yes here was last years: http://www.cas.nsw.edu.au/cas-u16s-rugby-team-announced/Do they run an U16 CAS team or just opens?
GoR, I have had about a dozen cousins go through View, and 2 nephews there right now, who both play rugby, saw them play Joeys.Big fan. Well done all for doing something and not just taking shots at the GPS for going 2 rounds which overall has been a success for that comp and I don't see it changing.
This is a boost for all Schools Rugby in NSW. Shouldn't say all because I want to see CHS get back to a degree of competitiveness but this a good step.
Mr Snort, by absolute chance, I ran into a Cricket CAS selector at QP who was the driver of this all, it took him many years to work out a plan and put it forward to all the heads. He asked me what I thought, and I told him that I, and MANY/MOST school rugby fans are in absolute favor, he was very happy to hear this feedback, Can't wait for it to see it all happen.Details of the new competition format are here: http://www.cas.nsw.edu.au/cas-announcement-on-combined-rugby-competition-for-2025/
Congratulations to the schools involved for doing something proactive and long overdue!
That's a fair point but the GPS could also argue on the form of the last couple of years the standard and general equality across the comp has lead to a very high standard of Rugby every week. I get the initial argument that a fully tiered comp creates game of equal opposition but you can also see a comp a few years down the track that the higher tiers separate themselves in quality so much you have recreated what already exists...GoR, I have had about a dozen cousins go through View, and 2 nephews there right now, who both play rugby, saw them play Joeys.
I don't think/hope it's not just a case at taking shots at the GPS comp, and we all know you all love your own little home and away comp, but it is and will remain a comp of just 6 schools. We all get the history, but if the plan is to really develop rugby, like NZ, it needs to have a tiered comp.
That doesn't mean you can't play and win your own comp within this framework but home and away and nothing else is living in a bubble.
I get the initial argument that a fully tiered comp creates game of equal opposition but you can also see a comp a few years down the track that the higher tiers separate themselves in quality so much you have recreated what already exists...
You make some good points. I do think Auggies and Oakhill will do very well. The GPS comp was terrific this year as Shore rose from the ashes but that's only 1 year. My point is that the GPS comp could still be played out in a tiered system, so nothing lost, albeit a 1 round comp, which for the vast majority of history has been played that way. Anyway it's all hypothetical as it won't happen.That's a fair point but the GPS could also argue on the form of the last couple of years the standard and general equality across the comp has lead to a very high standard of Rugby every week. I get the initial argument that a fully tiered comp creates game of equal opposition but you can also see a comp a few years down the track that the higher tiers separate themselves in quality so much you have recreated what already exists...
The plan also isn't to develop Rugby necessarily but a competition for the Schools to participate. The fact a lot of professional players come out of it is a nice by-product but the they don't play on the bequest of the NSWRU or RA. In reality these comps take a financial load off Rugby in Aus that they could not afford to maintain otherwise.
I was never making this a good riddince leave the GPS alone post initally. I like this move for the CAS/ISA overall. Will be interesting to see what happens if say Oakhill and Auggies show up and kill it. Besides all those players ending up elsewhere I don't think some of the old heads would like it too much. It's happened before a couple decades ago.
I like this move for the CAS/ISA overall. Will be interesting to see what happens if say Oakhill and Auggies show up and kill it. Besides all those players ending up elsewhere I don't think some of the old heads would like it too much. It's happened before a couple decades ago.
yes I've heard this news quite devastating for the team, has already been out of training for quite some time.UPDATE ON BARKER COLLEGE:
William Hargraeves from the College of Barker has sustained a knee injury after trying to perform a backflip infront of the huzz.
Slight correction DaS, Pats and Pius were never part of the CAS comp in any sport, so they weren't ditched. There was a vote once between the CAS schools to include at least Pats (to the best of my knowledge) but it was knocked back as 1 school voted against it, and it had to be unanimous. They were played a few times in the middle of the CAS comp but they were "trial" matches.This is the great unknown hey. Imagine a scenario where Auggies wins, Oakhill runners up and let's say Stannies (based upon last year's results) come 4th. My big concern is that will be the end of the pragmatism and we'll see a hasty retreat to "pre-war" borders.
There are a multitude of opinions on the following and I'm not challenging any of them other than to say one of the reasons Pat's and Pius where ditched from the briefly expanded CAS was they were a bit too competitive in Rugby and CricketI hate to think cynically but you can only wonder.
It's going to be fascinating one way or the other.
Not sure about that.. there's an old thread somewhere here that contains comments from the era. (Presumably with an earlier WLF account commenting)other than to say one of the reasons Pat's and Pius where ditched from the briefly expanded CAS was they were a bit too competitive in Rugby and Cricket
Yyyyyyyyyep. And every school has pointed to every other school as the culprit for that one vote.Slight correction DaS, Pats and Pius were never part of the CAS comp in any sport, so they weren't ditched. There was a vote once between the CAS schools to include at least Pats (to the best of my knowledge) but it was knocked back as 1 school voted against it, and it had to be unanimous. They were played a few times in the middle of the CAS comp but they were "trial" matches.
Yes you're spot on with the outcome being the formation of ISA and I'd take it a step further and say that without it, you probably wouldn't have seen the development of Greg's, Oakhill and Auggies and it may have spelt the end of Pius. Speculation of course but its unquestionably a good outcome.You need to move on mate!
My 3 oldest brother are Pat's boys, I went to Waverley. Have a deep respect for both schools. My brother played Pat's for the 80-81 teams. Drew 7-7 all in 80 against Waves, and then get smashed 34-7 in 81 on the SCG before the test match - Waves had Kava and the Bourke brothers in that team (no disgrace in that result). Similar result in 83 to Waverley.
I was told by St. Pats people the reason they weren't invited into the CAS was because Barker didn't want to play 2 extra games as that would impact the HSC. I have no idea if that's true but that's what St. Pat's people were saying at the time.
But the good thing about St Pats not being accepted is that they created the ISA. The success of the ISA today isn't because of what Auggies and Oakhill are doing now but the ground work Pat's done in the 90s and 2000s to make that competition what it. If St. Pats were accepted into the CAS back then, I doubt there would be on ISA today. So it's turned out great for school rugby.
Finally, I don't get the angst against CAS schools. Waves have been playing Auggies since 2008, and before that they've always played St Pats up until the 2012 (should still be playing them). Same with Trinity, Knox and Barker against other ISA schools. The GPS schools have barely given you the time of day. I don't get the grudge.
DaS, I actually know which school wasn't in favour, if you wish to know, message me separately I will tell you. But it's not worth dwelling on now.Yyyyyyyyyep. And every school has pointed to every other school as the culprit for that one vote.
Anyway. It's in the past but living in the aftermath of that vote wasn't fun.
I just hope that should it come to pass that if isa has a year or number of years where they dominate that we don't get a similar "we've put it to a vote" bullshit and the whole thing comes crashing down. It would be a backward step.
I went to a CAS school and from what I've seen in the recent years, the ISA program ( depth) will be miles ahead in a few years. no doubt.
The CAS first teams perhaps will be ahead for obvious reasons, but the depth of the main ISA school beats pretty much every CAS school - except Waverley perhaps. Very sad to watch.