Wallaby Hooker of the Decade

Noddy December 17, 2009 42

No Gravatar

JP

Warning! Big call coming up.

Ok, some folk have suggested there are too many ‘givens’ in this series. Larkham. Gregan. Kefu.  So what about this one? I reckon it’s pretty damn difficult to come up with the best hooker of the decade.  I tell you what, it was hard enough to come up with the top three.  And I know I will cop some flak for some of the decisions made. Well one of them.

Looking past that for the time being, there is some very decent quality in this list. The four at the top of the caps list all have strong claims for the title, but there is quality further down as well. Adam Freier’s career would have benefited from a prolonged run in the starting team enabling him to feel comfortable with his position, as opposed to the once off tests which must have put him under immense pressure. Meanwhile Tatafu Polota-Nau has shown in his limited starts that he is odds on favourite to take this title in ten years time.

So to the list, in which we have only seven names. Seven players who have started at hooker for Australia this decade. They were:

Stephen Moore (34), Jeremy Paul (28), Brendan Cannon (25), Michael Foley (20), Adam Freier (6), Tai McIsaacs (6),Tatafu Polota-Nau (4).

As we have all series, G&GR have come up with a top three. There is probably one glaring omission, but that’s likely when you have a quality top four.  The top three are:

SM

Stephen Moore


Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore has been identified as a future Wallaby hooker ever since his Reds debut back in 2003.  The 110 kg plus hooker, with impressive mobility and skills, was seen as the heir apparent to Phil Kearns, one of our greatest Wallaby hookers of all time.

It wasn’t until 2005 that Moore would break into the Wallabies team, debuting alongside the likes of Hugh McMeniman and Rocky Elsom in a 74-7 smashing of Samoa. He spent the year in an out of the Wallaby squad, mostly playing behind Jeremy Paul and Brendan Cannon, or sharing bench duties with Adam Freier and Tatafu Polota-Nau.

Moore’s run on debut would not come to the very last test of 2006, when he stared, and scored a try, against Scotland at Murrayfield.  The next year, a World Cup year, he would become the Wallabies’ first choice hooker starting in all but a few tests.  His career reached its pinnacle, so far at least, in 2008 when he lead a dominant scrum performance against Australia’s arch nemisis, England.  Moore would be named Man of the Match and started to receive the acclaim that he was the premier hooker in the game!

This year, Moore has not been of the same level for Moore. He shared the hooking position with Polota-Nau, in fact giving up his starting jersey to Tatafu at the end of the Tri-Nations. But come the Spring tour Moore reclaimed the 2 jersey and wouldn’t relinquish it again. In top form Moore is a strong scrummager, a damaging runner and a legitimate team leader.

Cano

Brendan Cannon


Brendan Cannon

Brendan Cannon is as tough a player as they come.  Surviving a being hit by a truck is proof of this, but watching his play was all the evidence you need. Cannon was yet another tight forward to debut in the 2001 Lions Series, coming into the squad after Jeremy Paul was injured in the first test. A few more appearances off the bench that year, behind the experienced Michael Foley, was a great breeding ground for the relatively inexperienced rake.  In fact his form on the Spring Tour at the end of that 2001 season was exceptional and he was unlucky not to get a test start.

That opportunity would come early the next season in the second test against France, again after Paul was injured in the first test.  His next appearance on the field though would be a few tests later when, as a replacement, he shadowed an amazing George Smith break down field to grab the final pass and score in the corner to seemingly secure the Wallabies a rare, late, victory against the Springboks at Ellis Park. Perhaps the Wallabies lost focus, because just a minute or two later, Bok fullback Werner Greef would charge over to score to win the game for the Boks.

But 2003 would be some sort of watershed for Cannon. His Super 12 form for the Waratahs was tremendous.  Paul would still have the two jersey for the first few tests, before Cannon forced his way into the starting jersey against South Africa in the Republic.  And, other than one test against Namibia, Cannon would remain in the jersey for the year. Cannon brought a style of play the Wallabies hadn’t seen in the 2 jersey for some time. Full of aggressive and uncompromising running, physicality at the break down and set piece solidarity.  Come the end of the World Cup he was considered alongside his hero, Keith Wood, as the best hookers in the game.

