Search results

hey i'm not the one who cried on a internet forum because a person didn't want to have a beer with me grow up and move on sir, you'll live

Can we give everyone who plays a medal too just so they feel included and not left out?..........bloody hell

Why not just do both? Mid year origin NSWvQLD VicvWA End of year possibles v probables Origin keeps its integrity and gets money, the PvP gets the superior contest and a chance to see the best against the next best

Every single thing you’re posting is working under the assumption of 4 Aussie teams where in reality, that’s only one of multiple options by the NZRU I’m gonna tap out here, you’re arguing with your heart not your head

correction, there's potential for 4 aussie teams, there's also potential that they may want 2, you cant just select one of the numbers because it suits your argument

when you go on about it as much as you have i think that could go very close to bitching territory....... They havent explicitly said 2 but they've said preference is 8-10 and high priority for a pacific team. Therefore doing simple maths part of their preferred model could very well mean only...

Havent you been bitching for literal weeks about AU not having a plan and not releasing it to the public etc etc then you've just pulled this crap saying that we don't know what NZ are planning and that's apparently ok

Theres a reason only competitions like AFL, NFL and NBA have a draft. It's sound logic that a draft won't work. Not to mention that League stopped drafting players as it was deemed a restriction of trade

I'd like to make shute shield a representative side. Only have 1st and 2nd Grade and Colts and geo-lock it and make some criteria around 80% plus need to live in area or have played for a junior club it would make clubs like uni actually put some effort into juniors, help out and revive...

super rugby Aateora is gonna get really crap real quickly if it remains a 5-6 team comp and 1 or 2 of those teams turn into long term whipping boys ala chiefs this year While we don't want the same number, the NRL and AFL are ok with having a few shit teams because they can play amongst...

NSW could have/should do some very fucking basic stuff like making all recruits not already affiliated with a club side align with a western suburbs club, that shit is super easy to do and sends a message to people

if you're gonna shit all over the eligibility and shoe-horn in guys that aren't from NSW/QLD for the sake of "inclusiveness" we may as well just scrap the concept and play possibles v probables. Id rather do that than a have a game that's parading as a "origin" style concept that doesn't...

exactly, by promoting premier rugby up a tier in this way, we'd be effectively killing it

I agree with your second point but surely you cant keep a straight face and say that those teams on paper aren't both better than the current reds and tahs. There's at max 2-3 people out of 30 there that aren't serious contenders for a wallabies spot

jeez i wouldnt be mad if that qld team doubled as our wallaby backline Think the eligibility is BS tho looking at those teams

In terms of alignment of geography and tribalism it's just been a clusterfuck I originally started supporting the Fleet (as it was Souths Affiliated team) Then was torn between Western Sydney and the stars as Souths were with the rams but geographically stars were closer Then stars left so...

From a NSW perspective the ARC nailed the club split a hell of a lot better than the NRC did

Do it in exchange fore the clubs playing ball and assisting in funding a NRC/ARC type development comp

like i said, if everyone wants to do it, fantastic. If not it shouldn't be a big deal

No it’s just a terrible fucking idea if we stay with the state based franchises, I’ve posted saying so previously. My whole argument for it is on the basis of ya going to a domestic league that goes somewhere along the same lines of the NRC. Then the Reds/Tahs become the origin franchises