Search results

It's probably a win in fact.

They have to own it. If the reds or Tahs get 50 put on them they are a disgrace to the country.

https://www.afr.com/companies/sport/inside-the-plot-to-get-rid-of-peter-v-landys-20250422-p5ltej

I didn't say he won't be in the 23 but there will be 10 players in the squad who aren't - what I was getting at is he should be one of the 3 #10s picked.

The Reds own real estate.

I'd have JOC (James O'Connor) in the squad even if not in the match day 23.

I don't think limiting it to three overseas picks is a given either. I'm actually happy for Taniela to go to France, maybe they can re World class him. You know the saying, the first name on the team sheet is the tight head prop, the second name is the reserve tight head prop. Pick him from...

They are probably punting the new 'not competing' rule sometimes depending on field position.

There's that too. He probably just thought he was ending the game.

A take from someone who knew the result and watched the game on delay - they were clearly very fatigued and I wonder if the Fijians watered the ground as per tradition to up the humidity. As Dan said any one of us would have done the same thing regardless of knowing the rules or not and I can't...

Don't need to, Eddie has shown us. I'm not suggesting it now BTW, although as old mate above points out our domestic landscape is unique, our super coaches have no direct coaching involvement for half the year. Perhaps they should be included in the national setup in some way, not necessarily...

It's actually what Eddie should have done instead of picking up discarded league coaches.

Most of it will be the incorporation of the three franchices. There could also be a a provision for the ongoing Rebels shitshow. We will see soon.

I found it bizarre that Weekend Today (i.e. Ch 9) didn't even mention the Tahs/Chiefs game in the sports rundowns. I was only watching till about 8, maybe it got a run later - but still.

I certainly don’t disagree with that.

Yes it was that. On field decision was a try so it was referred to the TMO for evidence to reverse it. After 300 replays and the entire planet saying it was a try every day of the week, the TMO stated it was clearly out.

The points distribution for this game was certainly strange - a chiefs player getting all the Tahs points, and some bloke called Leckie got all the Chiefs ones.

‘People’ being people on here? It probably made sense in some respects from the outside, but from the inside they were probably looking at the scrum strength and wanted/needed to get a win on the road. Anyway, it’s just a theory I have, will see if I’m right. There is some flexibility with...

That was epic, especially with that ref penalty count

The ref is trying his best to penalise the Tahs out the game but the chiefs keep knock-onning themselves out of it