1. Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums. As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.

70 weeks for eye gouging

Discussion in 'Rugby Discussion' started by Jethro Tah, Jan 20, 2010.

  1. Jethro Tah Bob Loudon (25)

    Likes Received:
    175
    http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/u...d-for-70-weeks-for-gouging-20100120-mk1z.html

    Stade Francais prop David Attoub has been hit with a mammoth 70 week-ban from rugby union for eye gouging.

    The ban, which has been backdated to start on December 18, means the Frenchman cannot play rugby again until April 22, 2011 ruling him out of the remainder of the current European season and most of next term's campaign.

    It is the second-most severe suspension to have been handed out for a gouging offence in the professional era, exceeded only by the two-year ban handed to Richard Nones, a prop with French club Colomiers, in 1999.

    Attoub, 28, was cited for gouging Ulster lock Stephen Ferris during a stormy European Cup clash on December 12 in Belfast that the Irish province won 23-13.

    Eye gouging is regarded as one of the worst acts of foul play in the 15-man game and the International Rugby Board (IRB), the sport's global governing body, have instructed disciplinary authorities to come down hard on those found guilty of the offence.

    Judge Jeff Blackett, the disciplinary supremo at England's Rugby Football Union (RFU), who heard Attoub's case said it was the IRB directive and the player's previous history of gouging that saw him impose a penalty which could end the forward's career.

    Blackett, who found Attoub guilty of the offence on Friday but only passed sentence when the disciplinary hearing reconvened on Monday, determined his action was "in the top-end in the level of seriousness for an offence of contact with the eye/eye area".

    Attoub had previously been suspended for contact with the eye/eye area in a European match in the 2004/05 season,

    In a statement issued on Tuesday, Blackett said: "This is the worst act of contact with the eyes that I have had to deal with: it is a case of deliberate eye gouging."

    The initial hearing on December 18 was adjourned until January 15 to allow for more evidence to be gathered after doubts were cast on the veracity of photographs which showed the incident.

    But Blackett's ruling made clear he accepted the images were genuine and he delivered a damning indictment of Attoub's conduct.

    "When he was shown the incriminating photographs and asked to explain what he saw or what was happening he replied that he did not know," Blackett said. "He refused to accept the possibility that his finger was in the eye.

    "It was this evasiveness which satisfied me that his account was less than truthful and that he knew that he had deliberately attacked the eyes of an opponent but was trying to evade responsibility."

    The ban follows a 24-week ban given to Attoub's team-mate and scrum-half Julien Dupuy who also gouged Ferris in the same match.

    Dupuy, who began the year as a starter in the French international lineup, appealed but his ban was only cut by a week.

    The severity of the punishments handed out to the Stade duo follows a crackdown in part caused by the furore over the mere eight-week ban on South Africa flanker Schalk Burger for gouging British and Irish Lions wing Luke Fitzgerald during last year's second Test in Pretoria.

    Max Guazzini, the club president of Paris-based Stade Francais, said Attoub would appeal against his ban.


    IMO - harsh but fair. Dupuy's gouge was far worse yet with a shorter ban due to lack of track record. On this precedent if he, or Burger for that matter, is caught again they would be out for a long time.
  2. Pfitzy Tim Horan (67)

    Likes Received:
    7,530
    I've no idea what motivates these guys. Talking to one of the Kiwis at our club who played a bit over there, he said its largely cultural that there is a biff and deliberate foul play at the bottom of rucks, but jeez by the time you get to the pro ranks you'd think they'd learn better.
  3. Biffo Ken Catchpole (46)

    Likes Received:
    242
    Yes, Justice 9 would have been 50-60 weeks and Justice 6 would have been 40-50 weeks.
  4. Moses Simon Poidevin (60)

    Likes Received:
    1,567
    Justice 4 Attoub? Probably, 70 weeks sets a good precadent.
  5. Thomond78 Colin Windon (37)

    Likes Received:
    123
    Ferris' evidence was that Dupuy, while looking bad, was just a slap and a hand in the face. Could have gone in the eye, reckless, but didn't.

    His evidence of what Attoub did, which is on the ERC website, is sickening. I'll grab it and post it later.
  6. Lindommer Steve Williams (59)

    Likes Received:
    3,746
    Will this change the French attitude towards eye-gouging? I hope so.
  7. naza Alan Cameron (40)

    Likes Received:
    387
    Now they've just got to stop the Welsh from todger pulling and ball twisting.
  8. Scarfman Knitter of the Scarf

    Likes Received:
    1,533
    And the Australians from hair dyeing and straightening. Now that's sickening.

    Seriously someone, video evidence please.
  9. Biffo Ken Catchpole (46)

    Likes Received:
    242
    Would verbal evidence from their hairdressers be enough?

Share This Page