Wallabies vs All Blacks second Bledisloe player ratings

Matt Rowley August 3, 2008 6

No GravatarAlways torture doing ratings on a thumping, but here goes.

15 Adam Ashley-Cooper Looked solid at the back until went off with busted hand, even made a tackle after his injury. 5

14 Peter Hynes - Provided two of the rare running highlights 7

13 Stirling Mortlock (C), Trademark bust through Smith to make the only Wallaby try. Some good cover tackling as well 5

12 Berrick Barnes, Neither his defence nor his kicking lived up to recent performances 4

11 Lote Tuqiri, little ball and little opportunity to get involved 5

10 Matt Giteau, Considering what was going on around him, still had plenty of spark and skill. Some decent kicking as well. 7

9 Luke Burgess, needs to try to do less. 4

8 Wycliff Palu, found it a lot harder to make any yards this week. A couple of decent runs and tackles though. 5

7 George Smith, despite the usual a grad defence got frustrated with Lawrences ruling of the breakdown leading to a few too many penalties. 5

6 Phil Waugh, don’t think he ever recovered from the head knock early on 4

5 Nathan Sharpe, gotta take some responsibility for the line-out calling 3

4 James Horwill, also went quiet apart from the nice shot on So’aiolo 4

3 Al Baxter, I think it was lucky we didn’t have more scrums on our own ball 4

2 Stephen Moore, his throwing wasn’t so bad and made a couple of good runs. 5

1 Benn Robinson, also below par 4

Replacements:
16 Tatafu Polota-Nau, – a very forgettable night for TPN. A couple of tackles and runs stopped him from getting less 2
17 Matt Dunning,
18 Dan Vickerman, – needs to play from the start, not as a replacement
19 Hugh McMeniman – made some impact when he came on. 6
20 Sam Cordingley,
21 Ryan Cross,
22 Drew Mitchell – shmoo coming on highlighted the strength that AAC brings at the back 5

Rating system:
10 – A legendary performance to go down in the history books
9 – Man of the match worthy performance
8 – Outstanding
7 – Good game, great in parts
6 – Solid performance
5 – Average – ho hum
4 – Below par
3 – Had a bad game
2 – Tell your story walking pal
1 – A complete joke.

Discussion »

  • Patrick

    Really, Vicks does need to start, Phil Waugh doesn’t (we urgently needed McMeniman’s ball-carrying and aggression, or better yet Rocky’s).

    I thought that overall it was just a mental collapse – I have to blame Smith, Mortlock, Giteau and Sharpe the most, since they are supposed to be the leaders of the team.

    But specifically it was probably the breakdown that cost us the most and the only real elements to identify here are that we only need one open-side but we do need Elsom (or McMeniman).

    So now we know why Connolly didn’t like Smith/Waugh!

  • Leg Break

    Patrick,

    Playing Smith and Waugh can work, but you need a decent performance from the tight 5 first. And on Saturday, your tight forwards were asleep for most of the time. I’m picking that they’ll get the chance to watch replays of both Woodcock tries several times over during the next few weeks.

    And what were 2 of your backs doing buying a dummy sold by Nonu 5 metres out? They’ll be skiing in hell before Nonu ever passes in that situation.

  • Patrick

    Fair points, leg break. No argument.

  • Anonymous

    TPN was simply horrible. I would have had the number 9 start throwing the ball in after the 5th lineout loss.

    vickerman will help, but i am still at a loss as to how the wallabies could go from a comfortable 15 point win to a 29 point thrashing in a week.

  • Pedro

    I think Waugh was unlucky to get a knock early on, I don’t think that performance means that smith and waugh can’t play together.

    Overall we got housed, out played by a better opposition. We got shafted by the ref with two short line out throws though. Ours definitely went 5 metres, the ref was right there. The NZ throw looked pretty close but the ref decided to stand at the back of the lineout for that one. One of these resulted in a try for NZ, the other stopped us getting the ball in a similar position.

    Although our scrummaging was inferior I thought baxter’s side was pulled down by NZ at least once. Look at the angle’s of their backs. This doesn’t mean I want to hear him whinge about how refs have it in for him again though.

    Burgess needs to get more clean ball to the ten, until this happens consistently he will be under pressure for his spot. In Sydney we proved our back line only needs minimal possession to score points.

    At the start of the tri-nations we would have said that (if any) this test was the one we could afford to lose. Beating SA and NZ at our home was a good start, lets pray (performance wise at least) this game was only a blip on the radar.

    ps Gerrard/Barnes for FB?

  • Anonymous

    Well yep i put it down to the tight five playing like a bunch of bullies on the school yard. Richie and has fellow loosies were far more superior at the breakdown allowing a lot of turnover ball.

    That led into Carter and Cowan plugging the corners never letting the aussies get on the front foot playing inside there half for long periods at a time.

Close