When Lachlan met Shakin’

Roscoe Tims December 5, 2011 42

No GravatarThe story goes that a good big man will always beat a good little man. Not so when it comes to the diminutive winger from Swansea, Shakin’ Shane Williams.

Dressing Room: James Bevan Trophy

Wales have a habit of producing outstanding fleet-footed wingers every decade or so like Ken Jones from the Fifties, Gerald Davies the Sixties, J.J. Williams, Ieuan Evans and so forth, most of whom were on the smallish side.

George North is probably going to be the next one although he’s a brute of a boy…

Yesterday’s Welsh test was all about Shakin’ Shane (some of his fans call him ‘ickle’ which is Brit slang for little) and his final test for Wales. He’s been around the international scene since 2000 and now retires with 87 caps for Wales and 4 for the British and Irish Lions.

The Welsh are a passionate lot and it was no surprise that the little man was a complete emotional mess both before and after this match. There was no place to hide to blubber in private but you’d be a hard hearted prick if you weren’t endeared to this guy.

A legend at 80kg wringing wet, he got the send-off he deserved apart from not actually winning the match, which has been a common Welsh trait since the coal mining industry collapsed in the Seventies.

On the opposite wing was one Lachlan Turner Overdrive. Lachie has been around the Wallabies since 2008 but never quite cemented his position in the team, or in fact in the squad. I guess he’s on this tour because of injuries to others.

But in both matches on this junket he’s had storming games (yesterday he contained Shane Williams well). He’s used his pace and swerve to score classic winger’s tries but most importantly, he’s stopped putting boot to ball every time he’s confronted with an obstacle.

Ben Tapuai: First Cap

Lachie’s backed himself and now looks like becoming competitive for a wing spot within his own right. You can see how much he’s improved and he’s certainly justified his selection. This is going to be important now that JOC has been slated ‘for higher honours’.

I’m not sure that QC will be shaking in his boots just yet as some have predicted — the next Dan Carter — eh? JOC consolidated yesterday from the Baa-Baas free-for-all and in a more pressured environment looked quite the busy and skilful ball playing five eighth.

His cut-out pass to a flying LTO for the winger’s try was QCesque. I wonder whether he can do that left handed as well?

He’s bigger and stronger than you think and uses his core strength, footwork and guile when he takes on the line. This always challenges the defence and yesterday he frequently got over the gain line and was always looking for a sneaky offload if he could get his arms free.

The game plan was about width and he spent most of the time distributing the pill. Yeah, needs to work on his kicking game but this experiment has provided us with another option and should be persevered with at some stage. That tackle on Jamie Roberts was a goodie too.

I thought that Berrick Barnes should have been the MOTM. Don’t get me wrong, Diggers was everywhere and quite the battering ram but I think it became a little too predictable. It would have been nice if they found a bit more space for him to rampage. Isn’t it great that he’s signed for another three years?

Berrick is Mr Mature personified and supremely suited to test rugby. He offered solidity and calmness in the midfield and his option-taking second-to-none. His kicking game was first class (the chip for LTO’s ‘no try’ superb) and frequently moved into first receiver. He was rewarded with a meat pie after backing up DK.

Shakin' Shane

The set piece work by the forwards was impressive. Most of our lineouts were won and we looked the more dominant at scrum time. We were heavily penalised by Kaplan at first half breakdowns with Bam Pocock lucky not to be carded.

Ben McCalman and Higgers were the pick of the forwards and both got through a power of work. I don’t have any of the defensive statistics available but Diggers (not Higgers) was actually involved in more rucks than any of the forwards…

McCalman really shone as a ball carrying option and supposedly took over the no. 7 role when Pocock went off at halftime with a serious ankle injury. In fact, they effectively didn’t have a fetcher in the second half although it probably didn’t matter as much as it has in some other games but when will they ever learn?

I thought the match itself was a bit flat in the first half and there were similarities to our last outing against Wales. Arm wrestle in the first half, get ahead in the second but defending at the end against a Welsh comeback.