The next few years would be a battle on the field for Cannon as he and Jeremy Paul competed for the starting jersey. This would continue up until his retirement from the game due to spinal injury, going out in relative anonymity against Italy in Rome in 2006.

Foles

Michael Foley


Michael Foley

Michael Foley was an unfashionable player who never seemed to get the acclaim he deserved. He started the 99 World Cup as, supposedly, third choice hooker. But when Phil Kearns went home injured, Foley leapt over Jeremy Paul and became an integral part of the winning side.

In 2000 he managed to hold on to both his form and jersey starting in every test, but come 2001 things had changed. Jeremy Paul was back in the starter’s jersey, but an injury in the first Lions test would see Foley called up for the rest of the year. He would retire in the last game of the year, against Wales in Cardiff, having received his 50th cap.

Foley was old school. I don’t know if he ever touched the ball in his Wallaby career outside of having to throw it into the lineout. Well, he scored a try against Spain in 2001, so he must have touched it at least once.  For it was his set piece that he was acclaimed.  His lineout throwing was impeccable and he led a scrum succeeded both with experienced props (Harry and Blades in 99) and rookies (Stiles and Moore in 01).

Axel has been one of those players, alongside Matt Cockbain, who never really got the recognition he deserved whilst playing, but once he left we struggled to find a suitable replacement.  In Foley we had someone who would get his job done.  He wouldn’t be standing out wide ready for the flashy runs, nor was he likely to ever put his boot to ball. He was a hardnosed pack leader who liked the fire and brimstone side of rugby. For him it was about getting a physical advantage over your opposition. If you did that, and if each of your team mates did it, then you were likely to end up ahead on the scoreboard as well.

*****

Ok. They are our hookers.  There is an elephant in the room which I guess I should refer to. Jeremy Paul.  He is mentioned constantly in this article, yet not as a leading candidate. In my eye, he never produced consistently at Wallaby level. 72 caps is an amazing statistic, but he only started in 34 tests.  In my opinion, despite his constant chances, he never made the Wallaby jersey his own either.  He had a great year in 2005, but again most of his acclaim was for his play in the loose, which was brilliant.  If he was able to combine this with the more traditional roles of the hooker, more often, he probably would have featured.

So what do you think? Am I made to exclude Paul? If so, who does he replace? Has Moore done enough at this level yet to have made the grade? Was Cannon just a flash in the pan? Does Foley’s short span work against him? Let us know in the poll and in the comments who the best hooker of the decade was.

[poll id="57"]

Discussion »

  • Shane Sullivan

    I went with Foley. I like an old school Hooker! That just sounds all wrong I know, but want can you do. Canon was a close second.

    • http://FatPaddler.com Sean Smith – Fat Paddler

      Couldn’t have put it better myself. Both old-school grizzled bastards who never took a backwards step. I found it hard to split them, but went with Foley in the end.

  • Pedro

    I think you are made to exclude Paul, I agree the category is wide open, but I’d rather have someone who can scrummage play with the ball in hand and throw a fecking line out straight. I thought Paul was left out because of off field stuff because on field he was the best of the decade. Cannon ? Don’t make me laugh.

    • Noddy

      what makes you think Paul could throw straight?

      On the one hand you want someone to throw straight and scrummage and then you discount Cannon?

      • Pedro

        What makes you think he can’t? We didn’t constantly turn the ball over for not throwing straight when he was in the team.

        Obviously I touched a raw nerve on the Cannon thing, I just like more razzle dazzle in my hookers. Paul was a game changer.

        I think you would have to discount Cannon if he were to be sold next to Paul.

        • El Dommo

          Paul was a weak experiment at someone trying to play 4 loose forwards….who was smart enought to get his head in s crum in order to keep the gold jerseys coming.

          Cannon is like the Anton Oliver of Australian rugby.
          everyone yelling for Mealamu, Oliver is the man who directs everyone in the right way, does the tough stuff, and doesnt pretend he should be wearing double figures.
          Everyone is yelling for Paul…but when the scrum counted….and the Lineouts were tight…and ball contest was everything….Cannon was the man for the job.

          if you like razzle dazzle in hookers, maybe you should stick to watching junior rugby where everyone gets a run of the ball, since in the mans game, a razzle dazzle hooker can often be more of a curse than a blessing.

