• Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums. As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.

Japan vs Wallabies, Nissan Stadium, Yokohama, Sat 4th Nov 4.40pm AEST

Status
Not open for further replies.

Up the Guts

Steve Williams (59)
I expect them to spank us at twickers as well, this is a really, really good English side
Sorry just can't agree with this. Call me optimistic but I expect us to give them a real run for their money at Twickenham. Last time we played them we just slung it from side to side and had no real go forward. I think our forward pack right now is shaping up to be world class and we will damage them up the middle.
 

Inside Shoulder

Nathan Sharpe (72)
There was always going to be a first time where it happened. At least in this situation they've had the week to prepare for it with that as the plan and have also had a lot more of the season working on it in training. Maybe doing it at the back end of one of the Pumas tests could have been an option but those games were close for a long time.

It would be a plan to let him play at 10 without starting him there: he could have played there last week: clearly getting his stars injured didn't worry Cheika or he would not have played the previous week's man of the match.
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
Sorry just can't agree with this. Call me optimistic but I expect us to give them a real run for their money at Twickenham. Last time we played them we just slung it from side to side and had no real go forward. I think our forward pack right now is shaping up to be world class and we will damage them up the middle.


Love your optimism. Which world class forward pack would you pick?
 

Tomikin

Simon Poidevin (60)
We beat, the all blacks two games back we can beat Japan and We can beat England at, Twickenham.. Carn Wallabies

Sent from my HTC 2PS6200 using Tapatalk
 

Up the Guts

Steve Williams (59)
Love your optimism. Which world class forward pack would you pick?

On paper, man for man, England is better right now but the way things are going in a couple of years time this could well change. I also think there's enough talent in our forward pack as it is that if things click then we will take it to them in Twickenham. Some of the handling skills and offload work of our forwards has been outstanding lately. If our pigs can string a few passes together like they have been our forward runners we will so be much more effective than we were last time we played them.
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
Sorry just can't agree with this. Call me optimistic but I expect us to give them a real run for their money at Twickenham. Last time we played them we just slung it from side to side and had no real go forward. I think our forward pack right now is shaping up to be world class and we will damage them up the middle.


I hope I am wrong
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
There is no doubt that there are some shoots of green in some aspects of our forward play.


But. We still do not have an 8 who can mix it with the Dodgers. Or a 6, although DEmpsey might be the answer.


Our front row is errrr fragile at the set piece, it all depends on the ref. And if Hooper gets injured, what next, exactly?
 

Derpus

George Gregan (70)
It would be a plan to let him play at 10 without starting him there: he could have played there last week: clearly getting his stars injured didn't worry Cheika or he would not have played the previous week's man of the match.

You're being intentionally obtuse. Dempsey barely played all year and was improving with every second on the field. He didn't need a rest.
 

Derpus

George Gregan (70)
There is no doubt that there are some shoots of green in some aspects of our forward play.


But. We still do not have an 8 who can mix it with the Dodgers. Or a 6, although DEmpsey might be the answer.


Our front row is errrr fragile at the set piece, it all depends on the ref. And if Hooper gets injured, what next, exactly?

Is that possible? I guess as of next year Pocock, maybe Hardwick.
 
T

TOCC

Guest
I don't believe I am, having also addressed general kicking among other things.... But to tragic's specific point about goal kicking - it really wasn't a deciding factor in the end as even if Foley had have converted all of his goals it wouldn't have mattered .

He said kicking(not just goal kicking) was a major factor that negatively influenced the outcome, that much is true..
 

Dismal Pillock

Simon Poidevin (60)
171102_japan_member-731x1024.jpg


looks like a fairly good side.


In fact, if we still had AVATAR BETS I7d fancy a punt on them...


ps HAHAHAHA AVATAR BETS HAHAHNA. THE THOUGHT OF IT NOW HAHAHA OH GOD

laugh.gif
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
 

Brumby Runner

David Wilson (68)
Chill fellas, I not a Chuckles fan by any stretch of the imagination, true I wouldn't of gone into tour without 2 proper 10s, but if he doesn't feel there one that is capable of stepping up at this stage, I can almost understand saying, well let's give Hodge a crack, if it doesn't work he can be moved back to wing or whatever without the mental damage I think throwing in a rookie that is not ready, they tend not to recover their confidence.

And what about our mental damage Dan if Foley doesn't return or gets injured or sick later in the tour?
 

Shelby Trappey

Frank Row (1)
I dunno how this nessesarily plays out but this japanes side has at least 4 player who I think are arguably the equivalent or superior to their wallaby counterparts... namely:

6-Lietch
8-Mafi
9-Tanaka and
14-Lemeki

I don’t we’ll lose but hopefully this turns into an entertaining close game because both teams are playing good rugby.

Also keep your mind on Japan’s 7 Nunomaki. He’s put in good efforts in a lot Sunwolves games this year. My understanding is he was a St. Bede’s (NZ) First XV and Canterbury schoolboy rep player before taking a scholarship to return to Japan and play University and obviously eventually professional rugby.
 

tragic

John Solomon (38)
Actually, in the first test it would've made it a 5 point ball game.... he missed 3 conversions and we lost by 11 points.
And your stats were wrong - Farrell kicked 9/10 (3/3 conv and 6/7 pen), soooooooooooooo....

Stats might have been be a bit off but the exact stats push the point even further.
 

tragic

John Solomon (38)
I don't believe I am, having also addressed general kicking among other things.... But to tragic's specific point about goal kicking - it really wasn't a deciding factor in the end as even if Foley had have converted all of his goals it wouldn't have mattered as England still scored significantly more points than us, and if we're going to go down the murky path of 'what ifs' then Farrell also missed a penalty goal. The fact that we gave away so many penalties within kicking range was a far bigger issue.

It's hard not to infringe when you are trapped on your line for phase after phase with no exit strategy.
Yes our discipline was poor but our complete lack of an exit strategy put us in that position.
And that all came down to terrible kicking options.
Anyway I've said enough.
Time to rule whatever it is myself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top