• Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums. As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.

CAS Rugby 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.

SonnyDillWilliams

Nev Cottrell (35)
I see that Knox are playing at the unusual (but very sensible) time of 4:15pm ... at Knox

if the game is anything like as good as last years game versus St Augustines, it could be worth the trek

or for the complete die-hards you could watch the first half of the Joeys v Barker game at 3:15 pm (at Barker) and then shoot down to Turramurra for what should be the pre-season match of the round :)

If Waverley are serious about being contenders they might want to send a scout to the Knox game ... however Waves never seems to take it that seriously ... at least not to go to those lengths ... besides probably be kids backing up for Roosters duties ... not sure
 
R

Runpasstackle

Guest
Any idea if Knox had any players meant to be in the 16s played in the opens trial. As with the delayed kick off. Auggies would have had a full strength side. After the Harold matts side for manly got rolled by the Sharks at midday.
 

rod skellet

Bob Davidson (42)
I will do a write up of the Joeys v Barker match tomorrow. Lots of positives from a Barker perspective despite the sorry scoreline. And for "William" both Reimer and Tejcek played well. Joeys were just to big, strong and fast.
 

CatchnPass

Vay Wilson (31)
Any idea if Knox had any players meant to be in the 16s played in the opens trial. As with the delayed kick off. Auggies would have had a full strength side. After the Harold matts side for manly got rolled by the Sharks at midday.
No, they all played 16s, though they did lose centre Tom Cameron with concussion 20 mins in. Rods description of Joeys above applies equally to the Augs u16s
 

SonnyDillWilliams

Nev Cottrell (35)
looks like Knox are firming as favorites ... unless St Augustines is having a rare weak year?

Either way the Joeys v Knox fixture on April 30 will be interesting!

Was Matt Williams still the Knox coach ... as I was thinking that posts re his departure might have been BS?

Who was the knox 8? Someone stepping up to fill Swinton's big boots ..

Re the Under 16s ... I wouldn't take too much from that result ... St Augustines have always been ridiculously strong in that age group

and good to see Cameron still playing in his right age group as the Waverley v Knox 16As should be a full strength affair
 

rod skellet

Bob Davidson (42)
Barker v St Joseph’s
I popped up to Barker to watch what I was expecting to be a white wash. The GPS thread has Joey’s as a real contender this year while Barker must rebuild from being at the bottom of the CAS ladder in 2015.
The 2nds showed spirit but lost 50/7 with Joey’s no 7 Paddy Dalton a standout. (He would walk into any CAS 1st XV side) Their no 10 Lachlan Day would also be amongst the first picked with a deadly accurate boot (6 from 7 conversions) and speed to burn. (Depth: the joys of attending Australia’s no 1 rugby nursey)
During the warm up, the Joey’s 1st XV boys looked strong, fit, mobile and very skilled. They worked their set piece with military precision. There was no exceptionally tall lads in their forwards but they certainly worked well as a unit.
Barker’s forward have added some bulk this year with Anstey, Woodgate and Webb providing some much needed starch to a reliable and solid front row.
An unforced error on kick off from Barker (one of many during the game) handed the momentum to Joey’s. Despite Joey’s winning their own scrums and lineouts with ease, the Barker forwards really scrapped it out. Hard hits by the Barker forwards and some desperate tackling by the backs, kept the Joey’s lads at bay. Sything runs by No8 Miti Tuinakauvadra and Capt no 13 Yirrbi Jaffer-Williams were repelled, many times only metres from the Barker try line. The inevitability of a cricket score was very real, but as yet unrealised.
Barker then started to link some phases. The forwards made the lads in cerise tackle. The Barker backs, although not as skilled or as fast as Joey’s, made solid inroads into the opposition. The Barker forwards had their tails up. After 18 minutes of good rugby, a rolling maul by the reds, gave Barker no9 David Tejcek some rare front foot ball. A bullet pass to no 10 Jayden Kitchener and Barker was over for the first score of the game.
Unfortunately Jayden was badly injured in the collision on the try line. A lengthy delay ensued while he was attended to. Apparently it was an accidental blow to the neck shoulder. Both teams are to be congratulated on their concern and applause when Jayden was taken from the field.
With their No 10 gone, Barkers 2nd XV no 10 came on. Having played a full and torrid game already, being thrust into this cauldron was a big ask.
The game started to turn. Joey’s with more possession and with speed and power, made light work of scoring tries. From this writers view the entire Joey’s back line would have been selected as the CAS 1st back line in 2015. Their ability to step off either foot, retain possession at the tackle and keep ball in hand across the park was a delight to watch.
Wingers Jacob Patmore and Joey Kandalaft were brilliant as was No18 (sorry for the no name here).
With Barker a man down in the sin bin, Joeys started racking up the tries, with No 10 Ryley Angus-Corke kicking goals from all corners of the park. The inevitability was unfolding.
With the scoreboard ticking over for Joey’s, the outcome became abundantly clear. This game proved to be a solid hit out for the Joey’s pack and the opportunity for a slick well drilled backline to strut their stuff. No doubt much sterner opposition awaits Joey’s in the GPS comp.
Barker did not give up, and eventually put reserve back no 19 (Mackensie Newell) over for a late try.
The wrap up from this writers view is that Joey’s will be a contender in the GPS comp in 2016. Their only weakness is a lack of tall timber to contest opposition line outs. The rest of the team is very solid and they have some class in the backs to make life difficult for any opposition schools team.

