Search results

I guess your selective choice of 14 allows Waylon to choose 15 - zip all. 1996 is the starting point WJ which lumps the Tahs in with the Sharks, Highlanders, Hurricanes, Chiefs and Stormers to have always come up short when it counts.

18 to be precise.

Don't concern yourself with the coaching staff Jets. Graham is a big upgrade from 'Dead Man Walking'. I am not in any way being disparaging of Mitch, the Force created the situation of a neutered coach who had, at least once, selections over-ruled by Mitch Hardy in season 2009. Force should have...

Agree wholeheartedly with the old saying and it certainly showed last year. I think the team Friendy trots out Sat night will be anything but a team of superstars and will be the better for it. Maybe best not to just use 2010 as a gauge for both the Reds and Brumbies, not to mention Force. And I...

I can understand why the Force would be under everyone's radar but not why most have: 1) written off the Brumbies and 2) rated the Reds so highly. 1. Stormers 2. Brumbies 3. Crusaders 4. Waratahs 5. Bulls 6. Blues 7. Force 8. Sharks 9. Reds 10. Hurricanes 11. Chiefs 12. Lions 13. Highlanders...

Thanks for the welcome. First time on the site, first thing I read in the first post on this thread...I want to see the Reds not try and run the Force pack off their feet but just physically smash them. And there is no chance of Rabs playing 10.

Shep's fine, Sharpie's better than 50:50 but there is the tantalising week 2 bye to really get him right. Just love the proposed Reds tactics of targeting the Force pack - blokes like Samo and Humphries (have you tried to get Connors back?) v Hodgo, Browny, Poey and McCalman...go for it!