Waratahs 2020
- Thread starter RugbyReg
- Start date
Standard rule, if someone maybe required to be defend in court the company's "core values", don't let the HR department write it, and get it vetted by your legal team
Brumby Runner
David Wilson (68)
And subject to regular review as HR personnel come and go bringing the latest fads along with them.
I don't really see what HR has to do with this.
We're talking about a situation where there is a complete breakdown in the relationship and the employer has lost control of the employee who is actively damaging the public reputation of the employer.
Fatprop seems to be insinuating a situation where the employer and employee are otherwise enjoying a good working relationship and HR is saying that they've got to be fired because they breached a policy that they came up with.
We're talking about a situation where there is a complete breakdown in the relationship and the employer has lost control of the employee who is actively damaging the public reputation of the employer.
Fatprop seems to be insinuating a situation where the employer and employee are otherwise enjoying a good working relationship and HR is saying that they've got to be fired because they breached a policy that they came up with.
Jimmy_Crouch
Ken Catchpole (46)
He went Springfield HS then IGS before heading over to NZ to finish school. Not sure if he was born here.
Froggy
John Solomon (38)
Fatprop, it depends very much on what the post said, and what happened next. Let's take your Glencore example. If a player posts 'I believe coal mining is damaging the planet, and would like the government to put a moratorium on new mines' would be regarded very differently to 'Burning coal is killing people, coal miners are effectively murderers and should be jailed'
Secondly, if the player who made the second statement was counselled, and told that accusing people going about their quite legal daily work of a serious criminal offence was not acceptable, and to do so again could result in possible termination, the counselling was recorded in writing and signed by the offending player to the effect that he had received this warning, then yes, should he re-offend he may be terminated.
I would think the player who made the first statement would be just reminded that Glencore were paying his wages, he is free to have his beliefs, but just keep his posts civil and respectful of all concerned.
Secondly, if the player who made the second statement was counselled, and told that accusing people going about their quite legal daily work of a serious criminal offence was not acceptable, and to do so again could result in possible termination, the counselling was recorded in writing and signed by the offending player to the effect that he had received this warning, then yes, should he re-offend he may be terminated.
I would think the player who made the first statement would be just reminded that Glencore were paying his wages, he is free to have his beliefs, but just keep his posts civil and respectful of all concerned.
Pfitzy
George Gregan (70)
In good news: I've been elected* Division 5 & 6 Delegate for Suburban Rugby. My rise to the top has commenced, and it will only be a matter of time before I am CEO of both the Waratahs, NSW Rugby, and Rugby Australia.
*unopposed, I might add. There were others, but once they heard I was standing, they ran in fear. No idea why they were giggling. Hysterical fear, I suppose.
*unopposed, I might add. There were others, but once they heard I was standing, they ran in fear. No idea why they were giggling. Hysterical fear, I suppose.
Adam84
Nick Farr-Jones (63)
Which private school and uni did you attend?
That’s the number 1 pre-requisite on Australian Rugby Job applications
You have my congratulations, and pity (for getting to sit in what could be nail-pulling meetings).
When you ascend the throne as Grand Poo-Bah of Rugby, remember those of us who tolerated you for so long and pretended to like you!
Pfitzy
George Gregan (70)
Pfitzy
George Gregan (70)
formerflanker
Ken Catchpole (46)
Importantly, which wine will you be quaffing at the "meetings"?
Pfitzy
George Gregan (70)
150 lashes. And I'll probably have to bring my own, given they served VB last time
formerflanker
Ken Catchpole (46)
BYO certainly reduces any opportunities for Suzie to wield her poisonous ways against you.
formerflanker
Ken Catchpole (46)
But in the name of all that's holy, why on earth would he seriously want that? It defies all logic.