And Barker v Waverley will once again have to wait until the final round. The CAS seems to do a good job with their schedulingBUT beware the wounded Wave!
And Barker v Waverley will once again have to wait until the final round. The CAS seems to do a good job with their schedulingBUT beware the wounded Wave!
no one thinks trinity can take the premiership?And Barker v Waverley will once again have to wait until the final round. The CAS seems to do a good job with their scheduling
And his body language after was alarming; similar to Sanix footage; needs to have a long hard think about crossing the line from impressively competitive to counterproductive territory… no CAS judiciary and is up to Barker to impose any sanction?Red card to Barker 12 the worst tackle I’ve seen in a long time.
14As Barker won comfortably from a dominant first half, even in the second half once Knox started tackling lower and blitzing rucks.How did lower grades go - Barker vs Knox?
Late spear; Knox player went immediately off with dislocated shoulder after putting arm out to try and break fallIs there a video? What sort of tackle was it?
Jeez, hope he's okay. Why will we see no CAS judiciary? Does CAS not imply any sort of suspensions? Simmilar to the Johann Ah colt incident against trinity earlier this season.
All they have is rugby though..
if they don’t win rugby what else are they?
Not much.
No. Well, I don't. I think they have a decent shot at third, though, as they should beat Cranbrook and St Aloysius.no one thinks trinity can take the premiership?
I'm not claiming they played on different fields or that there's some grand conspiracy - I'm saying Waverley agreed to conditions they’re consistently terrible in. It wasn’t shady, it was just stupid. They never should’ve said yes.
100% agreeAh, OK. But here's the thing: in recent years, the CAS-GPS game has quite often been played on a damp midweek night under indifferent lighting (eg at Knox). Should we tell the selectors not to pick Waverley players for games like that because they're consistently terrible in those conditions?
Third might be a couple places to low after the performance against waverly. After all they did just put on a clinic against a strong waverly side.No. Well, I don't. I think they have a decent shot at third, though, as they should beat Cranbrook and St Aloysius.
Hi mateTrinity 4th XV had to play sydney grammar as waverly didnt have the depth in there so called unbeatable rugby program. Not sure why you are questioning Trinity’s depth.
Not sure how i think about that, obviously, would be a lot of unnecessary effort and probably money to get some sort of judictory into CAS and for such a short season wouldnt be worth it, but from my view, headmasters may not hand out rugby related suspensions (and instead opt to give a school based detention or something of the other) to student sent off as it could throw the teams season into jepordy, whereas a non bias offical would give a just penalty to the student. Not sure if im right here but just something to think about.Code of conduct – cas-web
www.cas.nsw.edu.au
similar*Jeez, hope he's okay. Why will we see no CAS judiciary? Does CAS not imply any sort of suspensions? Simmilar to the Johann Ah colt incident against trinity earlier this season.
I understand your point, and you're right that setting up a formal judiciary process for a short school sports season could be a lot of effort and may not seem worthwhile. However, relying only on schools to hand out consequences can lead to inconsistent outcomes. One school might give a detention while another might suspend a player for the same offence, which could create an unfair situation.Not sure how i think about that, obviously, would be a lot of unnecessary effort and probably money to get some sort of judictory into CAS and for such a short season wouldnt be worth it, but from my view, headmasters may not hand out rugby related suspensions (and instead opt to give a school based detention or something of the other) to student sent off as it could throw the teams season into jepordy, whereas a non bias offical would give a just penalty to the student. Not sure if im right here but just something to think about.