Inside Shoulder
Nathan Sharpe (72)
GOOD - I will take great delight in setting her straight about itIS just doesn't work that way. They have no say in it. Big result for ACT !!!
GOOD - I will take great delight in setting her straight about itIS just doesn't work that way. They have no say in it. Big result for ACT !!!
Doesnt that ignore George's post above - ACt beat SydneyShould be a great game Thursday between Sydney & QLD Reds for the decider!!
Yes but Sydney have the 2 bonus points. Im from Victoria so no bias here. Just my thoughts. Whoever wins on Thursday will be top!Doesnt that ignore George's post above - ACt beat Sydney
..../snip/....
It looks unfair on paper that WA and Country are in the same pool as they look to be the weakest 2 teams at the tournament. .......
I think if you ask the boys from Schools and QLD White, they may have a different view regarding how hard and tough the boys from WA are. The scoreline may flatter Schools, but they were made to work very hard for their points, and to keep WA out.
There are some very talented boys in the Schools team that are playing with confidence. They seem a step above the others (so far).
QLD White seemed to be in cruise control today. Scoring at will from scraps of possession.
WA have plenty of talent, but as per some scribes advice, they seemed to run out of steam in the end. Their scrum outperformed Schools and are not easy beats. NSW had their "A" team on for most of the game, although something you will not see in an international game, the last few minutes of the game, they finished with no 4, No 5, and No 1 playing as 6, 7 and 8 respectively.
Country were able to dominate possession and position for much of the game vs White. They just lacked a knockout punch to capitalise.
IMHO the WA boys would perform with merit in Pool B.
HJ , Totally agree with you. Schools took todays game very seriously with keeping their A team on for most of the game. Schools worked very hard to put that score together and in both halves when they relaxed a little WA took it to them. Schools is playing a great form of disciplined Rugby, and I'm sure that both WA and Country would be in the mix if they were in the other pool.I think if you ask the boys from Schools and QLD White, they may have a different view regarding how hard and tough the boys from WA are. The scoreline may flatter Schools, but they were made to work very hard for their points, and to keep WA out.
There are some very talented boys in the Schools team that are playing with confidence. They seem a step above the others (so far).
WA have plenty of talent, but as per some scribes advice, they seemed to run out of steam in the end. Their scrum outperformed Schools and are not easy beats. NSW had their "A" team on for most of the game, although something you will not see in an international game, the last few minutes of the game, they finished with no 4, No 5, and No 1 playing as 6, 7 and 8 respectively.
Country were able to dominate possession and position for much of the game vs White. They just lacked a knockout punch to capatilise.
IMHO the WA boys would perform with merit in Pool B.
As previously mentioned in a G&G thread; a common practice these days at junior rep levels is to have a loose five. That is, the 4,5,6,7,8 are all back rowers but can only be accommodated in rep teams by displacing the specialist lock who will only develop in later years.HJ , Totally agree with you. Schools took todays game very seriously with keeping their A team on for most of the game. Schools worked very hard to put that score together and in both halves when they relaxed a little WA took it to them. Schools is playing a great form of disciplined Rugby, and I'm sure that both WA and Country would be in the mix if they were in the other pool.
Interesting that their 4 and 5 both great locks at this age can slot into the loosies roll and the team still dominates at the breakdown !!They play 6 and 8 for their schools
Oh the joy of schoolboy rugby.
That is not the "issue" with this Gordon player. It is at the breakdown, AFTER the tackle has been made that he digresses.Interesting thought on Nick Burkett yellow card today. It appears that his technique of "grass cutting" hitting very low around the ankles of opposing players at the ruck and maul , something that he has done for the last few seasons without penalty is catching the ire of the refs. Maybe needs a technique change?? I'm sure its being taught at the gold squad, maybe he's just too good at it
GS can you explain the tackle - I dont think I've seen itThat is not the "issue" with this Gordon player. It is at the breakdown, AFTER the tackle has been made.
It cannot happen at the R&M as the Law requires all players to come thru the gate and bind as you enter. If the player does not "bind" onto their opponent or own team player then it is illegal.
The "grass cutter" technique came across to junior rugby from league and predominately is used by players from Manly and also from the Western Zone. Refs have been on the case for some years now.
It's an automatic YC in Vic for a grass cutter tackle across the board and as it should be. Diving in with the shoulder at someone's knees is a poor act and the player deserves to be sat down.Interesting thought on Nick Burkett yellow card today. It appears that his technique of "grass cutting" hitting very low around the ankles of opposing players at the ruck and maul , something that he has done for the last few seasons without penalty is catching the ire of the refs. Maybe needs a technique change?? I'm sure its being taught at the gold squad, maybe he's just too good at it