        • Pedro

          Once again I am encouraged by the fact the El Dommo has the opposite view to me. This is the greastest indicator of a correct viewpoint that I can think of.

          I like razzle dazzle in everything, maybe you should watch northern hemisphere rugby if you’re against the running game.

          El Dommo, your argument is just hearsay and conjecture. I mean what was all the crap about Anton Oliver and Kevin Mealamu all about?

    • fatprop

      Paul was a seagull

      • http://stuandrews.com Stu Andrews

        He was a beautiful man with a full head of hair.

  • http://stuandrews.com Stu Andrews

    Jeremy Paul for the win. His gameplay was uncanny, almost smith-esque :)

    • http://stuandrews.com Stu Andrews

      Mind you, my memory of the time when he was playing is hazy at best.

    • Davey

      By “Smith-esque” you mean pushing Larkham aside so he could stand at 10?

      • http://stuandrews.com Stu Andrews

        Larkham couldn’t be pushed, he just ghosted around. So maybe he didn’t *want* to be there at that particular moment.

        Plus, I don’t know what you are talking about.

  • Robson

    It’s Jeremy babe for me too, with Foley coming in for second but a wee way behind. Moore is about level pegging with Foley, but TPN eclipsed him a couple of times off the bench this season.

  • Epi

    I like Cannon over Paul just for that right cross on Mealamu.

    • http://Fatpaddler.com Sean Smith – Fat Paddler

      An excellent point. Such a good punch captured so well by so many cameramen!

  • Rob42

    Huh, I never realised you were a chick. I suppose the picture fooled me.

    I had to go for Moore on the basis of the transforamtion of the scrum in the last 18 months, but I give an honourable mention to Cannon – well summed up by the picture above. His story of his Bledisloe sin-binning on a ruggamatrix podcast should be required listening.

    • Rob42

      That comment was supposed to be a reply to Stu Andrews’ (RugbyMan? hmmm) comment above, but came out as a comment of its own. Oh, and I’ll add a smiley face to avoid making the big man(?) angry: :-).

      • http://stuandrews.com Stu Andrews

        No beer and no tv make Stu *something* *something*

        HULK SMASH

  • Bobas

    Is this GAGR or SMH cos theres no way Cannon should be winning the Polling.

    I’d Go: Paul, Moore, Foley, TPN then Cannon.

    Cannon was a hack and rude to his Tah Fans.

    Paul had all the skills and brought the most to the position.

    • Bobas

      Also GAGR doesn’t work on my firefox, it says its changing servers when i load the page….

    • Noddy

      “Cannon was a hack and rude to his Tah Fans”

      did big bad Brendan not give you an autograph after a game one day Bobas?

      Nice grudge!

      • Bobas

        No, a mate of mine actually asked for an autograph. Cannon said he’d get a few others to sign it too and return in a minute, but he just took his pen and ball and walked off never to return.

        Thats why Cannon had to go to the force. Something about firepower admiring his attitude towards possessions.

        • Noddy

          wow. Accidently took your mate’s pen?

          I’m surprised he hasn’t been convicted yet. I assume you’re off to the Telegraph tomorrow about it all?

          Disgusting. How these players get away with it.

          Its funny you judge Cannon for a ‘stolen’ pen, but I assume you don’t know half of the stuff about a certain former Brumbies hooker…

        • El Dommo

          He is the original Convictus!

        • Bobas

          He took the ball too!

          I bet you were just made of pens and balls at 13 noddy.

          Its funny you over looked the ball issue, despite your testis obvioulsy still haven’t dropped. If Paul did things wrong come right out and say it rather than just to allude to it.

          I havent heard anything bad about Paul, except that Connelly hated him, hence not going to the 07 WC.

          So speak up if you have something to say, or are you too afraid of upsetting the internet police that got Lance in his post?

          Just ask yourself, WWLD?

    • Pedro

      As if Bobas is a Tahs fan, dream on.

  • http://beerandsport.net Moses

    As much as I like TPN it’s impossible to go past Cannon for contribution in the Noughties.

    • Bobas

      do you use these quotes on “tah’d for life”?

  • http://www.twitter.com/scrumblue scrumblue

    This thread is excellent. Passion. Hookers. Love it.

