Ok so I have a CASISA Black table here but as much as I would have taken the Red table with a grain of salt, I think you'll need the whole shaker here!
A few notes:
1) I still don't have Pius/Cranbrook results other than 1XV and will update if and when I can find them. I'm assuming that Pius wouldn't have fielded a 15a team against Cranbrook as they haven't all year in ISA.
2) The table is based upon weeks 1 and 3 only. My apologies to Chev, Oxley and Aloys as I know your games went ahead in Week 2.
3) I've split the wins of the 13s and 14s Aloys/Kinross fixtures from the round 3
4) A wet weather round in Black has massive ramifications. Pius and Gregs have been impacted the most here.
5) A red figure means a declined game
| | | | | | | |
---|
CASISA Black | 1XV | 2XV | 16 | 15 | 14 | 13 | Total: |
Trinity | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 32 |
Kinross | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 22 |
Cranbrook (missing rd 3 results) | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 22 |
Aloys | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 18 |
Stannies | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 18 |
Gregs | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14 |
Pius (missing rd 3 results) | 1 | | | 0 | | | 1 |
Chev/Oxley | | | | | | | |
What to make of these results?
Well given the washouts and odd numbered competition format, I don't feel it fair to pass judgement on each schools program. Pius and Gregs have really copped the short end of the stick here but given the structure and the rain, it can't be helped.
Whilst I'm still missing results from Carnbrook/Pius, it's reasonable to suggest that Cranbrook would have won a game or two more and this would see them neck and neck with Trinity for first place and this wouldn't come as a surprise. What is pleasing to see is Kinross finishing in 2nd/3rdish place. The tyranny of distance makes running a Rugby program a real challenge out there and they seem to accept it week in week out without complaint. Congrats to them on this result.