• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Wallabies 2025

JRugby2

Arch Winning (36)
The pick and drive needs to be varied with a short pass to another pod. That’s far harder to defend. The pick and go from halfback isn’t asking enough questions of the try line defence.
If executed - don't have stats to back up this assumption but guessing you're more likely to fumble the ball with a pass rather than pick and go. You also potentially sacrifice support at the break down if you have more players setting up a wider pod (increase risk of turnover).You have to time it right too - it takes longer to set up a pod then running from the base, also takes longer for the ball to get to the pod when you add a pass (defense can start advancing before the ball even reaches the pod) so you could sacrifice metres.

Personally, would guess that a pick and go and probably less risky and more likely to pay off (ie try/ penalty)
 

Major Tom

Chilla Wilson (44)
If executed - don't have stats to back up this assumption but guessing you're more likely to fumble the ball with a pass rather than pick and go. You also potentially sacrifice support at the break down if you have more players setting up a wider pod (increase risk of turnover).You have to time it right too - it takes longer to set up a pod then running from the base, also takes longer for the ball to get to the pod so you could sacrifice metres.

Personally, would guess that a pick and go and probably less risky and more likely to pay off (ie try/ penalty)

Mate, if you can’t catch a short pass that close to the line than you don’t deserve a try. I’m also not in favour of just that tactic. It’s about varying it. Which in the last few game we have not done. By passing to a another pod yes you risk them dropping the ball or being isolated, but you also force the defensive line to bite in on that potential ball carrier allowing the half back to pick and drive at a potential hole in defence. I don’t have a problem keeping it simple and hammering away in tight but just pick and diving ain’t gonna do it at this level.
 

JRugby2

Arch Winning (36)
Mate, if you can’t catch a short pass that close to the line than you don’t deserve a try. I’m also not in favour of just that tactic. It’s about varying it. Which in the last few game we have not done. By passing to a another pod yes you risk them dropping the ball or being isolated, but you also force the defensive line to bite in on that potential ball carrier allowing the half back to pick and drive at a potential hole in defence. I don’t have a problem keeping it simple and hammering away in tight but just pick and diving ain’t gonna do it at this level.
I broadly agree with what your saying - but as you acknowledge, a pass increases the risk you don't get and pay off (as does spinning it wide before you've caused a penalty).

You absolutely need to be able to execute both variations but side by side - hammering away is the lowest risk, highest rate of return and we have countless examples of it working for us at this level this year so I strongly disagree with that last bit.

Again I think we are really over analysing a poor showing and taking the wrong learnings from it. We fucked it on the weekend because some idiot tried to jump over the ruck. The tactic wasn't wrong, it was the in-the-moment decision making and poor execution that butchered the try.
 
Last edited:

Dctarget

Jason Little (69)
What I don't get is that we finish within a score or two of the Lions, England, South Africa and New Zealand. Would Italy be able to do that?
 

rugbyAU

Peter Johnson (47)
What I don't get is that we finish within a score or two of the Lions, England, South Africa and New Zealand. Would Italy be able to do that?
No way, Italy lost 45-0 and 42-24 to SA earlier this year and play them this week, last year lost by 20 to NZ and 80 at the WC and lost by 23 to England, last year they lost to Samoa who will be the 24th side to make the WC and lost by 30 to Arg
 

Spamnoodle

Jim Clark (26)
Loathe it all you like - but its simply a percentage play inside the 5m as when done smartly the outcome is almost always try or penalty (in which you can spin it under advantage).

Spin it without that fail safe and the outcome can be a coin flip if the defense is good or the passes are shit.
Other teams don't persist in it. I can understand having a few goes, suck in the defence. Then you've got to roll the dice and have a crack!
The status quo clearly isn't working, it's not entertaining and it's not winning tests. Get it out the back FFS!
 

Yoda

Alan Cameron (40)
Other teams don't persist in it. I can understand having a few goes, suck in the defence. Then you've got to roll the dice and have a crack!
The status quo clearly isn't working, it's not entertaining and it's not winning tests. Get it out the back FFS!
Yes! Agree 100%.
 

Tomthumb

John Thornett (49)
Other teams don't persist in it. I can understand having a few goes, suck in the defence. Then you've got to roll the dice and have a crack!
The status quo clearly isn't working, it's not entertaining and it's not winning tests. Get it out the back FFS!
Yeah the whole point of pick & go's are to generate quick ruck ball, draw the defense in and on the back foot then use the space it creates

We seem to just pick and go with zero purpose behind it
 

JRugby2

Arch Winning (36)
Yeah the whole point of pick & go's are to generate quick ruck ball, draw the defense in and on the back foot then use the space it creates

We seem to just pick and go with zero purpose behind it
Or score tries and generate penalties... like we've done several times this year.

Spreading the ball just because we've had a few cracks without success is bush league stuff.
 
Last edited:

KOB1987

Tim Horan (67)
Regardless, while Len is better then Paisami, as has been discussed elsewhere it was other aspects of the game that led to the defeat, most crucially errant kicking and isolation/ineffective cleanouts. Even if Len played and we scraped away with a win, those aspects would still be there, everyone would have been patting each other on the backs about the victory and it would sugar coat a poor performance. Hopefully the loss has led to a deep dive on these wider issues throughout the camp.
 

rugbyAU

Peter Johnson (47)
Regardless, while Len is better then Paisami, as has been discussed elsewhere it was other aspects of the game that led to the defeat, most crucially errant kicking and isolation/ineffective cleanouts. Even if Len played and we scraped away with a win, those aspects would still be there, everyone would have been patting each other on the backs about the victory and it would sugar coat a poor performance. Hopefully the loss has led to a deep dive on these wider issues throughout the camp.
This has been said many times over the years
 

John S

Ken Catchpole (46)
Yep, agree that there's something with possibly the systems - we're not seeing similar issues in the north (well, maybe Wales), or in NZ. We do also have a bigger player drain than other nations given our sporting context.
 
Top