Patience. @Ace Ventura would be working on this now.
NSW AAGPS 2025
- Thread starter Joker
- Start date
ScrumThingSpecial
Frank Row (1)
Shore displayed a great start to the game going up 12-0 after two fast tries. But Scott’s stayed in the fight and of the back of the scrum I believe the 13 scored two individual tries. Shores forwards were dominant in set piece and ball carrying, however Scott’s backs kept finding holes in shores defensive line
PickandDriveThru80
Allen Oxlade (6)
Is this 16As?
ScrumThingSpecial
Frank Row (1)
The Ruckman
Stan Wickham (3)
Random ahh post
Ace Ventura
Larry Dwyer (12)
PickandDriveThru80
Allen Oxlade (6)
@Ace Ventura 15as 20-0 shores way
PickandDriveThru80
Allen Oxlade (6)
@Ace Ventura 13as 35-15 shores way
Ace Ventura
Larry Dwyer (12)
Thanks to those who submitted scores - this is a first: Results and Tables complete on game day. Well done!
StillPlYing
Frank Row (1)
Very minor correction to 13As - correct score:
Kings 15
Riverview 5
Cheers for compiling the tables. Great day of footy.
Kings 15
Riverview 5
Cheers for compiling the tables. Great day of footy.
footyhead10
Bob McCowan (2)
I am disgusted by the actions of Scot’s number 5 and cannot say I am suprised given my personal expiernenes with tsc
Ace Ventura
Larry Dwyer (12)
thanks SPY. We are completely in the hands of the well-intentioned members of this forum to report scores, and another member reported Kings 26-5. So do I toss a coin?
[I'll change it, but won't repost the corrected scores and tables until next week]
pushhthatscrummm
Bob McCowan (2)
Im getting mixed understandings of this blokes actions, is there anything on streamer what has he truely done. Have we come to a consensus
Regards Scrummie
What a round, just want to higlight Rory O'Connor who I believe is the form player of the competition as of right now. Has he got another year next year at Joeys? Looks a very big frame, who can move well with a very good skillset. Could be looking at a very big future.
Elsewhere, Julian Minto continues to shine, and is in my opinion, the best player in his year in the country. Very excited to see what he can do with the rest of his season, as well as the next two years of his schoolboy rugby.
Finally, anyone else think Heinz is a bit wasted at 12? Didn't get as involved from a carrying perspective, especially off first phase which is where Scots seemed to use him a lot last week. Scots a team who look very flawed in structure, but wow they are arguably the best team in out of structure play - a number of freakish individual talents who can seem to make nothing out of something. In contrast to last week, where I believe they were unlucky to lose, I would say this week they were lucky to win - very clutch from Oscar Tremlett.
Elsewhere, Julian Minto continues to shine, and is in my opinion, the best player in his year in the country. Very excited to see what he can do with the rest of his season, as well as the next two years of his schoolboy rugby.
Finally, anyone else think Heinz is a bit wasted at 12? Didn't get as involved from a carrying perspective, especially off first phase which is where Scots seemed to use him a lot last week. Scots a team who look very flawed in structure, but wow they are arguably the best team in out of structure play - a number of freakish individual talents who can seem to make nothing out of something. In contrast to last week, where I believe they were unlucky to lose, I would say this week they were lucky to win - very clutch from Oscar Tremlett.
PigSkin
Bob McCowan (2)
This is a copy of a post RUL made in the wrong forum. Was written in the tipping forum. I found it interesting and thought to copy and paste in correct forum.
From RUL
“I started watching school boys rugby again recently, great to watch. Was watching Shore play at Scotts today and the Scotts clock on the scoreboard might need a service? I watched 4 games:
16a's - Shore in front when clock run down. Ref played an extra 5 odd minutes and Scotts scored on the death to win.
3rd's - Shore in front when clock ran down. Shore kicked the ball backwards and out thinking end of the game and ref played on for another 3 -4 minutes (apparently there was 2 seconds left when the ball went out). Scotts scored on the death but was 2 points short of a win.
At the end of this game a mum questioned why the clock ran down and several more plays were allowed in the game. A dad said 'the scoreboard clock keeps running and the ref's watch is what counts'. The ref was right in front of us during this conversation and he did not appear to have a watch?? But he somehow knew there were a few seconds left and yes, I understand that the game can often go longer than the scoreboard clock because of the ref can stop his watch for stoppage of play..
2nd's - Scotts in front with 3 minutes to full time (according to scoreboard clock). Ref called full time with 2.32 left on score board clock ... to give Scotts the win. I really don't understand how the scoreboard clock can still have time on it if it does not stop for play stoppage?
1st's - Shore in front when score board clock was frozen with 2.00 minutes left. I set my timer. Ref allowed another 6 minutes or so from then and Scotts was awarded a penalty in front of the goals - which they kicked and won the game by a point.
It felt like - Scotts behind, play overtime. Scotts in front, shut game down early. I expect the refs are independent (?) so not saying this is the case, but can anyone help explain this or is it just one of Rugby's mysteries.... like scrums.”
From RUL
“I started watching school boys rugby again recently, great to watch. Was watching Shore play at Scotts today and the Scotts clock on the scoreboard might need a service? I watched 4 games:
16a's - Shore in front when clock run down. Ref played an extra 5 odd minutes and Scotts scored on the death to win.
3rd's - Shore in front when clock ran down. Shore kicked the ball backwards and out thinking end of the game and ref played on for another 3 -4 minutes (apparently there was 2 seconds left when the ball went out). Scotts scored on the death but was 2 points short of a win.
At the end of this game a mum questioned why the clock ran down and several more plays were allowed in the game. A dad said 'the scoreboard clock keeps running and the ref's watch is what counts'. The ref was right in front of us during this conversation and he did not appear to have a watch?? But he somehow knew there were a few seconds left and yes, I understand that the game can often go longer than the scoreboard clock because of the ref can stop his watch for stoppage of play..
2nd's - Scotts in front with 3 minutes to full time (according to scoreboard clock). Ref called full time with 2.32 left on score board clock ... to give Scotts the win. I really don't understand how the scoreboard clock can still have time on it if it does not stop for play stoppage?
1st's - Shore in front when score board clock was frozen with 2.00 minutes left. I set my timer. Ref allowed another 6 minutes or so from then and Scotts was awarded a penalty in front of the goals - which they kicked and won the game by a point.
It felt like - Scotts behind, play overtime. Scotts in front, shut game down early. I expect the refs are independent (?) so not saying this is the case, but can anyone help explain this or is it just one of Rugby's mysteries.... like scrums.”