Posted this in the Super thread because of the contracting freeze being lifted but realised it probably make more sense here:
Word is the contract freeze has been lifted:
When contacted by The Weekend Australian on Friday, Rugby Australia said the “freeze” would be formally relaxed and an email had already been sent to Super Rugby executives stating that player contracting could start up again. Player agents are yet to be informed the freeze will be lifted.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sp...r/news-story/2afdc9574ead3d7b6524f861e5f20925
Not sure if this means there's more confidence around next year's model, a reaction to the blow back from all the press around Sua'ali'i or just the simple need to start contracting again or risk loosing too many players overseas. Probably some combination of the the 3.
The article also goes into where Sua'ali'i sits if he's on the $3 million or if he's on the $1.7 million, but given it's in the vein of Halloran's other attack pieces it doesn't really mention where he sits if he's on the 200-300k reported elsewhere. It does give a general salary range across the RA contracted players though, and it's clear he'd come in below the lower end of that, about 100-200k less than Maddocks, Banks and Tom Wright:
Wallabies candidates Jack Maddocks, Tom Banks and Tom Wright are understood to be on wages just below $400,000.
Honestly I wonder if the article has confused Tom and Liam Wright here, it seems more likely that Liam is on wallabies money than Tom, all things considered. It does seem high for either though.
That seems fairly reasonable given his potential. I do agree with point made that they should be directing more top end money towards a couple of locks, though if Sua'ali'i is on the lower figure reported it's a furphy to suggest he's getting money that should be going to them