Broadcast options for Australian Rugby
- Thread starter WorkingClassRugger
- Start date
p.Tah
John Thornett (49)
There has been some discussion about IPTV on here. Good to see SANZAR are considering it as part of the broadcast mix as well as free to air TV:
http://www.smh.com.au/business/free...wing-super-rugby-audience-20140307-34cpv.html
Also in today's SMH an article on the emergence and importance of IPTV for Australian codes.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/view...-broadcasting-gamechanger-20140307-34cq0.html
http://www.smh.com.au/business/free...wing-super-rugby-audience-20140307-34cpv.html
Also in today's SMH an article on the emergence and importance of IPTV for Australian codes.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/view...-broadcasting-gamechanger-20140307-34cq0.html
kiap
Steve Williams (59)
Check this out (via lexpat – thanks) – rugby filmed by a drone:
http://translate.google.com/transla...laires-match-rugby-filme-drone-0703141853.php
lexpat said:
http://translate.google.com/transla...laires-match-rugby-filme-drone-0703141853.php
Badger
Bill McLean (32)
If the ARU can't get Super Rugby on FTA, would it be feasible to online stream one game live each week?
wamberal
Phil Kearns (64)
It would be feasible, but obviously it would be part of the overall negotiations, because any kind of dissemination of the games has a value.
I have been thinking about the whole question of FTA coverage of Soup.
Foxtel's main driver is subscriptions, so we are told. Advertising revenues are secondary.
Surely it might be possible for the next negotiations to include a simulcast of one game a week on Australian FTA. Or, alternatively, a clause to allow/require Fox Sports to sell the rights to one game a week on FTA (the game to be chosen by the ARU).
FTA would only be interested if:
1. The chosen game involved at least one Australian franchise.
2. The game could be televised live (perhaps "on delay" to allow advertising, a la Channel Nine's Sunday afternoon broadcast).
3. A game would be available every week, at the same time. My pick would be 4 pm Saturday afternoon, on the basis that this time could work for both New Zealand and Australian based matches. Plus there seems little point going up against the loig on Sunday arvo, better to go against the AFL.
One game a week would surely not impact on Foxtel subscriptions. In fact, in might be argued that having a game on FTA might encourage more subscriptions, from people who realise that the events are worth watching, and to watch them all you have to subscribe to Foxtel.
The fee paid by FTA could be transferred to Fox Sports/Foxtel. Who cares? The only thing that really matters is getting our product onto FTA.
I should have added the obvious caveat that our partner unions would have to be willing to cooperate, so that the schedule could be tailored to meet our needs. That should not be a huge problem. NZ franchises currently start games as early as 2 pm their time and of course our franchises should welcome an occasional Saturday afternoon game.
WorkingClassRugger
David Codey (61)
p.Tah
John Thornett (49)
TEN are looking for what they call 'event' TV. At the top end of the spectrum it's Bledisloe Cups, Grand Finals etc events that people know will be on at a specific time and will make an effort to tune into. It boosts audience numbers and helps sponsors plan copromotion events.
If they were to become involved in Super Rugby, the game(s), as Wamberal says, would need to be on at the same time each week. I'm not so sure that game has to have an Aussie team, I think NZ derbies would rate well... Especially considering how many of them live here.
If they were to become involved in Super Rugby, the game(s), as Wamberal says, would need to be on at the same time each week. I'm not so sure that game has to have an Aussie team, I think NZ derbies would rate well... Especially considering how many of them live here.
WorkingClassRugger
David Codey (61)
Well, essentially there are games on at set time slots. Most Fridays we have a 5:30 game and a 7:30 game and usually the same on Saturday. We could do it as part of the negotiations. SA get a 6th team for us to have a number of set games in advantageous time zones.
I also agree. I don't think it necessarily needs to be games with Aus teams involved. People want to see entertainment and the NZ derbies and game tend to be that.
wamberal
Phil Kearns (64)
Died in the wool rugby supporters would watch any rugby. We need to attract people who are not died in the wool. The starting point has to be games in which at least one Australian team is involved, IMHO.
I hate to say it, but if people want "entertainment", they probably won't watch rugby, unless they are diehard fans.
Scoey
Tony Shaw (54)
I've moved this over here from the Reds v Stormers game thread.
I don't mean to hijack this thread (so if anyone can point me to a better thread to post in I would appreciate it) BUT, this is very alarming!