We scored our three tries in the second half during the ten minute period that Leigh Halfpenny spent in the sin-bin for an early tackle on JOC (Genia off the base of a ruck, Turner and Barnes).

Oh, and the score was 24-18 with the little man dotting down his final international try on the bell. It naturally brought the house down…

The short tour — pass mark+ to Robbie Deans and co. It could have been a potential disaster but the crew were focussed and tactically played to their strengths.

Discussion »

  • MrMouse

    Agree with everything you said. After his last 3 performances, Barnes should be first picked next test, JOC provides another option, and Lachie has his mojo back.

    Actually I guess not everything, because I don’t believe I “can see how much he’s improved”. He showed this form years ago (no mean feat at 24), and over a fair period, but for one reason or another has had a massive crisis of confidence and form. The Tahs persevered with him but did little to help him out of the slump, but whether on the training paddock or away from footy he seems to have gotten that back and is playing the way Tahs fans know he can. He’s still behind Schmoo and Diggers but he appears now to be next in line.

    • commonasmud

      Nah, if Turner can (finally) maintain this form, “Turnstile” Mitchell is destined for the bench. Doesn’t have Mitchell’s massive boot, but can at least reliably tackle, and is at least his equal in sniffing out a try.

  • Skip

    Once again i remind myself of my skepticism a while back when you wrote “on your bike, Quade, we’ve got J’OC” and apologize. I like having a 10 who tackles. Be interesting to see how much Quade signs for (if he does) next time.

    • Lance Free

      Now that you reminded me I’ve just had another look at that post Skip http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/on-ya-bike-quade-weve-got-joc/

      Bold and visionary prediction on my behalf again? Ah, not really. I had the advantage of seeing him play five eighth a number of times as a schoolboy for Nudgee College (as well as QC for Churchie). He had all the skills then so it was a bit of a ‘no-brainer’.

      I guess the good news is that it increases our no. 10 (and/or 12) options but really it was only a matter of time. Combo’s of QC, JOC, Toomua, Berrick, Taps, Fingers etc suggests a bright future for our inside backs.

      • Garry

        It might be time to gt Woody back on the pod cast mike. See if he’s changed his opinion of his thoughts on Bieber’s no.10 prospects? He wouldn’t be the first coach to make a oversight.

        And while your at it, in the light of the BaaBaas game, get Macqueen’s thoughts on the new Rebels no.10 predicament.

        My 2 cents. Despite the (international) preference for big 12′s lately, I still prefer his skills in the space that this position allows. I’d like to see him outside Barnsey at second fly.

    • Mart

      Good point. He does solve the tackling option.

    • Chig

      Quade’s not done yet by any stretch but he hasn’t done himself any favours by telegraphing his interest in the NRL and signing 1 year deals. The ARU doesn’t want uncertainty and have looked for a back up option. We are now begining to build depth in that position with Barnes and JOC. Quade’s bargaining power is diminishing a touch now. We were over a barrel before but now not so much. I hope he stays. He’s brilliant to watch. Loyalty is rewarded with a send off similar to that which Shane Williams was given. Diggers decision to sign a 3 year deal is setting himself up for something similar. Quade has to decide what is best for him. A few more dollars in the short term or rugby ‘immortality’ that will bring much more financial reward in the long term.

  • James

    I often think how absolutely freaking awesome it would be to have George smith off the bench to cover 6,7,8. ‘Sigh’. Or hell start at 8 with DK off the bench & a reshuffle. I mean he’s only 30? And would still bring more to the team then McCalman, rocky, hodgson, beau or even Palu (he hasn’t been right for years now)

    • Joe Mac

      Not to worry; Liam Gill will be stamping his mark all over the Wallabies by the Lions tour. Pocock will not only have a back up but some stiff competition for that 7 jersey

      • Craig Johanson

        Chris Alcock is another potential for the fetcher role.
        Another season in Super 15 and we’ll see a lot more of these players develop.
        Going to be an interesting 2012 with the Argies in there as well.
        Would like to see us field a team in the Pacific Nations Cup though.

    • Patrick

      Damn straight.

