Taking the points at the time was exactly the right thing to do.
The Rebels lost the game due to handling errors and a couple of absolute head-scratching yellow cards.
The Rebels biggest issue for the last few years has been an inability to manage the ball when in possession.
They appear to.
Having a good squad on paper is only valuable if you play on paper.
The reality is the quality of the squads has been vastly over estimated.
Effectively merging two average sides does not suddenly make a great side it just makes a larger average side.
It has always in that time been a squad with.
I think that Hosea and Neville could be test quality but they need the opportunity to show their wares at that level.
I haven't seen enough of Uru or the others yet to say either way.
Except for LSL who I have never been a huge fan of and think there are better options.
I would not want to see Petaita at Full back. He has a huge amount of talent and can do some amazing things but can also have brain explosions which at Full back is a recipe for disaster. I am not sure if his kicking is that strong either but I stand to be corrected on that.
I like Hodge in the.
The fact that your girlfriend isn't Charlize Theron does not mean she chases parked cars.
Simmons is an unexciting but solid citizen.
He does what a second rower should, good in the lineout, solid tight defence, adds to the scrum. It would be great if he was a little more dynamic at times.
There are a few surprises to me.
Isi not making it is a massive head-scratcher.
Swinton even being considered is a little confusing to me as all I see he brings is a faux tough man image.
Bell and Ainsley over Hoopert and Orr on form is simply nonsensical.
Itikau is simply bizarre.
I personally would not bring in anyone outside of the Australian based players this year. I understand when people say you shouldn't use test matches to develop players. However, you have to develop them sometime and preferably before the next WC. Why not reward the guys that stayed here such as.
I understand that it means that but I think the issue is that due to some questionable judiciary rulings in the past that lovely chap Farrell is still somehow a clean skin.
However, question. Does it really take into account the type of offence?
So you can get a good behaviour benefit for being.