From the Foxtel TV Guide on Sat night 6:30pm (AEST):
FoxSports1 - Live NRL (Bulldogs v Storm)
FoxSports2 - Live A League (Melb V v Syd FC)
FoxSports3 - Live AFL (Fremantle v Gold Coast)
FoxFooty - Live AFL (Sydney v Collingwood)
SPEEDHD - Live: To Be Advised
So from the tweet above we can clearly see that in the eyes of Foxtel, our game rates below the three main other codes and is listed as "TBA". It should be noted that at 9:30pm on FS3 the Reds v Stormers games is listed as being televised 'Live' which it of course won't be - it will be a replay.
Apart from the obvious issue with this, a big concern for me is that any casual observers at home on Sat night looking for some contact sport to watch, won't find the Rugby that is on if they are anything like me. If I'm looking for something to watch I check what is on FS1, 2 & 3, then check Eurosport and if nothing's on any of them I might check ESPN, but I don't think I have ever had a look to see what is on Speed.
Man what a shot in the nuts!!! Whoever does the bargaining for Rugby's TV Deals is clearly a half wit at best.
/rant
I don't mean to hijack this thread (so if anyone can point me to a better thread to post in I would appreciate it) BUT, this is very alarming!
From the Foxtel TV Guide on Sat night 6:30pm (AEST):
FoxSports1 - Live NRL (Bulldogs v Storm)
FoxSports2 - Live A League (Melb V v Syd FC)
FoxSports3 - Live AFL (Fremantle v Gold Coast)
FoxFooty - Live AFL (Sydney v Collingwood)
SPEEDHD - Live: To Be Advised
So from the tweet above we can clearly see that in the eyes of Foxtel, our game rates below the three main other codes and is listed as "TBA". It should be noted that at 9:30pm on FS3 the Reds v Stormers games is listed as being televised 'Live' which it of course won't be - it will be a replay.
Apart from the obvious issue with this, a big concern for me is that any casual observers at home on Sat night looking for some contact sport to watch, won't find the Rugby that is on if they are anything like me. If I'm looking for something to watch I check what is on FS1, 2 & 3, then check Eurosport and if nothing's on any of them I might check ESPN, but I don't think I have ever had a look to see what is on Speed.
Man what a shot in the nuts!!! Whoever does the bargaining for Rugby's TV Deals is clearly a half wit at best.
/rant
WorkingClassRugger
David Codey (61)
I hope this is some sort of sick joke. Relegate the damn A-League to Speed TV as in terms of ratings it rates the lowest of the four.
spikhaza
John Solomon (38)
This stinks. When you purchase foxtel and fox1, 2 & 3 you expect to have the live super rugby rights correct? that is what they advertise, live and exclusive!!!!
Therefore anything to the contrary falls under section 18 of the Australian Consumer law - Misleading and deceptive conduct?
Therefore anything to the contrary falls under section 18 of the Australian Consumer law - Misleading and deceptive conduct?
Mate. You better call the Australian Federal Police again.
After last weekend I'm assuming you have them on speed dial.
WorkingClassRugger
David Codey (61)
That's actually a very good question. I might consult my text on that. One thing that will be happening is a very angry phone call.
Scoey
Tony Shaw (54)
It is still live, it's just on a channel that anyone not in the know, will struggle to find, so in that respect you are still getting what you pay for by subscribing to Foxtel Sports package.
AFL has it's own channel, yet it is getting a second game played on FS3. So either they have a stronger (or better worded) contract in terms of their broadcast deal, they simply have more pull with FoxSports or it rates better so FoxSports has simply taken a decision to play both AFL games as a priority. It's worth noting that the AFL game on FS3 is also being shown live on FTA (Ch 73).
If the ratings are the issue though, I fail to see why the A-League game is given priority over Rugby so it is more likely one of the other two.
It is pretty apparent that on a night with a heap of footy on, where Rugby is seen to be sitting in the pecking order. Not a good look for us.
AFL has it's own channel, yet it is getting a second game played on FS3. So either they have a stronger (or better worded) contract in terms of their broadcast deal, they simply have more pull with FoxSports or it rates better so FoxSports has simply taken a decision to play both AFL games as a priority. It's worth noting that the AFL game on FS3 is also being shown live on FTA (Ch 73).
If the ratings are the issue though, I fail to see why the A-League game is given priority over Rugby so it is more likely one of the other two.
It is pretty apparent that on a night with a heap of footy on, where Rugby is seen to be sitting in the pecking order. Not a good look for us.