• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

NSW AAGPS 2024

Status
Not open for further replies.
3s competition very competitive this year. Game of the round was Shore v Joeys today - dominant performance from Shore 3s until late in second half when discipline and some mistakes let Joeys in. Anyone get a good look at stand out players in that game? 13 From Joeys very strong ball runner in previous games from my knowledge.
 

NedKelly

Herbert Moran (7)
Ah perfect Segway. Cheers Crashy. Competition Round number 5 statistics
View attachment 19398
Hi Chairman, thanks for the tables. If you click on top of the columns and select 'sort descending' it will put them in order from highest to lowest.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2024-06-15 at 5.48.48 pm.png
    Screen Shot 2024-06-15 at 5.48.48 pm.png
    116.4 KB · Views: 277

PROPaganda

Chris McKivat (8)
AAGPS 1st XV Ladder
SCHOOLPLDWONLOSTDRAWNFORAGNDIFFPTS
St Joseph's College541011071398WWLWW
Newington College5320111112-16WWWLL
The King's School5221108112-45LWWLD
Shore523010810624WLLWL
Saint Ignatius' College52307678-24LLLWW
The Scots College513173107-343LLWLD
 

Maul of Duty

Ward Prentice (10)
They’ve always had excellent backs and their forwards gave them plenty of ball.
Despite weather was great conditions for fast backs play.
Defensive effort from Kings was (reviews schools thread guidelines) a good opportunity for improvement.
Cost them the game, not taking anything away from New who were scintillating but some of the tackling was, well, schoolboyish!
Yes, Kings backline defence did not get the job done today. Luckily their forwards were solid otherwise the score line would have been much worse for the Kingsmen
 

Where's the beef

Chris McKivat (8)
A short summary of the Joeys View game.

View controlled the first half. This was abley assisted by some of the officiating which was at times pedantic for both teams. View won hands down the kicking contest that Joeys seemed happy to participate in. Views forwards were more dominant as well. The first try was typically view, rolling a ball behind to get the chase. The second was terrible defence from joeys who had 4 players around a mid field bomb and let it bounce and bounce again for it to be swooped on to score on the bell. Every time joeys had the ball in the first half they either dropped it, were penalised or kicked it. All within the joeys half, often within the Joeys 22. The try they scored was the only visit to views 22, and they almost stuffed it.

At half time, looked like view were being gifted the chocolates inclusive of the box.

Second half saw an unfortunate kick off for view resulting in Joeys gaining a scrum deep in their 22, View infringed, and Joeys took the Tap and barged over thanks to a nice switch play with the backs.

The second that gave them the lead they worked it through the forwards. Joeys classy backs were nowhere to be found as View flooded the outside channels. The Joeys 12 was given some room and did take all on offer. The kicking game in the second half was more even and while you felt view was ontop in the forwards, it was not by much and they did not really trouble the joeys defence that much.

There was a moment in the second half where the View View play ducked and weaved and caught a joeys arm and joeys were fortunate that they were not down to 14 men with 11 to go. Having said that View was not troubling the joeys defence and to be fair, Joeys was not really troubling the view defence either.

A tight Contest, with View willing, but, Joeys, just had a touch more class when it mattered. The score was reflective of the game.

WTB
 

Whataflanker

Frank Nicholson (4)
A short summary of the Joeys View game.

View controlled the first half. This was abley assisted by some of the officiating which was at times pedantic for both teams. View won hands down the kicking contest that Joeys seemed happy to participate in. Views forwards were more dominant as well. The first try was typically view, rolling a ball behind to get the chase. The second was terrible defence from joeys who had 4 players around a mid field bomb and let it bounce and bounce again for it to be swooped on to score on the bell. Every time joeys had the ball in the first half they either dropped it, were penalised or kicked it. All within the joeys half, often within the Joeys 22. The try they scored was the only visit to views 22, and they almost stuffed it.

At half time, looked like view were being gifted the chocolates inclusive of the box.

Second half saw an unfortunate kick off for view resulting in Joeys gaining a scrum deep in their 22, View infringed, and Joeys took the Tap and barged over thanks to a nice switch play with the backs.

The second that gave them the lead they worked it through the forwards. Joeys classy backs were nowhere to be found as View flooded the outside channels. The Joeys 12 was given some room and did take all on offer. The kicking game in the second half was more even and while you felt view was ontop in the forwards, it was not by much and they did not really trouble the joeys defence that much.

There was a moment in the second half where the View View play ducked and weaved and caught a joeys arm and joeys were fortunate that they were not down to 14 men with 11 to go. Having said that View was not troubling the joeys defence and to be fair, Joeys was not really troubling the view defence either.

A tight Contest, with View willing, but, Joeys, just had a touch more class when it mattered. The score was reflective of the game.

WTB
Good summary. Still amazed the Joeys player who instinctively coat hangered the View No. 9 in the second half didn’t get a yellow card. Officials also missed a crucial knock on 20m out from Joeys line after View 15 chased his own kick and put a massive shot on Joeys player who caught it. Hard to say who deserved to win it but records will show Joeys did so that’s all that matters.
 

CasualObserver

Sydney Middleton (9)
Good summary. Still amazed the Joeys player who instinctively coat hangered the View No. 9 in the second half didn’t get a yellow card. Officials also missed a crucial knock on 20m out from Joeys line after View 15 chased his own kick and put a massive shot on Joeys player who caught it. Hard to say who deserved to win it but records will show Joeys did so that’s all that matters.
Ref also missed about 5 Riverview players not retreating when kick went up. It all evens out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top