Search results

Team lists are up. http://qrfsu.rugbynet.com.au/default.asp?id=194355

Jealously isn't pretty mate. Let's not talk down someone's achievements because we didn't accomplish them ourselves.

I think you mean Scott Malolua? Scott's a Premier Grade halfback for Ashgrove GPS is benching for the Queensland Reds for this weekends exhibition match and Jono Kent is playing for U20 Canberra Raiders this year and was the fullback for the U18's QLD origin side that curtain raised the main...

how and when are they going to name this squad when the aic season will seemingly be all but over before the gps season kicks off?

when do the aic teams get announced?

Read my post mate. I said the players from Ashgrove that are most likely to be picked for AIC 1/2. That's both squads.

Those who are describing this years worst-ever ashgrove team can't have possibly seen them play a phase of rugby. With one player (Maka #13) backing up from last years firsts, they are quite and inexperienced side and went against the odds to beat the favorited Eddies side. I'm not sure whether...

an oh so reliable source was heard that he has already put pen to paper. Preparing for lucas/genia to leave perhaps?

I am surprised with your halves choices there. I would of thought Frisby is more of a complete player (seen as a Halfback/Utility back) and his selection in the Reds 22 justifies this.

jack creighton

3. Harry Marshall (ASH)

I did miss that, but this is a forum for the AIC season of 2011

surely scott malolua will be a shoe in for AIC 1 selection, there isn't any body near his standard at firsts level. especially with simon gregg not playing yet this season. plus he is in the NTS squad...

stevenson and maka are from ashgrove

i believe so

Word has it that ashgrove's 13, played 9 and 10 last year for the second XV. could be struggling with the attacking difference there. and i don't think 12 is a notable ball player to begin with, looks as if he is there for he strong, straight running and his powerful one-on-one defence.

tim bethal is the number 5. had quite a strong game as did number 11 and 9. i would have to disagree with you in regards to the inside backs. Ashgrove only won the game because the defence was superb. 12 and 13 did especially well to hold off the very strong st pats centre combination. majority...

ashgrove defeated pats, 38-14