    I went with Foley. Bread and butter is key at hooker, and he was the one bloke who smashed it.

    Paul was able to shine because of a) the style of play Australia was promoting at the time; and b) his dictum to come off the bench in a fair swag of his tests and make things happen.

    Might I also note it was not Foley’s style of play that was deemed unfashionable, but that of his facial hair. Good to see he’s gotten rid of it in retirement (last time I checked???).

    • Noddy

      yep, surprised it is so close. I thought Paul would have walked away with it.

      Personally, I went for Foley.

    • El Dommo

      Can you have a word to Pedro, i am not sure he actually knows what a hooker is apart from the thing you find in bangkok that loves you long time.

      Stability is the key. Without a doubt, and cannon provides that in droves, however, Foley, much the same ilk as cannon became, considering they both played for Souths in brisbane its no real surprise they have similar styles, and of course, Foleys time at the reds was the reason cannon had to look elsewhere.

      Paul…come on scrumblue…dont contribute to the myth.

      Noddy: the only people who vote for Paul are backs and maybe loose forwards who knwo their workrate was supplemented by his seagulling.
      Cannon is the hooker for game purists.

      • Noddy

        glad we didn’t start this convo last night. You would never have been able to leave.

        I agree whole heartedly.

  • Gumby

    Paul for me. His support play and play in the loose was the best of all of them. Think he almost won us that fantastic game in 2000 at Telstra Stadium scoring a few minutes from time only to have Lomu snatch it away on the bell.

    He wasn’t bad with the rest of his duties either. Great player.

  • http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/ Gagger

    I live in the now, because my long term memory is SO SHIT.

    However, reaching back into the deep recesses of my mind, the associations I get when thinking over these guys is:

    • Foley – solid
    • Cannon – solid on a good day, “shit, not him!” on the rest
    • Paul – excitement machine

    As for Moore, I remember at the end of the 08 EOYT global commentators had him down as the best hooker in the world. How things changed this season.

    • Pedro

      I agree, I don’t get all the hate for Paul. No one hates Robinson and Alexander because they can run and pass. Is there any evidence that Paul couldn’t scrummage? Also he was good at the breakdown so I don’t get how the others are better considering Pauls obvious dominance in the open play.

      I just know when Paul was playing I was glad, anyone else in hooker and I was nervous. There’s a lot to be said for his obvious confidence, even if it made certain members of the rugby crowd dislike him.

      • ash

        From my memory Paul’s throwing was suspect, and he spent too much time in the centres and on the wing. Scrummaging was also called into question, but that’s hard to tell with hookers for fans. Hence why Foley, Cannon, etc were continually selected to start in front of Paul, who often looked fantastic in the S12.

        Now, Paul was a natural footballer, had loads of ball skills, could throw those flick passes and looked super. But in the tight…well…I like a real hooker. And that ain’t Paul. I went with Moore, narrowly in front of Foley and Cannon.

        Not to say I don’t admire flashy hookers – Keith Woods is a legend. But he could, and would, do the tight stuff too, unlike Paul.

        • Pedro

          From memory stuff is bollocks, we had the best lineout in the world during Paul’s time. Sure some of that would’ve been Cannon et al, but Paul was fine at throwing. At least better than the current lot.

          I just don’t get the attraction to Cannon, he was boring and adequate at best.

  • Cutter

    1. Cannon
    2. Foley
    3. Moore
    4. TPN
    5. Paul

    Paul is a soft version of TPN who can’t scrummage.

    • El Dommo

      I think i love you.

  • Bob

    Always felt Foley was one of the most under-rated players of the modern era.

    That said, it’s tough to rate him best for this decade. Really is the toughest position (besides THP, but that is because of a complete lack of choice).

  • Sideshow

    This is a tough one, and none truly stand out amongst the others. So I went with the gut, and I remember years ago being a big fan of Paul, particularly in the loose, and also being appalled at him being unceremoniously dumped from the team after so many years of great service (apparently for liking a drink… seriously?!). The gut says Jeremy Paul. Cannon for a close second. I remember the year Freier became the pin up boy for the Waratahs pre season, Cannon clearly on the outer. But as the scrums went from faltering to solid when Cannon came on off the bench, Freier was eventually relegated, but Cannon had already signed with the Force.

Close