Ian Macintosh
Bob McCowan (2)
Watched the Kings versus Scots on Streamer....and the 2nds. It was very close for the 1st teams. Overall the games were not of a good standard expected at this level (or perhaps Im expecting too much at schoolboys). I only viewed the game once - so I haven't analysed it using all the complex stats 1st team coaching teams have.
I think Scots outperformed themselves in the game. They managed to score and definitely have the x factor in this area. Making opportunities from not much and having very little momentum in the game.
Kings was overall the better team. They had both the forward pack and the backs which I believe in both areas they were superior. I though in defence the allowed some easy tries. Both teams did, but I thought the tries Scots achieved were from open / loose play or a basic defense error close to try line. Both teams defence were poor, but more so Kings. To be up by several tries and not capitalise off it is poor. They also did not have a great kicker (in both games) missing out on applying extra pressure.
I thought Kings pack was superior and did not use this to their advantage enough in the game. They managed to put Scots under pressure with size and power and should have utilised this more.
Both teams back 3 made poor decisions at times leading to tries. Either running when they should have kicked or just been poor at not catching a chip kick and placement etc.
Good to watch and was not sure who was going to win for a large part of the game. I think Kings has potential for a whole rugby approach (use backs or forwards) -Im not sure if Scots could manage this approach as most tries - backs based.
Looking forward to seeing what happens next game.
I think Scots outperformed themselves in the game. They managed to score and definitely have the x factor in this area. Making opportunities from not much and having very little momentum in the game.
Kings was overall the better team. They had both the forward pack and the backs which I believe in both areas they were superior. I though in defence the allowed some easy tries. Both teams did, but I thought the tries Scots achieved were from open / loose play or a basic defense error close to try line. Both teams defence were poor, but more so Kings. To be up by several tries and not capitalise off it is poor. They also did not have a great kicker (in both games) missing out on applying extra pressure.
I thought Kings pack was superior and did not use this to their advantage enough in the game. They managed to put Scots under pressure with size and power and should have utilised this more.
Both teams back 3 made poor decisions at times leading to tries. Either running when they should have kicked or just been poor at not catching a chip kick and placement etc.
Good to watch and was not sure who was going to win for a large part of the game. I think Kings has potential for a whole rugby approach (use backs or forwards) -Im not sure if Scots could manage this approach as most tries - backs based.
Looking forward to seeing what happens next game.