Hang on a minute here.....I don't remember "Stinger" Rea separating either the Senior players or franchise management in any of his statement. In fact, he says stuff like "in the wood" and the "whole organization". This means EVERYBODY. I got the strong feeling that just because Gits had the microphone under his nose didn't rule him out of the spray, and Stinger actually says something like "he's still entitled to be proud of 100 caps", implying that otherwise he should be taking the wrap equally......Can he stop this? How? His boss before him couldn't - it got him boned. The last power Stinger has left is to tell the truth to the world. And he does. Disclaimer: I have little (a few odds and ends) inside knowledge to inform the above - it's about as much as anyone in this thread. But in my experience of a few similar lunatic organisations, it fits.
Thanks Gagger. A counter ruck, if I may:
- IMO, the now famous spray was overwhelmingly an attack on the whole player group, and all in public, the references to other parties were way less prominent;
- My take upon the Gits references was very different; in fact, there were Rea statements to the effect that the players were letting Gits down (amusingly as if the Captain and most senior player (whom we all recall left the Brumbies when convenient for greater riches in the West) would have no impact at all upon these negative outcomes and attitude problems);
- IMO (and as I posted this throughout 2010, along with my then view that the ACTRU badly needed a QRU-like major cleanout), Friend was a second-rate coach that should have either been dropped at the end of the last (poor) 2010 season, or dropped at the end of this one, dropping him early this season was just a another symptom of the Brumbies' dysfunctionality syndrome. Friend seems to be being re-sanctified now in retrospect and in look-back sympathy, but the results achieved on his watch don't justify same;
- Both Friend and Rea absolutely took their jobs on knowing full well the nature of the Brumbies' dysfunctionality re player power, messy Board, etc. Everybody within 1,000 kms knows of that, by repute or directly, for a least the last 3-5 years this has been true. Painting them now as the poor, lost victims of all this is touching, but they fully knew the go there, the risks for coaches in that unwell hot-house were foretold;
- my core belief - as person and manager and fan - is that when a coach attacks _all_ of his players in public, it is the final admission of a systemic failure in the total business/RU/management/Board. When no CEO, Board member or such stands up and at least to some degree absolves all of the players as whipping-boys, I find that utterly reprehensible. Things are that way not because the the players are intrinsically flawed, lazy, weak (as Rea inferred), but because there has been a deep failure of senior RU leadership over many years, and thus the players have either been mis-selected, poorly trained, poorly motivated, harassed with negative not positive input, poorly organised, and poorly communicated with, or, typically in such situations, all of the above. Virtually none of this is their fault (as a total group compromising old and young, and new, etc). If some are there through mis-selection or are not cutting it, they should have been privately counselled and and/or culled by management long before this. So, I hate the public humiliation of _all_ players when 90% of the blame should be laid at the feet of leadership, and, potentially, the over-indulged senior player leadership (comprising known players that many fans here want to see in the Wallabies, just as btw.)
So, IMO your assessment is over-sympathetic and over-indulgent of Rea (and, inferentially, Friend btw). But my main points concerned the entire management system of the ACTRU - the low dark day of the Rea spray has been in the making for years.
[A PS: I know that my system-wide views on leadership calibre will and does upset some fans (and you and numerous mods class it as 'boring and repetitive' and, today I gather, just 'white noise'), but I see poor RU Board governance, low management quality and related mediocre coaching skill and depth as at the very heart of Australian rugby's generally mediocre and silently declining status as a proud, vibrant sporting code in Australia. Once these problems are systemically corrected, our code will commence dynamic regrowth and return to strategic success - just as the next-gen, 'working prototype' of a modern rugby success model is showing in QLD today]