Lions Tour 2025
- Thread starter KevinO
- Start date
Adam84
John Eales (66)
Just a thought… but during the B&I Lions series I think it would have been good to see the Wallabies play one or two of the Super Rugby teams as well rather then just sitting in camp. Some Super Rugby teams last played 5 weeks ago.
Wouldn’t be as much interest as B&I Matches vs Super Rugby but you could have played them at stadiums like Ballymore or Leichhardt,
Wouldn’t be as much interest as B&I Matches vs Super Rugby but you could have played them at stadiums like Ballymore or Leichhardt,
PhilClinton
Paul McLean (56)
ESPN article today implying that JOC (James O'Connor) and Foley exclusion from the AUNZ team is due to both insurance reasons and also to give Edmed and HMP a chance to impress for the Lions squad with some question marks around Lolesio.
We are utterly fucked if either of those guys seem like a good option to play against the Lions (well really we are fucked if any of the 4 names are selected).
We are utterly fucked if either of those guys seem like a good option to play against the Lions (well really we are fucked if any of the 4 names are selected).
Alex Sharpe
Larry Dwyer (12)
This 'Insurance' issue seems to be new, and if it is preventing blokes from achieving a career highlight of playing the Lions, then it sucks.
Crashy
Bob Davidson (42)
Foley said he spoke with RA about playing and that 'it wasnt to be'. Maybe the players get their own insurance or something? dunno how to solve this one except if RA parlay's off the cost of the insurance somehow.
KOB1987
John Eales (66)
I read somewhere that the insurance cost for Kerevi was something in the order of $100k. I’m guessing their jap insurance only cover them for their jap games (understandably) and that the clause says something like the home nation has to pay out their contract if they get injured in the test window. I can understand why RA wouldn’t want to fork out that sort of money for a player who isn’t really in discussions for the test side. Just speculating, but it must be something along these lines.
Last edited:
PhilClinton
Paul McLean (56)
Most articles have it being 5 digits, so it could be anywhere from $10k - 99k, you'd think it would have to be on that higher end for RA not to want to dish out the cash.
PhilClinton
Paul McLean (56)
Their clubs wouldn't care where the money comes from, either RA or the player, but realistically why would a player want to cover their own insurance and likely not back that money back on their match fee.
PhilClinton
Paul McLean (56)
Agree, but it has been refreshing to see some actual infringements being called during the lineout.
By the end of SRP (Super Rugby Pacific), every lineout was basically a free for all with the attacking team being able to throw the ball in however they wanted (regardless if contested or not) and some questionable maul tactics.
By the end of SRP (Super Rugby Pacific), every lineout was basically a free for all with the attacking team being able to throw the ball in however they wanted (regardless if contested or not) and some questionable maul tactics.
Strewthcobber
Michael Lynagh (62)
WR (World Rugby) Regulation 23 covers this
RA have to pay for coverage the player's insurance when they are on international duty.
This invitational game isn't covered by that, so RA would have to pay the "Primary Employer", which is theirJapanese club to arrange to extend the coverage to include this game.
I'd imagine the Japanese club doesn't want to do that, and sets their fee accordingly