• Welcome to the Green and Gold Rugby forums. As you can see we've upgraded the forums to new software. Your old logon details should work, just click the 'Login' button in the top right.

The Israel Folau saga

Status
Not open for further replies.

Quick Hands

David Wilson (68)
So Jones, who is gay, loves it when Izzy bashes the gays? wft. I'm confused. Where is Jones whole statement so I can reword it to my liking.

You shouldn't be confused, because defending rights includes defending the rights of people who you either don't like or don't agree with.

So an openly gay MP (Moana Pasifika) defended Israel Folau as well.

Liberal MP (Moana Pasifika) Tim Wilson defends Israel Folau’s right to air his views

Israel Folau has found support in an unlikely place; from gay Liberal MP (Moana Pasifika) Tim Wilson, who has issued a warning to Rugby Australia.
https://www.news.com.au/sport/rugby...s/news-story/fc021b31d9e379b8b26f2cedb20c5a27
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
Interesting that asic in its media release choice of words for terminating IF as brand ambassador is his social media posts made his position as ‘untenable’ which is interesting as in players voice article IF used the same word as what would make him walk away from rugby.
 

KOB1987

John Eales (66)

haha

not disputing it's relevance if true but I'm wondering if it would have got the same airtime from you if it instead said this:

It is understood Folau was grilled for hours at a time by the panel and RA’s legal team and he spoke from the heart.

The Australian understands Folau told the room he would have no hesitation posting a similar religious view again, which aligns with the fact he has not taken down the Instagram post in 28 days.
 

Dismal Pillock

David Codey (61)
The main takeaway I have from that article is that Will Genia is MASSIVE:

c1acf1bf63972469a4404c93b1bcfc88
 

formerflanker

Ken Catchpole (46)
Add them to the list - Alan Jones, Mark Latham, Andrew Bolt, Miranda Devine.....

You better add Nick Farr-Jones to that list.
Just gave a powerful performance on the Bolt Report, including his view that Israel gave no verbal undertakings to stop speaking his Christian beliefs. This was supported by the story of Castle giving a press statement that was at odds with what they had discussed.
Importantly, Izzy signed his recent contract assuming he continued to have the freedom to express his religious views.
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
haha

not disputing it's relevance if true but I'm wondering if it would have got the same airtime from you if it instead said this:

It is understood Folau was grilled for hours at a time by the panel and RA’s legal team and he spoke from the heart.



The Australian understands Folau told the room he would have no hesitation posting a similar religious view again, which aligns with the fact he has not taken down the Instagram post in 28 days.
Sadly which is why If has to go!
 

KOB1987

John Eales (66)
Sadly which is why If has to go!

I don't disagree if it's true and in context. Which it now appears not to be, not in context at least, with Farr Jones' comments it seems it was in the context that he gave no undertakings not to in the first place. Seems Fairfax might be twisting this one a little bit ;)
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
You shouldn't be confused, because defending rights includes defending the rights of people who you either don't like or don't agree with.

So an openly gay MP (Moana Pasifika) defended Israel Folau as well.

Liberal MP (Moana Pasifika) Tim Wilson defends Israel Folau’s right to air his views

Israel Folau has found support in an unlikely place; from gay Liberal MP (Moana Pasifika) Tim Wilson, who has issued a warning to Rugby Australia.
https://www.news.com.au/sport/rugby...s/news-story/fc021b31d9e379b8b26f2cedb20c5a27

My bet is all of this debate is exactly what IF had in mind as for me this happening just after he posted leading try scorer status in super rugby too convenient. Personally I think now more than ever time to cut him as we don’t need evangelists in rugby trying promoting their own personal agendas. Thanks for coming Israel but be good outside of your personal agenda you found the time to exit as sacrificing the future of rugby in this country vs your own personal agenda I will choose the former thanks.
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
No, I'm not wrong, and you'd definitely have recourse through the courts.
Suggest you read again what posted as I was stating what a big corporate employer would do and mate this ain’t wrong but general consensus view. If you have worked for a large corporate and able to provide a different view all good but at this point you have provided a answer to my comments you clearly have not understood.

My post was not about courts view but modern day corporate view so please respond to the correct context my posts were put in please.
 

Set piece magic

John Solomon (38)
Freedom of speech mate. The bedrock of our civilization.

Fun to facetiously joke about freedom of speech on a forum but I’m sure you wouldn’t be cackling if you were in a re-education camp in Red China, or evading Putin’s gangsters in Russia, or flat out starving in North Korea aye

Bedrock for a reason and pretty important, despite a lot of people here forgetting why it’s pretty important
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
I don't disagree if it's true and in context. Which it now appears not to be, not in context at least, with Farr Jones' comments it seems it was in the context that he gave no undertakings not to in the first place. Seems Fairfax might be twisting this one a little bit ;)

Yeh relying on media dangerous as whoever in media let the facts get in the way of a good story that sells - would trust the Coc process more then I trust the media!!!!!
 

Dctarget

John Eales (66)
Fun to facetiously joke about freedom of speech on a forum but I’m sure you wouldn’t be cackling if you were in a re-education camp in Red China, or evading Putin’s gangsters in Russia, or flat out starving in North Korea aye

Bedrock for a reason and pretty important, despite a lot of people here forgetting why it’s pretty important

Absolutely bizarre comment.
 

Quick Hands

David Wilson (68)
Suggest you read again what posted as I was stating what a big corporate employer would do and mate this ain’t wrong but general consensus view. If you have worked for a large corporate and able to provide a different view all good but at this point you have provided a answer to my comments you clearly have not understood.

My post was not about courts view but modern day corporate view so please respond to the correct context my posts were put in please.

I'm not going to get into a ridiculous tit for tat with you. Go back a read the post which I posted first - I was talking about the courts. So you you respond to a post about the courts with a post about big corporate employers and complain when I go back to the original point? Really? Maybe you should take your own advice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top