  • suckerforred

    Just my thoughts :

    a) I think that the biggest reason that we are seeing improvement in the Wallabies backline play is that we have a decent centres combination now – Barnes at 12, and a hard hitting defender at 13. Agree that Barnes should have been MOTM.

    b) How long is it going to take for Deans to realise that we need a backup for Pocock that is not McCalmun. I love Poey and I don’t think that there is another fetcher that will knock him out of the starting lineup for a while. But without another specialist, or at least a flanker that then play other positions in the back row, we are on a hiding to nothing if (god forbid when) he is injured. The 7 position is just a place that takes a lot out of the body and I think that we need manage the players here so that we do not loose someone because of over work. McCalman well at 8, leave him there.

    c) Until we see QC at 10 and Barnes at 12 in a game or two we are not going to know if JOC is the best person there or not. IMO, it is the combinations that have a big influence on how the teams perform in centre field. One thing that I do like about JOC’s game is his willingness to take the contact if there are not any options for the pass. Something that I think QC struggles with which results in him trying a few low percentage passes when he should just take the tackle, run the phases and set it up again. But again, how would this change if he was playing with Berick at 12?

    d) I feel that I am going to have a great big chunk of humble pie coming my way if AAC continues to perform that well at fullback. Having said that – current world’s best backline: 9 Genia 10 JOC/QC 11 Diggers 12 Barnes 13 AAC/Ant 14 JOC/AAC 15 Kurtley with Turner or Mitchell and Taps on the bench. Now wouldn’t it have been nice to see that run in the WC.

    e) Squeaky needs to be first choice hooker. Not sure what has happened to TPN but scrum seems to be struggling with him in 2. And it will be nice to see the Ben’s back to form. What would a front row of Alexander, Moore and Robinson bring to the game?

    f) Did anyone else notice that Taps must have spent most of the last few weeks in the gym on some heavy weights sessions! I swear that he wasn’t that big in the Super Season. Good to see him get a run.

    g) Good to see Higgers have a reasonable game. Not sure if internationally he can compete with Rocky when Rocky is at the top of his game, which Rocky hasn’t been for a year or more. (Sorry Rock. Still a fav but that is how I see it.)

    h) Still can’t see Dean’s preference for Simmo over Sharpie. Please explain?

    And lastly – I still don’t think that the Wallabies would have beaten the AB’s with that performance. but it would have been closer. Keep it up boys and the Bledisloe might be ours.

    • commonasmud

      mostly agree SFR. Definately need to have a dedicated back up 7 in any extended squad. But I think it’s a luxury to pick a dedicated 7 on your bench. The ABs don’t, hence (former Red) Dan Braid not getting the caps he surely deserved.

      Yes, that should have been our RWC backline. Still wouldn’t have won with our forwards stuck in reverse.

      Isn’t Sharpie a great team man? He must be frustrated, but he just puts his head down and gets on with it (hello Simon Kat-bitch, are you paying attention?).

      • suckerforred

        Agree re not having the room for a specialist 7 on the bench. But we sure as hell need to find a backrow replacement that is better at playing 7 then McCalmum. Any suggestions? Fairly sure Higgers or DK wouldn’t perform much better.

        • Lance Free

          I think with a 5/2 bench you can have a no. 7 backup. In the case of Hodgson he can also play at 6 & 8 at a pinch, although size is a factor (actually, McCalman is only 5kg heavier). It will be interesting when Gill comes on line internationally.

        • Wallabies first, Force second

          Hodgson should have been on the bench. I’m happy for him to be a bench specialist as he covers 6,7,8 well. He shone the week before and deserved the run more than Samo. Samo looked tired in warm up and was lame after 5 mins. Deans needs to learn how to manage players; especially looking after Pocock. But deans is a proven slow learner.

    • Garry

      reading this post, I can’t help feeling that for most of the points listed, this information was already obvious before the RWC, in whole or at least becoming apparent, to any average punter who is closely following the WB’s (no disrespect at all ‘suckerforred’)

      My question is – with all the resources and rugby brains at the WB’s disposal, why wasn’t it apparent to the people that matter most? It’s still very sinister to me.

