

        • Stuart Fazakerley

          I do love that saying.

        • James

          Damn straight, was thinking of your previous post on that matter when reading the ratings. Hits the nail right on the head.

          On the whole the ratings look pretty good. Just Alexander > Robinson doesnt make sense and Rob Horne a bit high. Unless he gets bonus points whenever he doesn’t butcher a try, then its fine.

  • Jonathan

    The rankings seem a little too optimistic. I doubt Horne and Sharpe did that much to warrant an 8.

    • Stuart Fazakerley

      I disagree, especially regarding Sharpe. His work at the breakdown is still crucial to a Wallaby success, and, I believe, to our win on Saturday.

    • Garry

      And Horne’s rating is high. He still hasn’t shown us the ability to put his wingers into space. He is a solid runner into contact, but hasn’t broken many tackles at international level.

      I agree with OP. His run stats are inflated due to his try.

    • TimB

      I thought Sharpe was again a workhorse. His work rate was very high with 7 tackles, 11 runs and 12 rucks/mauls. That’s compared to 10 tackles, 10 runs and 10 rucks/mauls for Pocock who is considered one of the best 7s going around. He also needs to get credit for the rolling maul that set up the final penalty.

      • Brax

        Fainga’a also deserves a mention in the rolling maul, he came rushing in out of nowhere & gave them an extra shove when it started to get a bit static. He also had a great run leading up to a good position to attack before Hooper dropped his first ball & his defense, as usual, is attack. I’m not suggesting his rating is wrong but the assertion that he needs to make more of an impact is very wide of the mark!

    • http://www.andrewmosey.com Moses

      Good ratings Stu – for those questioning if Horne deserved an 8, check the ratings guide below the post 8 means an “Excellent all-round game”

    • Barbarian

      Nah Horne is definitely an 8. Made good metres every time he touched the ball, and pulled off some crucial tackles. 8 tackles for 0 misses is a great effort for an OC.

    • Alan

      nonsense, Sharpie was immense (as ever) He is so far ahead of all our other locks im terrified and sad to think his retirement is so close. Deans and the ARU should be doing everything possible to convince him to stay at least one more year

  • Fin

    Berricks last couple of games makes selection for the RC very interesting. QC, Beale, JOC and Barnes. IMO 2 make the 15, 1 makes the bench and 1 misses out. Any thoughts?

    • Lee Enfield

      With all hands on deck, I think the backline will look something like this;

      9. Genia
      10. Cooper
      11. Ioane
      12. Barnes
      13. AAC
      14. O’Connor
      15. Beale

      20. White/Phipps
      21. Harris/McCabe
      22. Mitchell

      • Mart

        Now that’s a solid backline.

        Although i do think McCabe has done enough to hold onto starting 12.

        • suckerforred

          I think it is going to depend on whether or not the wallabies will have the audacity to run with two play makers. I like the idea, therefore I would put Barnes in over the other availables at 12 with Cooper at 10. Provided Cooper can show us some form over the remaining SR games.

      • Drop Kick

        By the time the RC starts Cooper will have played 4.5 Super 15 matches since his disastrous World Cup campaign.

        O’Connor will have played two matches in the last 3/4 months.

        Neither should be in the starting side, both should earn their places from the bench.

  • Garry

    I too saw Beale on the bench in a cut away shot, and assumed he was sitting on the pine. When Sookface limped off and Harris ran on (not Beale), I groaned. It felt like the wind knocked out of me. I thought you’ve done it to us again Dingo.

    But who else other than Harris would you want to kick a goal to win? Was it genius that I’m not giving Deans credit for?

    No. Later I realised that Harris was the only flyhalf on the bench.

  • Pedro

    I thought Mccabe and Horne had similar games, good defense and either one could have finished that try.

    Also think 7 is a bit much for Alexander, but he was in the scrum that Wales got penalised for, so he wasn’t hopeless at scrum time. Considering they generally aren’t playing with two locks by the time he’s on.

    • wiggety

      My grandma could have finished that try

      • Dave

        Does Deans know?

  • Willus

    I thought Faingaa deserved a 7, his only run beat 4 defenders when he first touched the ball in the 73rd minute. Then as soon as he entered the maul it started to gain some go forward in the 80th.

    • Stuart Fazakerley

      Fair call, he did do quite well, but for 11 minutes the difference between a 6 and a 7 is negligible.

      I would still like him to have more impact off the bench, if only because I think he is capable of more.

  • Duckman

    Though A. Fainga’a deserves a mention for his contribution to the last maul. Going nowhere until he sprinted in and helped get it at least another 10m closer to the posts. Not that Harris couldn’t have kicked it from further out.

