Player off-field non-rugby transgressions

[fatprop]

Two levels for f*cked up to me

1/ Newly married with a young kid and out on the pull - just a hard no
2/ Then allegedly non consensual


I find "1" just abhorrent, let alone the multiplier of "2"

 

[stillmissit]

Ok, so he's guilty by many posters here. Is nobody going to wait and see? Thank christ our law is not in your hands.

 

[fatprop]

Ok, so he's guilty by many posters here. Is nobody going to wait and see? Thank christ our law is not in your hands.

All he is guilty of at the moment is cheating on his wife

 

[dillyboy]

Ok, so he's guilty by many posters here. Is nobody going to wait and see? Thank christ our law is not in your hands.

Despite what many jilted guy claims it's extremely rare for a woman to put herself through the scrutiny involved in a false rape allogation let alone one where there'll also be media involved due to it being a known personality.......

 

[cyclopath]

The thread is for player off-field rugby transgressions, it's turned into a thread about the Lehrmann trial. It's inappropriate and unwise to draw parallels between the two cases, which you have done both in this thread AND during the initial discussions in Wallabies 2023. Probably time to give it a rest.

This.
1000x.