Search results

i am Australian and Irish. passports from both. one parent from each. oh, the agony of a lifetime deciding which to support. GO WALLABIES to win by 12

if the mob were even usually right, there'd be no richer or poorer or more or less or more powerful people. turn down the volume of the mob and listen to the very few who know.

ooooohhhh. Wallabies by 12 i am looking forward to this game immensely, with several great questions: - can Jones crack it and prove he is the muscle at 6? i think he can - can To'omua show he can run and tackle in the varied systems of TGC and Nathan Grey? i think he can, terrific young...

did you really have to go out and learn it all? poor you, having to do all that hard work i was born knowing it all

i have what my informant claims is inside information: that The Evil are deadset keen to "make a statement" about how good they are against Wales. if truth be such, The Evil will win by a substantial margin, say in the range 15-25 points.

Wallabies will win this handily (by 10-15 points or so) unless dark fates intervene.

i am missing something here and would appreciate an explanation. is Glen Jackson" - an ex New Zealander? - an ex-New Zealander who plays rugby? - an ex-player in NZ? (he did play a lot elsewhere) - an ex player for the NZ national team? - something else? my view is that Glen Jackson is yet...

TGC has never at any stage, to my knowledge, "ignored or not concentrated on" the set piece - yes, paraphrasing you a little. when the Tahs got touched up in the set pieces in a couple of games towards the end of the Soup, TGC admitted that he had made a mistake in placing greater emphasis in...

i hope you don't mind my edit.

err, Keiran Longbottom? Salesi Ma'afu?

more than that!

i think i know who you mean. i can't place his name because i haven't watched "English language" rugby tv from France for several years, but there was a terrible pom caller on ESPN. he was a pom bloke who was a dreadful caller - however, have no sense of paranoia; he was very democratic, being...

i am concerned that the board's collective opinion (the GAGGED consensus?) seems to have far too many Tahs in what should be the team. perhaps the time has come for the ARU to impose ceilings on the numbers of Tahs in the run-on 15, on the bench and in total?

not interested in Genia (SIC) and Foley or Phipps and Cooper? odd selectorial stance, that one. i'd like to see both those combos given an extensive trial.

as good a team as TGC and Nathan G could have selected from the herd they were given. i could not have selected better - high praise for them.

Andrew? George?

who are these blokes?

i am very much looking forward (sic) to seeing what TGC makes out of this bloke. appears to have the weaponry to be a serious member of the Tahs' Big Boppers.

then you are not as good as i

best way, imho, to evaluate a coach is to stfu and watch what he does for a long time before criticizing. sure, we should ask "why is he doing this or that" to educate ourselves and for the sheer intellectual joy of trying to get inside his head , but don't even imagine that we have the faintest...