      These are two games we needed 12 months ago. But did we need QC to break his leg to get them, or could our selectors shown more vision or experimentation to produce competition for position in the halves? We are told that we don’t have depth in position, but remember these players have been there all along. Could these points be oversights, or?

      • suckerforred

        Yep, hence I listed them like that. I don’t know whether it is sinister or stubborn on the part of the selectors. Starting to wonder if the hierarchy in ARU are having trouble seeing the forest for the trees.

        Hey Gager, you know the 10 questions that we asked Link, can we do the same with Deans. Question 1 – Can you explain why you keep using McCalmum as a backup 7, why you only had one specialist 7 in the RWC squad, what McCabe has that kept Berrick out of the centres and what the hell has Sharpie done to you?

        Oh, sorry, that’s four.

        • Robson

          Would definitely like to see Deans under the same scrutiny.

        • Moz

          The rest of the questions could then be in relation to his answers.

          Q5 – are you fxxking serious about your answer to Q1??
          Q6 – are you fxxking serious about your answer to Q2?

          etc..

        • Mucca

          Add Gits into that fourth question as well.

  • Mart

    Lance. Im not convinced about “the mountain of work” that McCalman got through. And Simmons for that matter. I’m quoting the commentators here.

    McCalman played a better game, but I’m yet to see a dominant run, tackle or clear out. When he compete’s at a ruck it’s usually ineffective.

    I think the stats will not truly show the real story here. His Grimalde (ex bulldogs) style tackle assists/ second man in, will add to his tackle count no doubt.

    I saw one ruck, where Occonor was bridging protecting the ball and Simmons cleared him out, exposing the ball. Then Mcalman came in cleared over fell on his back and the ball was turned over. The Welsh ran off up the field.

    Does this then go down in the stats as clearouts for Simmons and McCalman?

    Hence Robbie or whoever can look at the stats sheet and say, wow these guys are getting through a mountain of work.

    I’ve been a bit of a McCalman basher. But i think Robbie has persisted and got little reward. They need to give someone else a go.

    • Lance Free

      He topped the carries and ruck involvements for the forwards. As you say, stats maybe don’t tell the whole story. I think what stood out for me was his ball carrying. He got across the gain line more often than not and looked pretty effective. This season he hasn’t really had that much of an impact but he did the other day. Still young and room for improvement.

    • Robson

      “I saw one ruck, where Occonor was bridging protecting the ball and Simmons cleared him out, exposing the ball. Then Mcalman came in cleared over fell on his back and the ball was turned over. The Welsh ran off up the field. Does this then go down in the stats as clearouts for Simmons and McCalman?”

      I don’t know about the stats, but what it does do is emphasise the absence of any cohesive Wallaby plan at the breakdown. There is no lack of enthusiasm, but hell, the Wallabies work at the breakdown was like watching a school 2nd XV play. Whilst the set piece was fine, the breakdown still leaves a great deal to be desired.

      • Mart

        Still think they should be working on Timani to take a spot in the row.

  • Mart

    Yep good point about getting over the gain line. He did do that this game.

    Hence it was a good game for him, i haven’t seen that in the past. At all.

    The question is does he do enough? Are there others who could do better?

    He is young, I reckon he’s had quite a few caps now. He needs to get bigger and better.

    • suckerforred

      Better certainly. Bigger not so sure.

  • Joe Mac

    Hopefully this is the end of the McCalman experiment. He needs next off season to focus on getting bigger (like Mowen did) if he wants a chance to be world class in his position. Hopefully he can do a Turner and use his time off to really improve his game…

    Obviously the whole season is ahead of us but hopefully Ita Vaea has kept growing in the offseason as he looks to have the potential to become the Wallabies 1st choice 8. The only other option that comes to mind is trying to get Timani playing 8 this season…

  • Reds Fan 2012

    The scrum is more solid on the field with Simmons over Sharpe and so is the lineout. (Simmons calls it). Sharpey is a great player but plays too loose for my liking, he has a good impact as a ball carrier when the opposition forwards are tiring. I haven’t agreed with a lot decisions relating to the forwards this season but this is the right one IMO which I have spruiked all year. Just because the commentators aren’t calling their name doesn’t mean they aren’t having a good game. 1 cleanout failure is not much when you have done it 20 times a match.

