Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums.
As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.
ok, not bias but yes i have only made comments on the ashgrove boys
1. watch the word absolutely. it was a close 11 points with ashgrove not being able to capitalise numerous occasions (yes same with padua) and the cards is no excuse, the idiots shouldn't have got them self carded.
2. yes...
well no because as previously stated padua has extremely good defense and i believe it was our backs that couldn't capitalise..
and yes on paper it mighten be our strongest team in previous years but table wise its the best in a while
don't get me wrong like it probably was still ashgroves best backline but I don't really know. oh well, way to late to change it obviously hahah but yeah its always a tough choice for ash and would be interesting what our team would be like with different backlines (goes for all recent years)
They will all be good games
the rivalry between ash and lauries at lauries,
the two hard hitter pad v peters
the fight for 3rd pats v eddies - both teams who are just solid well drilled teams that will be a close game
all round a great final round for the AIC good luck to all teams...
Ok, may I just state a few things,
yes I'm an Ashgrove Man so I don't get to watch the other schools week in week out but my points are still highly valid don't be childish and say that I'm completely biased
1. ASH v PAD: Yes Padua won but that that doesn't make them the "better" team. A...