Search results

will agree to disagree on fta. still think fta-foxtel hybrid has to be where rugby needs to be long term. would love to see a trade off study on a suite of options. that said. i think you might be onto something with the benched players. damn right give benched wallabies some game time. maybe...

hahaha you just keep your side of the bridge rams supporters :eek:

leichhardt oval. balmain subbies. uni, forget izzy as marquee player, he's best in the west. two words... benji marshall. below from 2011. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/fans-holler-for-a-marshall/story-e6frexnr-1226004728630

slim man, where you been? damn fine question. right now just wrapped to see nrc off the ground. i'm so excited i've changed my avatar as well as my underpants.:eek: to your question. i think life is about sharing and caring. i can't speak squirrel so can't translate. but if the food is...

my lady with headgear, this is going round in circles. lets cut to the chase. do you think rugby would be more sustainable (nrc, Super Rugby) with a combined Super Rugby-nrc contract that shows a number of fta games like successful afl/nrl codes do? if so, how do we make this happen?

do you want to see how dumb we are in rugby... visit the sports on foxtel site. http://www.foxtel.com.au/whats-on/sport/default.htm nrl is on foxtel. nrl is on fta. afl is on foxtel. afl is on fta. Super Rugby/nrc on foxtel. Super Rugby/nrc is NOT on fta. rugby is the odd one out with fta and talk of...

if a tree falls in the forest, does anybody hear it? if a brilliant game of super rugby (or nrc) is played, do potential foxtel subscribers see it? no, the game never happened. foxtel strategy when it comes to rugby should be. 1. increase rugby fans, get them hooked and wanting more. when fans...

flies both ways though. foxtel limits viewership. it's not until rugby is accessible to the masses that we would know for sure. that said. happy foxtel on board and hope they are flexible to show fta.

again might not matter. only one game needs to be televised by foxtel. correct? what is the go with broadcasting highlights though?

macca, this could be done for sure. each nrc effectively gets one televised home ground for first season correct? that opens the door for country teams to play at other venues like you suggest wagga, newcastle, central coast.

only as good as your last season. look at the score board. tahs on top of australian conference. whipping boys languishing below. ;)

so coast is country and country is coast. final thought on this one. calling them just country will just confuse fans. why not just call teams nsw country & coast. qld country & coast. ties things together in a bow. won't get the proverbial question. why do qld country play out of bond? why do...

And this is a Sydney thread. What are you doing on it ;)

Given enough time, a hypothetical chimpanzee typing at random would, as part of its output, almost surely produce one of Shakespeare's plays (or any other text). Want to be Crusader. Brumbies will always be our whipping boys and don't you forget it.

Articles flowing now... http://www.irrigator.com.au/story/2164775/brumbies-vikings-group-and-university-of-canberra-to-team-up-for-national-rugby-championship/?cs=12

9 or 10 teams. there you have it.

home straight. 5 more sleeps.

they're going to be hard to beat. which is good. important for them to be successful.

most of dubbo/orange/bathurst will rock up to watch a good game of footy. particularly if local boys are playing. basically if a player wants to play for nsw country, they would need to relocate to sydney. will see how things evolve i guess. sanza tv rights will be a biggie. the upside of a...

ok. thanks rf. should tip the hat to the west's jv also. do you think south's will stay with greater sydney alliance? anyone got line of sight on what is happening north of the border?