For Barker, there is a lot to be excited about. The forwards will hold their own this year in the CAS comp, and the backs have some good young players in Van Woerkom, Marais, Grundy and Tejcek to keep the scoreboard attendant busy through the year. Here’s hoping young Jayden is ok!
 

Shane Smeltz

Fred Wood (13)
looks like Knox are firming as favorites . unless St Augustines is having a rare weak year?

Either way the Joeys v Knox fixture on April 30 will be exciting

Re the Under 16s . I wouldn't take too much from that result . St Augustines have always been ridiculously strong in that age group

and good to see Cameron still playing in his right age group as the Waverley v Knox 16As should be a full strength affair

Knox did play well and took advantage of errors from Auggies.
Knox very large especially the forward pack. The canteen would have been emptied at the end of the game I would wager.

Auggies had a couple of their best players finish school suddenly, for personal reasons, last month. Boys who are ISA players, forwards. Another key forward was injured.
The difference between the two pack scrums would have been more than 100kg.

Auggies 1sts are going to have to dig deep this year - but there's always those ridiculously overachieving 16s to have a look at.....
 

Elfster

Dave Cowper (27)
Was Matt Williams still the Knox coach . as I was thinking that posts re his departure might have been BS?

Who was the knox 8? Someone stepping up to fill Swinton's big boots ..


It looked as though Williams was still the coach.

M Basson was the 8. I didn't know most of the players, but it appears they have a fair few back from last year. Knox looks as though they have some depth in the opens. The backs looked sharp in the seconds, so should be adding pressure to those in the firsts. However the 2nd would have disappointed with their discipline - they had 2 players sin binned and eased off considerably to allow Auggies to score the last 19 points unanswered.

For the Firsts.

Negatives.
Line out was not as effective as it could be - overly complicated resulting in some missed opportunities. Though they disrupted that of Auggies with ease.

Some players over played their hand at times and some of their play lacked structure. This led to one of St Augustine's tries with an intercept. But it is early days and these structural things should be easily addressed.

Positives.

The side looks well balanced and drilled. This, together with the depth, will be a positive.

The backs looked quite potent. Some good speed, and early season combination and understanding (despite my point in the negative section). They look to have a couple of classy attacking players in the backs.

A strong scrum and some good mauling, easily marching the opposition back at times.
Some large forwards who display great pace and handling. A couple of the forwards easily matched the speed of their opponent's backs. The Knox number 5 is very large - he won at least one opposition's line out without jumping.

Aggressive and effective defence
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top