  • Jez

    A prop’s primary responsibility is to win scrums. Alexander struggled in this area and so should have got a 5 at the very most

  • Mart

    Give Alexander, Simmons and Vuna a spell.

    Time for someone else to step up.

    Fardy. Slipper/ Palmer. (A may have these positions wrong)

    AAC to wing Beale to fullback

  • Footy44

    Just reading press this morn and thought Deans should get more of a wrap. That was most structured display I have seen from Wallabies for a while in – they looked like a Mckenzie coached team. Building multiple phases and then not throwing speculation passes or kicking it away (too much) when getting shut down – rather setting it up to start again. Forwards looked to break advantage line and then gave the backs good ball. Admittedly not our slickest backline with three notable stars out, which may be why all that possession not converted to points out but barnes had a good passing and running game.

  • Footy44

    From wayne smith in the Australian
    “The thrilling finale can’t be allowed to blot out or excuse the tedious rugby that preceded it. Little creativity was displayed by the Wallabies, just a dutiful determination to stick to the apparent game plan of playing bash rugby”

    - Looked to me tothat the wallabies had the exact game plan of reds last year -play ball in hand which requires some hard forward play (bash rugby as Wayne put it) to set up good ball for backs. Much prefer the weekends style of play than kicking for field position.

    • Stuart Fazakerley

      Agreed. Like I said, it wasn’t technically brilliant or flashy, but it was the smartest rugby I have seen the Wallabies play for some time.

  • http://www.myspace.com/kamerunga Tony Hillier

    Bit hard on A.A-C — he was as steady as the proverbial rock at fullback, especially under the high ball.

    • Stuart Fazakerley

      6 = solid. I thought he was solid. He doesn’t have the Beale-esque influence on the game at 15, but does his job.

  • Dave

    It is criminal that you have Horne rated ahead of Ioane. Barnes and Ioane were the best backs on the day by a mile. Replace Horne with Faingaa and nothing would change at all. Replace Digby with the next best winger and Australia is a much worse team. Also no wonder Digby comes off the wing, with McCabe and Horne in the centers its not like anyone is going to pass the ball to him if he’s waiting on the sideline.

  • Searsy

    What I thought was a real improvement over the last couple of games has been the timing of support players hitting the ruck. Timing your run for support of a player is not always a simple as it seems as you are never quite sure when the ball is coming out from the scrum half. It really gives you confidence when you see them going multiple phases.
    High balls seem to be a real area of weakness in the back three (well at least 2 of the back 3). I wonder if there needs to be more communication from players returning to support the catcher about how much space they have. Jumping into a catch when there is no pressure from tacklers seems crazy to me. As freakish as Digby is, I know one day one of his Wendell Sailor style chest bounces is going to cost us dearly.

    • Simon

      High balls and restarts! The ABs know how to regather at the restart; I think this is a real weakness in the wallaby game and worry we will get exposed in RC. Great win though fellas!

  • Baldwid

    i would like to float an idea – radical but I think worth consideration!!

    I reckon Australia has potentially the best team in world rugby but that wont materialise until we get our selections right. I think man for man we have better players than every team in the game bar the AB’s who I think we match up with dead even. (This is more directed to the backs – who i think are not picked as a unit so i will only discuss them – the pack on the weekend would be my pick with the inclusion of Horwill at Simmons expense.

    If i was to pick a team tomorrow – disregarding fitenss – I would select:

    9. Genia
    10. Cooper
    11. Ioane
    12. Barnes
    13. Tomane
    14. Mitchell
    15. Beale

    20. White
    21. O’Connor
    22. AAC

    I know that people are going to laugh about my backline but my reasoning is that we need Barnes somewhere to slot dropgoals and plug the corners when its wet and windy – cooper is not accomplished enough to slot drop’s on both feet and his kicking can be a bit hit and miss, but his attack and organisation of the attack is TOO GOOD to exclude. Plus i think at 12 Barnes actually gives the backline plenty of organisation (O’Connor is to much of a self man – see the way the Rebels have played in his absence from the playmaking roles). I know people will be screaming about Tomane at 13 but he is the best prospect for 13 we have had since Morty!!! Horne offers nothing and is selfish – sharked AAC in Brissy. McCabe is good but to 1D. I know AAC never plays a bad game in the gold jersey but he is not a natural 13 – just cause he can play there does not mean he is a natural and our wingers don’t get the ball enough with him their – same issue with Horne. Ant – solid trier and i love him but not ahead of the others.

