Lee Grant said:
Interesting - some people thought that Gits was the worst yet he got 8/10 from one Pom journalist - the highest score except for Genia 9/10.
The lowest mark was 5/10 for Quade. I thought he went OK.
Yeah, I read that pom journalist's opinion yesterday. More evidence to support my theory that some journos are so lazy that they write their reviews before the game.
There are two problems with many people issuing ratings: (1) they frequently don't know what ratings are (2) they don't have a definition of the standard represented by each numeral.
I don't want to get into too much nit-picking on the matter of Quade, but I thought he was better than OK. I thought he was good, verging on very good.