  • suckerforred

    Any news on Bam Bam’s ankle?

    • Wallabies first, Force second

      Poey’s ankle will be gone with moonboot rest. Good news

  • Nabley

    Sorry to disappoint this little group hug on MOTM, but my choice was that guy with the very Welsh sounding name, Faletau. A No 8 that produced 80 running m when most are happy with 30, had hands of gold, won a power of ball in lineouts and breakdowns, and was always there when the work needed to be done. Barnes was certainly better than Ioane, but Faletau was better still. I was as surprised as the commentary staff when Ioane was announced.

  • hightower

    Reds man love continues after the glow of the super 15 win. When discussing Pocock’s long term successor/short term back up Reds supporters cant see past Liam Gill, I suggest that one or both Brumbies Colby Faingaa and Michael Hooper( Australian u/20 player of the year) will be well in the mix in the next two years.

    • Nabley

      Liam is good, but still very young in rugby terms.

    • Joe Mac

      If you spent time on the forum Hightower you would know that I am actually a rabbid Tah’s fan. I think Colby will be a super star as would any of the other Fangaa boys if they played breakaway which is their best position. Hooper will also be a great player but above all I think Gill will be number 1.

    • Reds Fan 2012

      Hightower, Liam Gill didn’t go to the under 20′s World Cup because he was too busy helping a team win the Championship! ;)

      If he did he would have been the run on 7, no doubt which would have cancelled Hooper out. I reckon he’ll take the Championship over an award any day of the week. I don’t disagree both players you have mentioned are quality but you don’t have to be reds fan to appreciate that Liam Gill has something a little bit more.

  • murph

    Good to see Turner put in a come of good games. He played really well.

  • Nabley

    I was looking forward to seeing the matchup between Pocock and Warburton. I think it will be between these two as to who takes over McCaws mantle unless the ABs blood someone like Todd. As suggested, Pocock was almost carded and had a tough first half until he was injured off. I did think that Kaplan was a bit harsh, given that he was penalised for not carrying his weight when reaching for a ball that had not touched the ground. But then Kaplan did exactly the same to Warburton later on. Pocock was faster than Warburton, but needs a bit of sense at the breakdown. Warburton on the other hand had a better running, support and continuity game than Pocock. This is a marked weakness of Pococks, while a great scavenger, he is not a good ball runner and that may just stop greatness. I thought the matchup all in all, was pretty even on the night.

    • Alan

      Pocock has been better then McCaw for years now. McCaw – as great as he is {was} has consistently played alongside a great pack and strong scrum.

      He has had to play with soft cock forwards for ages and still manages to dominate rucks game in game out

      He’s has also been running with the ball alot more recently, which I’m delighted to see. He will get better

      • Robson

        Yep, McCaw gets brillaint support at the breakdown especially from Kieran Read and Jerome Kaino. If Pocock got that even half that kind of support he would achieve turnover after turnover.

      • Nabley

        Alan, I seem to recall that it was McCaw who won IRB Player of the year a year ago, not Pocock. So your time measuring stick maybe wrongly calibrated.

        I always try and separate the also ran games from the real top tier stuff when thinking about who is best and what they can do. We know for example that Cooper at Super level is a bloody good player, but get him into a top tier Test where space is limited, times reduced and oppositions much more accurate and he simply has difficulty functioning. Pocock against the Baa Baas was great with ball in hand but against Wales, nah.

  • Robson

    I feel like a voice wailing against the wind in the wilderness here. The Wallabies scrum has, thank goodness, finally got some steel back (even with Ma’afu at TH) and there has been a return to accuracy (mostly) in the lineout, but we still struggle at the breakdown. The breakdown is a much more contestable area of the game than either scrums or lineouts and it’s crying out for some skilled coaching input. Actually it’s crying out for some coaching input of any kind.

Close