    The reason for Tomane is his size (102 KG and 192 cm),strength, speed and skill. He is the closest thing we have to Jamie Roberts or SBW in the centres and I think he is considerably faster and equally as skilful as SBW. He can break a tackle – fark can he break them – and he played centres in League. His Defence is awesome – Case Closed in my book.

    I know leaving O’Connor out might seem crazy to some but he would provide mad impact late in the game and cut tired teams to shreds!!! I still think that Mitchell is our best winger – before he was injured he was almost universally rated the best or close to best in the game, even Kiwi commentators said that which is quite a compliment given the have jane, gear, guildford, ranger etc. plus i also think JOC is still a bit of a prat and think some time on the pine might serve him well.

    I just think that backline has smarts, skill, speed, strength and most importantly BALANCE – the centres compliment eachother, as do the back 3 and the halves pick themselves. I honestly cant see a backline in the game better than that. Sure England and Wales have individual stars – Tuilagi and Roberts but overall cant match that. The only team that can is the AB’s and i would bar up if that backline ran out against the AB’s in the Rugby Championship – any thoughts???

    • Patrick

      I think that would be a really good line-up.

    • suckerforred

      You’re right Balwid I am going to question Tomane being in the centres. Having said that I have never seen him play there.

      I think you would be better off with any of O’Connor, Taps, AAC, or even McCabe in the run on when you have Berrick in at 12, with Tomane on the bench.

      Just imagine haveing all of Cooper, Barnes, O’Connor & Beale on the park at once. The oposition would have exactly no idea who they should cover and instead of putting two defenders on Ioane they would only put one and he make even more breaks. I am feeling very happy just thinking about it. ;)

      • Baldwid

        suckerforred – you are right having all those guys on at once would be confusing but I get the feeling that it might even confuse us, not just the opposition. Having too many chiefs and not enough indians could be a real problem. Too much direction from everyone and everywhere and suddenly their is not clarity as dingo would say. Plus i think that having them all in the back-line makes for a very small bunch. Not to say they would not be awesome – i agree it does make me happy but i think that we have been missing an x-factor/game breaking centre – at either 12 or 13 for some time. JOC is not the solution for me – far too selfish and not a natural ball player. Bob Dwyer said it once in a podcast and its something i have always thought – its no good having players in the 10/12 positions whose first instincts are to back themselves, their go must be to feed the back-line and i think JOC has incredible skills and can do it no doubt, just think its not his natural go. He said that Campo asked him once to play at 10 and his response was to ask the centres whether they would like him their considering they are getting the ball after he does whatever crazy shit he does with it – not saying it cant work, just my hunch that it probably wont. i think BB is a must so i think we need a 13 who is x factor / game breaker like Morty who can just shred tackles / beat defenders / get us over the ad line almost without fail. I cant think of any 13 in Australia who can do that – even though AAC has done a solid job in the past. Thats how i got to Tomane – plus i reckon he is f*$king awesome!!!

        either way suckerforred – having a healthy backline – no matter which way selections fall (unless we are still lumped with horne and mccabe) will make for an exciting Rugby Championship!!!

        • James

          dude, shorten your comments. i dont have the attention span to read the lot.

          Why not Ioane at 13 if your looking for a shredder, he’s played there before and proven. then you can leave the object of your bromance on the wing.

          I prefer Ioane at 13. Although his passing game is comparable to Horne and McCabe. It also covers his weaknesses (high ball and no kicking) better than being in the back 3, while playing to his strengths – running over the top of people.

  • RJ

    Dont understand these ratings. If Harris missed the kick at the end, everyone would be lower even though they didnt play diferently

    • Footy44

      If you can find it have a read of Ewen Mckenzie article after the reds beat the tahs earlier in season in last minute. Just because points scored in last minute of game doesn’t make it lucky – still requires team to get in scoring position and its an 80min game.
      So I gues question is not re Harris kick but do the individuals deserve higher ratings if the team wins. I say yes.

    • Stuart Fazakerley

      Not sure why you think that.

      Sure, Harris’ would have bombed, but I was pretty satisfied with how most of the Wallabies played in what was a great battle.

      I can only think that I would have savaged Hooper more if his turnovers had ended up costing us the game.

    • Dave

      It was a solid performance from the WBs. Not great, but solid. We dominated for the most part. Our line penetration (and Wales’ defence) was the only thing that let us down. Regardless of Harris’ kick going over I don’t imagine Wales could look at their actual performance with any great satisfaction. They were clearly on the back foot for the majority of the game.

  • vidiot

    Ah, but they all helped Harris kick, cos they all would have loved him no matter what happens.

  • Dally M

    Did Vuna really attack Halfpenny?

    It looked to me like he arrived too late to jump for the ball, but too early to make the tackle and ended up under Halfpenny when he came down on top of him & then grabbed his foot as he was falling to try and break his fall.

    I only saw it on Saturday night, and while it looked bad, it didn’t look there was any intent etc.

    • Nabley

      It is a rubbish law, especially when we see AFL players doing it every week with no bad impact.

      • Dally M

        I don’t know about no bad impact.

        There are plenty of injuries & concussions as a result of players falling from that height & hitting the ground + the potential for serious injury is there.

        Just watched a replay & it looks like Vuna is trying to push the other Welch player away & then braces for impact with Halfpenny which could be, and probably was, interpreted as him trying to take him out with his shoulder.

      • Drop Kick

        My son broke his collarbone two weeks ago playing AFL for school from an incident like this. So plenty of impact for him!(especially as he was supposed to be playing in the NSW Rugby State Championships last weekend and had been asked to trial for Lloyd McDermont indigenous team

        • Nabley

          Touche

        • Brax

          Hope he learned his lesson to keep away from that bastard of a sport.

        • Drop kick

          Yes Brax he has leant a lesson. He better have or he won’t be get dinner!

  • Nabley

    You have underscored Sharpe. A really outstanding game every bit as good as Pococks or Barnes. Gee he is going to leave a hole when he goes.

  • robbo

    Kepu was a nine – had a great all round game and if he not made two of his tackles there was no other cover and all the discussion to date would be academic.

    From the stands the second half was not great to watch – endless stoppages, Genia dwelling on the ball (and then playing to a 5 m wide blindside), endless penalties. It looked better on TV (maybe because it was easier to get a drink!). I look forward to the new 5 second rule when the ball is at the back of ruck next year – it will be the single greatest improvement to speeding the game up I reckon – realignment with speed will win games.

    • Patrick

      Realignment with speed already wins games, what do you think the ABs do? Sure they have a lot of dirty enough tricks and the like but they sure do re-align fast and well, all day.

      A lot of teams just haven’t got the memo yet.

  • Garry

    Pocock only 10 tackles? That’s below his par, pointing towards good support from our other piggies. NZ worked out how to counter Pocock was to make him tackle, thus reducing his chance to pilfer. Wales haven’t cottoned on yet.

    Great work WB forwards for standing up as a group.

    • Dave

      Not sure of the stats but I think this might have something to do with possession. Wales didn’t have the ball enough did they?

  • robbo

    Vuna has got away with it – compelling reasons apparently – available for selection next week. Third time lucky?

    • Robson

      Well there is one very compelling reason why he shouldn’t be selected. His overall defensive skills level need a huge amount of refinement before he can be considered a genuine international prospect; especially on the wing where he plays.

  • rossco

    so after 12 years or so of trying to “sell” Rugby to Melburnians, the Wallabies can’t fill a stadium against the 6 Nations champs ?

    Wouldn’t the ARU just be better off sticking to Sydney and Brisbane and playing in full stadiums ?

    • murph

      What?? And deny ARU officials/sponsors a jolly in Melbourne???!

    • Dave

      It was pretty disappointing wasn’t it? Especially since that game was not only against the 6N champs but a series decider and a trophy that’s no easy win.

  • murph

    Way OTT with the ratings. If Harris missed that kick you’d have everyone 2 points lower.

    Horne an 8? Are you kidding? He barely passed the ball the entire game and repeatedly ran into Digby’s space in attack.

    BA was awful. Slipper or Holmes should be brought in to replace him.

    Higginbotham was a 6 at most. His turnovers were useful but he was missing in defence.

    Ant F made an instant impact when he came on with *at least* one good tackle and *at least* one excellent run. 6 is harsh when in comparison to Horne and McCabe.

  • Mark

    Cooper Vuna (CV) was the victim of a stupid kick from Genia. Why the hell he opted to kick is anybody’s guess as he was actually giving the ball back to the welsh instead of unleashing his backline and retaining possession. Video replay shows that the welsh player just landed on CV without being tackled. CV only attempted to wrap his hands around the welsh player tto save him from an awkward fall.

    • murph

      Are you Vuna’s agent or something?

  • Mark

    Not at all mate! I am simply highlighting my views on the incident which led to CV being yelow carded which ultimately had impacted on his ratings when infact he did nothing wrong. He never ignored the welsh player when he was coming out whcih just goes to show he never intended to endanger the players life. I think most people have been jumping to conclusion but have a closer look at the incident and you will find that the player landed on CV.

Close